未知姿态目标航磁异常探测的最优飞行方向分析

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.01.05

Abstract

Abstract:

In aeromagnetic anomaly detection, flight path optimization for aerial platform is one of the key approaches to improve magnetic anomaly signal intensity. However, the magnetic moment of a ferromagnetic target magnetized by geomagnetic field varies with its attitude, resulting that the spatial distribution of the target magnetic field is related to the unpredictable target attitude. In this paper, an accurate computation model of the magnetic moment of a typical target is established. The calculation results show that the modulus of magnetic moment generated by the geomagnetization of the target at different attitudes (orientation: 0°~360° and pitch: -90°~90°) varies from 3.55×10⁵ to 2.42×10⁶ A·m². The magnetic moment value reaches a maximum and minimum when the long axis of the target is in line with the direction of the geomagnetic field and perpendicular to the direction of the geomagnetic field, respectively. The difference between the calculation results and the simulation results is only 0.003%~0.04%. According to the analysis of aeromagnetic detection modeling, the angle between the path of the maximum magnetic anomaly signal in the flight plane and the projection of geomagnetic field varies from 0° to 50.045 7°. When the attitude and magnetic moment of the target are unpredictable, the path in line with the projection of geomagnetic field is a better choice. The variation of magnetic anomaly signal on this path is 78%~100% of the maximum variation in the flight plane.

Key words: magnetic anomaly detection, optimal flight path, computation model of the magnetic moment, signal strength

CLC Number:

O411.3

Yu SHI, Leixiang BIAN, Zhihong ZHUANG, Mengyin FU, Chune WANG, Jie QIN. Optimal flight direction analysis for aeromagnetic anomaly detection of unknown attitude targets[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 46(1): 42-50.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

