基于Sobol敏感性分析的装备体系保障效能评估

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.02.14

Abstract

Abstract:

Modern warfare tends to the confront between system of systems (SoS), and the support capability of the equipment SoS has become the key to affect the combat capability of equipment SoS. In order to measure the effect of equipment system support quantitatively, it is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of equipment SoS support scientifically. Firstly, the support capability of the equipment SoS is analyzed, and the effectiveness index of the equipment SoS is obtained. Secondly, based on the Sobol sensitivity analysis method, the availability of the equipment system is analyzed, and the importance of the support capability index of the equipment SoS is obtained. Thirdly, the effectiveness evaluation method of the equipment SoS support with the power index method based on Sobol sensitivity analysis is proposed. Finally, the multi-agent simulation method is used to evaluate the support effectiveness of an equipment SoS, and the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified.

Key words: equipment system of systems (SoS) support, effectiveness evaluation, system of systems (SoS) availability, Sobol sensitivity analysis

CLC Number:

TB114.3

Xing PAN, Zhenyu ZHANG, Yanmei ZHANG, Ranran WANG. Equipment SoS support effectiveness evaluation based on Sobol sensitivity analysis[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 390-398.

Figures/Tables 15

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

References 30

1	LUBAS D G.Department of defense system of systems reliability challenges[C]//Proc.of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2017.
2	王琴琴, 宋太亮, 汤伟达, 等. 基于效用函数的装备保障效能评估方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2014, 39 (11): 76- 79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2014.11.019
	WANG Q Q , SONG T L , TANG W D , et al. Evaluation of equipment support efficiency based on theory of utility function[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2014, 39 (11): 76- 79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2014.11.019
3	TILLMAN F A , HWANG C L , KUO W . System effectiveness models:an annotated bibliography[J]. IEEE Trans.on Reliability, 1980, 29 (4): 295- 304. doi: 10.1109/TR.1980.5220844
4	祝华远, 马乃苍, 崔亚君. 基于ADC的军用飞机保障效能模型[J]. 兵工自动化, 2014, 33 (11): 17- 19. doi: 10.7690/bgzdh.2014.11.006
	ZHU H Y , MA N C , CUI Y J . Research on support effectiveness model of battle plane based on ADC[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2014, 33 (11): 17- 19. doi: 10.7690/bgzdh.2014.11.006
5	张洋铭, 陈云翔, 项华春, 等. 航空四站保障效能组合评估方法[J]. 系统工程理论与电子技术, 2017, 39 (2): 340- 347.
	ZHANG Y M , CHEN Y X , XIANG H C , et al. Combined evaluation method of aviation four-station support efficiency[J]. System Engineering and Electronic, 2017, 39 (2): 340- 347.
6	许贵君, 王晖, 赵凯. 基于仿真的装备保障指挥效能评估方法研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2017, 34 (11): 1- 6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2017.11.001
	XU G J , WANG H , ZHAO K . Effectiveness evaluation method based on simulation for equipment support command[J]. Computer Simulation, 2017, 34 (11): 1- 6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2017.11.001
7	熊彪, 王帅, 李必鑫, 等. 基于ARENA的航空兵场站油料保障效能仿真评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39 (4): 92- 96. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2018.04.020
	XIONG B , WANG S , LI B X , et al. Simulation for POL support effectiveness evaluation of air base based on arena[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39 (4): 92- 96. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2018.04.020
8	李羚玮, 王兵, 曹军海, 等. 基于仿真的装备动用与保障效能评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31 (9): 1747- 1754.
	LI L W , WANG B , CAO J H , et al. Equipment assignment and supporting efficiency evaluation based on simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31 (9): 1747- 1754.
9	尹丽丽, 寇力, 范文慧. 基于多Agent的装备保障体系分布式建模与仿真方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29 (12): 3185- 3194.
	YIN L L , KOU L , FAN W H . Distributed modeling and simulation method of equipment support system based on multi-agent[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29 (12): 3185- 3194.
10	高龙, 曹军海, 宋太亮, 等. 分布式装备保障体系任务分配模型[J]. 装甲兵工程学院学报, 2018, 32 (6): 13- 21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1497.2018.06.003
	GAO L , CAO J G , SONG T L , et al. Distributed task assignment model for equipment support system[J]. Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering, 2018, 32 (6): 13- 21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1497.2018.06.003
11	GOROD A , SAUSER B , BOARDMAN J . System-of-systems engineering management:a review of modern history and a path forward[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2008, 2 (4): 484- 499. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2008.2007163
12	KUMAR P , MERZOUKI R , BOUAMAMA B O . Multilevel modeling of system of systems[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics:Systems, 2018, 48 (8): 1309- 1320. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2668065
13	CHENG Z L , FAN L , ZHANG Y L . A framework for equipment systems-of-systems effectiveness evaluation using parallel experiments approach[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26 (2): 292- 300. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2015.00035
14	MATTHEWS D, COLLIER P.Assessing the value of a C⁴ISREW system-of-systems capability[C]//Proc.of the 5th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2000.
15	潘星, 张振宇, 张曼丽, 等. 基于SoSE的装备体系RMS论证方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1771- 1779.
	PAN X , ZHANG Z Y , ZHANG M L , et al. Research on RMS demonstration method of equipment SoS based on SoSE[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1771- 1779.
16	KEATING C B , PADILLA J J , ADAMS K . System of systems engineering requirements:challenges and guidelines[J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2008, 20 (4): 24- 31. doi: 10.1080/10429247.2008.11431785
17	KRISTEN J B.Systems engineering guide for systems of systems[R].Washington DC: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, Systems and Software Engineering, 2008: 33-34.
18	SALTELLI A , RATTO M , TARANTOLA S , et al. Sensitivity analysis practices:strategies for model-based inference[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2006, 91 (10/11): 1109- 1125.
19	BORGONOVO E . Sensitivity analysis:an introduction for the management scientist[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017: 93- 100.
20	OLADYSHKIN S , BARROS F P J D , NOWAK W . Global sensitivity analysis:a flexible and efficient framework with an example from stochastic hydrogeology[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2012, 37, 10- 22. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.11.001
21	CHANG X , XU Z X , ZHAO G , et al. Sensitivity analysis on SWMM model parameters based on Sobol method[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2018, 37 (3): 59- 68.
22	SHRIPRAKASH S . Hilbert-Schmidt and Sobol sensitivity indices for static and time series Wnt signaling measurements in colorectal cancer-part A[J]. BMC Systems Biology, 2017, 11 (1): 120- 130. doi: 10.1186/s12918-017-0488-z
23	ZHANG X Y , TRAME M , LESKO L , et al. Sobol sensitivity analysis:a tool to guide the development and evaluation of systems pharmacology models[J]. CPT:Pharmacometrics Systems Pharmacology, 2015, 4 (2): 69- 79. doi: 10.1002/psp4.6
24	ALHOSSEN I , VILLENEUVEFAURE C , BAUDOIN F , et al. Sensitivity analysis of the electrostatic force distance curve using Sobol's method and design of experiments[J]. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, 2018, 50 (3): 035304. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/50/3/035304
25	LU Y, CHANG L, YANG K, et al.Study on system of systems capability modeling framework based on complex relationship analyzing[C]//Proc.of the IEEE International Systems Conference, 2010: 23-28.
26	SILVA E, BATISTA T, OQUENDO F.A mission-oriented approach for designing system-of-systems[C]//Proc.of the 10th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, 2015: 346-351.
27	郭齐胜. 装备效能评估概论[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2005.
	GUO Q S . Introduction to equipment efficiency evaluation[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2015.
28	GRIENDLING K, MAVRIS D N.Development of a DoDAF-based executable architecting approach to analyze system-of-systems alternatives[C]//Proc.of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2011.
29	GE B , HIPEL K W , YANG K , et al. A novel executable modeling approach for system-of-systems architecture[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2014, 8 (1): 4- 13. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2013.2270573
30	CONNORSC D , MILLERJ O , LUNDAYB J . Using agent-based modeling and a designed experiment to simulate and analyze a new air-to-air missile[J]. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation:Applications, Methodology, Technology, 2015, 13 (3): 321- 330.

装备	权重(用Sobol敏感性分析法确定权重)
装备	X₁	X₂/min	X₃/min
LJ1	0.8~1	11~20	11~20
LJ2	0.9~1	12~20	12~20
LJ3	0.75~1	10~18	10~18
YJ1	0.85~1	9~21	9~21
YJ2	0.7~1	10~22	10~22
YJ3	0.9~1	8~16	8~16
YJ4	0.8~1	10~20	10~20
ZK1	0.8~1	9~18	9~18
ZK2	0.9~1	10~20	10~20
ZK3	0.85~1	10~18	10~18

装备	权重(用Sobol敏感性分析法确定权重)
装备	X₄/km	X₅/(km/h)	X₆/min	X₇/%	X₈/%	X₉/km	X₁₀/(km/h)	X₁₁/%	X₁₂/%
LJ1	600~800	65~70	100~240	92~95	90~93	750~800	65~70	90~93	95~98
LJ2	700~800	60~75	120~240	83~90	91~95	700~800	60~75	80~86	90~95
LJ3	650~800	60~70	130~240	90~93	95~98	750~800	60~70	93~97	90~96
YJ1	600~850	65~80	120~200	85~88	90~95	600~700	65~80	80~85	95~98
YJ2	600~800	60~80	120~200	83~88	90~94	700~750	60~80	95~98	90~94
YJ3	620~810	60~70	100~240	92~96	95~98	700~800	60~70	90~96	93~97
YJ4	630~800	60~75	150~240	96~99	91~95	700~850	60~75	95~98	93~96
ZK1	630~800	60~75	150~240	92~95	87~91	650~800	60~70	90~95	80~97
ZK2	600~800	60~80	120~240	90~95	86~90	750~850	60~80	90~96	90~95
ZK3	700~800	60~70	150~250	91~96	92~98	700~800	60~70	95~99	90~94

装备	权重(用Sobol敏感性分析法确定权重)
装备	X₁₃/min	X₁₄/km	X₁₅/(km/h)	X₁₆/min	X₁₇/km	X₁₈/(km/h)	X₁₉/%	X₂₀/%
LJ1	5~10	600~800	60~80	8~12	700~800	60~80	91~95	95~98
LJ2	6~10	800~1 000	60~80	10~12	600~800	60~80	93~96	90~96
LJ3	4~10	800~1 000	60~80	8~12	700~900	60~80	92~96	96~99
YJ1	5~10	900~1 000	60~80	6~12	700~800	60~80	90~94	97~99
YJ2	8~10	800~900	60~80	10~12	600~700	60~80	90~97	93~97
YJ3	6~10	800~1 000	60~80	10~15	500~600	60~80	94~96	91~97
YJ4	5~10	800~950	60~80	8~12	700~800	60~80	91~95	89~96
ZK1	8~10	800~900	60~80	8~16	600~800	60~80	92~96	90~95
ZK2	4~10	700~800	60~80	10~20	700~800	60~80	91~96	92~97
ZK3	4~10	800~900	60~80	10~15	600~800	60~80	90~95	86~93

装备	权重(用Sobol敏感性分析法确定权重)
装备	X₂₁/s	X₂₂/s	X₂₃/min	X₂₄/s	X₂₅/s	X₂₆/min
LJ1	10~30	100~200	5~8	10~18	100~140	10~14
LJ2	5~20	50~200	5~8	4~14	80~180	6~8
LJ3	10~18	80~160	6~8	5~17	50~150	7~12
YJ1	6~12	60~120	5~10	6~14	80~180	5~13
YJ2	10~20	100~180	5~9	6~15	80~160	5~8
YJ3	8~20	100~300	6~12	7~18	40~120	5~8
YJ4	5~15	60~200	10~14	10~18	60~120	6~8
ZK1	10~20	100~180	6~8	6~12	100~180	5~10
ZK2	6~20	80~180	7~12	10~20	100~300	5~9
ZK3	8~16	50~150	5~13	8~20	60~120	6~12

装备	S_X₁	S_X₂	S_X₃
LJ1	0.401	0.289	0.331
LJ2	0.383	0.361	0.402
LJ3	0.421	0.261	0.303
YJ1	0.438	0.298	0.271
YJ2	0.501	0.303	0.291
YJ3	0.523	0.289	0.381
YJ4	0.462	0.389	0.370
ZK1	0.503	0.390	0.388
ZK2	0.469	0.399	0.396
ZK3	0.479	0.359	0.371

Equipment SoS support effectiveness evaluation based on Sobol sensitivity analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

装备	X₁	X₂	X₃
LJ1	0.67	0.46	0.46
LJ2	0.83	0.43	0.43
LJ3	0.58	0.57	0.57
YJ1	0.75	0.50	0.50
YJ2	0.50	0.43	0.43
YJ3	0.83	0.71	0.71
YJ4	0.67	0.50	0.50
ZK1	0.67	0.61	0.61
ZK2	0.83	0.50	0.50
ZK3	0.75	0.57	0.57

装备	效能指数值
LJ1	0.526
LJ2	0.489
LJ3	0.579
YJ1	0.597
YJ2	0.428
YJ3	0.721
YJ4	0.491
ZK1	0.556
ZK2	0.531
ZK3	0.578

[1]	Shunqi HUAN, Zhemei FAN, Jianbo WANG. System-of-systems effectiveness evaluation method based on functional dependency network [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(7): 2191-2200.
[2]	Xiangyang LIN, Qinghua XING, Fuxian LIU. Research on optimization of combat force for key air defense model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 921-928.
[3]	Luyun QIU, Zhigeng FANG, Liangyan TAO, Qiucheng TAO. Effectiveness evaluation of network SoS based on improved FDNA model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3728-3737.
[4]	Chenrui SHI, Lu TIAN, Zhan XU, Ruxin ZHI, Jinhui CHEN. Effectiveness evaluation method of emergency communication and sensing equipment based on PSO-BP [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3455-3462.
[5]	Ang GAO, Qisheng GUO, Zhiming DONG, Shaoqing YANG. Research on efficiency evaluation method of multi unmanned ground vehicle system based on EAS+MADRL [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3643-3651.
[6]	Weisheng YANG, Yu WANG, Yang YANG, Liang TANG. Combat network effectiveness evaluation under different node attack strategies based on operation loop [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228.
[7]	Chi HAN, Wei XIONG. Operational effectiveness evaluation of space reconnaissance equipment based on SVR optimized by improved grey wolf optimizer [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2902-2910.
[8]	Biao LI, Liwen WANG, Zhiwei XING, Qian LUO. Effectiveness evaluation of ground support process for transit flight [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1543-1549.
[9]	Minle WANG. Overview on combat operation planning of missile force [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(12): 2825-2832.
[10]	Zhigeng FANG, Ruirui SHAO, Zhao WANG, Sifeng LIU, Weiqing YOU, Su GAO. PS-GERT effectiveness evaluation model of GEO satellite communication constellation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(10): 2356-2365.
[11]	WANG Shuangchuan, JIA Xisheng, HU Qiwei, WANG Qiang. Effectiveness evaluation for equipment maintenance support system based on normal grey cloud model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(7): 1576-1582.
[12]	ZHANG Zhuang, LI Linlin, WEI Zhenhua, YU Hongfeng. Dynamic effectiveness evaluation of command and control system based on variable weight projection gray target [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(4): 801-809.
[13]	WANG Shuangchuan, HU Qiwei, LI Feng, WANG Qiang, RAN Qiaoran, MA Yunfei. Overview on effectiveness evaluation of equipment maintenance support [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(10): 2271-2278.
[14]	LUO Chengkun, CHEN Yunxiang, WANG Lili, WANG Zezhou, CHANG Zheng. Effectiveness evaluation method of system-of-systems based on operation loop and improved information entropy [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(1): 73-80.
[15]	LI Linlin, LU Yunfei, ZHANG Zhuang, HE He. Effectiveness evaluation of command and control system based on cloud model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(4): 815-822.