References 30

1	金煌煌, 庄志洪, 付梦印, 等. 最简多磁偶极子等效建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (8): 2066- 2075.
	JIN H H , ZHUANG Z H , FU M Y , et al. Modeling method using simplest multiple magnetic dipoles equivalence[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (8): 2066- 2075.
2	ZHAO Y , ZHANG J H , LI J H , et al. A brief review of magnetic anomaly detection[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2021, 32 (4): 042002.
3	YOO L S , LEE J H , LEE Y K , et al. Application of a drone magnetometer system to military mine detection in the demilitarized zone[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21 (9): 3175. doi: 10.3390/s21093175
4	ELDOSOUKY A M , El-QASSAS R A Y , POUR A B , et al. Integration of ASTER satellite imagery and 3D inversion of aeromagnetic data for deep mineral exploration[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2021, 68 (9): 3641- 3662. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.07.016
5	MEHANEE S , ESSA K S , DIAB Z E . Magnetic data interpretation using a new R-parameter imaging method with application to mineral exploration[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2021, 30 (1): 77- 95. doi: 10.1007/s11053-020-09690-8
6	DAVIS K , LI Y , NABIGHIAN M . Automatic detection of UXO magnetic anomalies using extended Euler deconvolution[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75 (3): G13- G20. doi: 10.1190/1.3375235
7	MU Y X , XIE W P , ZHANG X J . The joint UAV-borne magnetic detection system and cart-mounted time domain electromagnetic system for UXO detection[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13 (12): 2343. doi: 10.3390/rs13122343
8	ZHOU J Q , WANG C , PENG G , et al. Magnetic anomaly detection via a combination approach of minimum entropy and gradient orthogonal functions[J]. ISA Transactions, 2023, 134, 548- 560. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.08.026
9	VENEGAS-ARAVENA P , CORDARO E , LAROZE D . Fractal clustering as spatial variability of magnetic anomalies measurements for impending earthquakes and the thermodynamic fractal dimension[J]. Fractal and Fractional, 2022, 6 (11): 624- 636. doi: 10.3390/fractalfract6110624
10	ZHANG J S , GAO R , ZENG L S , et al. Relationship between characteristics of gravity and magnetic anomalies and the earthquakes in the Longmenshan range and adjacent areas[J]. Tectonophysics, 2010, 491 (1/4): 218- 229.
11	JIN H H , GUO J , WANG H B , et al. Magnetic anomaly detection and localization using orthogonal basis of magnetic tensor contraction[J]. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58 (8): 5944- 5954. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2973322
12	JIN H H , ZHUANG Z H , WANG H B . None-asphericity-error method for magnetic dipole target detection[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, 15 (8): 1294- 1298. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2827568
13	WANG C , ZHANG X J , QU X D , et al. A modified magnetic gradient contraction based method for ferromagnetic target localization[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16 (12): 2168. doi: 10.3390/s16122168
14	YIN G , LI P , WEI Z , et al. Magnetic dipole localization and magnetic moment estimation method based on normalized source strength[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2020, 502, 166450. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166450
15	WAN C B , PAN M C , ZHANG Q , et al. Magnetic anomaly detection based on stochastic resonance[J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2018, 278, 11- 17. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.05.009
16	SHEINKER A . Magnetic anomaly detection using high-order crossing method[J]. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2012, 50 (4): 1095- 1103.
17	曲晓慧, 陈建勇, 单志超. 飞机航向对航空磁探仪搜潜概率影响的仿真[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2014, 39 (5): 135-137, 141.
	QU X H , CHEN J Y , SHAN Z H . Simulation study on effect of aero flight orientation on searching submarine probability of airborne magnetic anomaly detector[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2014, 39 (5): 135-137, 141.
18	吴芳, 吴铭, 杨日杰, 等. 反潜巡逻机运动态势对潜艇磁异常信号的影响分析[J]. 测试技术学报, 2017, 31 (4): 283- 289.
	WU F , WU M , YANG R J , et al. Analysis the affection of the anti-submarine aircraft's movement situation to the magnetic anomaly signal of submarine[J]. Journal of Test and Measurement Technology, 2017, 31 (4): 283- 289.
19	MOSER P M. Magnetic signatures of submarines I[R]. California: Pacific-Sierra Research Corporation Warminster United States, 1994.
20	SCHLUCKEBIER D C. A comparison of three magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) models[R]. California: Naval Postgraduate School Montereyca, 1984.
21	曾洪. MAD信号研究中的潜艇磁矩分析[J]. 声学与电子工程, 1987, (4): 9- 15.
	ZENG H . Analysis of submarine magnetic moments in MAD signal studies[J]. Acoustics and Electronics Engineering, 1987, (4): 9- 15.
22	SITHIRAVEL R , BALAJI B , NELSON B , et al. Airborne maritime surveillance using magnetic anomaly detection signature[J]. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2020, 56 (5): 3476- 3490. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2020.2973866
23	BALAJI B, NELSON J B. Parameter estimation and tracking of a magnetic dipole[C]//Signal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXⅢ, 2014: 71-80.
24	刘辉. 基于感应磁场的潜艇磁异常计算模型[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2018, 26 (2): 152- 156.
	LIU H . Magnetic anomaly calculation model of submarine based on induced magnetic field[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2018, 26 (2): 152- 156.
25	刘敦歌. 目标磁异常/轴频信号处理方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2016.
	LIU D G. Research on target magnetic anomaly/shaft-rate electromagnetic field signal processing method[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016.
26	孙权, 唐劲飞. 潜艇磁场的估算与仿真[J]. 鱼雷技术, 2011, 19 (4): 318- 320.
	SUN Q , TANG J F . Estimation and simulation of submarine magnetic field[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2011, 19 (4): 318- 320.
27	周耀忠, 张国友. 舰船磁场分析计算[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2004.
	ZHOU Y Z , ZHANG G Y . Analysis and calculation of ship magnetic field[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2004.
28	BLAKELY R J . Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
29	孙晓永. 磁目标探测联合仿真技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2016.
	SUN X Y. Study on the joint simulation technology of magnetic target detection[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2016.
30	杨勇. 基于正交基分解的磁性目标检测技术研究[D]. 宜昌: 中国舰船研究院, 2015.
	YANG Y. The magnetic target detection based on orthonormalized functions decomposition[D]. Yichang: China Ship Research and Development Academy, 2015.

[1]	XIONG Xiong， YANG Rijie， SHEN Yang. Search probability evaluation model of airborne magnetic anomaly detection based on equivalent average sweep width [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(3): 487-493.
[2]	LIU Zhen, WANG Qi, DING Ming-li. Fuzzy logic autonomous navigation method for WSN mobile nodes [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(1): 137-141.
[3]	LI Lei, QIN Guo-jun, HU Niao-qing, CHEN Kai. Wireless sensor node location approach based on transmission distance estimation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(1): 213-215.
[4]	LI Lei, QIN Guo-jun, HU Niao-qing, CHEN Kai. Wireless sensor node location approach based on transmission distance estimation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(01): 213-215.
[5]	LIU Zhen, WANG Qi, DING Ming-li. Fuzzy logic autonomous navigation method for WSN mobile nodes [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(01): 137-141.

Optimal flight direction analysis for aeromagnetic anomaly detection of unknown attitude targets

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 30

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments