基于元模型的装备体系知识图谱构建

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.07.19

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对当前军事领域知识图谱描述装备体系存在的数据规范程度不高、实体不统一和实体关系不一致等问题, 提出一种基于元模型的军事领域本体模型构建方法。该方法采用体系架构元模型技术框架下的概念数据模型和逻辑数据模型定义装备体系本体, 从而生成装备体系知识图谱, 避免不同兵种、不同业务领域装备体系本体不一致的影响。选取协同打击任务场景构建无人机集群装备体系应用本体, 导入Neo4j软件生成知识图谱。结果表明, 所提方法能够满足装备体系知识图谱构建需求。

关键词: 装备体系, 体系架构元模型, 知识图谱, 本体

Abstract:

Aiming to address the problems of low data standardization, inconsistent entities and entity relationships in the current military domain knowledge graph describing the equipment system, a method for constructing ontology model in the military field based on meta-model is proposed. The method uses the concept data model and logical data model under the framework of system architecture meta-model technology to define the equipment system domain ontology, thus generating the knowledge graph of the equipment system, avoiding the impact of inconsistent ontology of equipment systems in different branches and operation domains. An ontology application of unmanned aerial vehicle cluster equipment system is constructed for a cooperative strike mission scenario, and a knowledge graph is generated by importing into Neo4j software. The results show that the proposed method can meet the requirements for constructing a knowledge graph of equipment system.

Key words: equipment system, system architecture meta-model, knowledge graph, ontology

中图分类号:

E117

王暖臣, 王小龙, 穆歌, 李新津. 基于元模型的装备体系知识图谱构建[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(7): 2374-2382.

Nuanchen WANG, Xiaolong WANG, Ge MU, Xinjin LI. Construction of equipment system knowledge graph based on meta-model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(7): 2374-2382.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

图8

表2

表3

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 31

1	王博, 周文雅, 汪涛, 等. 多阶段任务装备体系作战能力评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (11): 3498- 3506.
	WANG B , ZHOU W Y , WANG T , et al. Operational capability evaluation of multi-phase mission equipment system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (11): 3498- 3506.
2	ZHENG X W, YU X, WEI S, et al. COVID19-OBKG: an ontology-based knowledge graph and web service for COVID19[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2021: 2456-2462.
3	KOZAKI K, KUSHIDA T, YAMAMOTO Y, et al. Buliding knowledge graph across different subdomains using interlinking ontology for biomedical concepts[C]//Proc. of the Joint International Conference of Semantic Technology, 2019: 182-190.
4	ANTONIAZZI F , VIOLA F . Building the semantic web of things through a dynamic ontology[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2019, 6 (6): 10560- 10579. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2939882
5	李肖, 刘德生. 面向武器装备体系知识图谱的本体构建[J]. 兵工自动化, 2022, 41 (3): 25- 41.
	LI X , LIU D S . Ontology construction for knowledge map of weapon equipment system[J]. Ordnance Indusry Automation, 2022, 41 (3): 25- 41.
6	周育伟, 杨朝宏, 王宏宇. 军事领域本体构建[J]. 计算机时代, 2022, 21 (9): 96- 99.
	ZHOU Y W , YANG C H , WANG H Y . Ontology construction of military field[J]. Computer Era, 2022, 21 (9): 96- 99.
7	CHEN Z K, ZHAO Y. The technology of military knowledge graph construction based on multiple open data source[C]//Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering, 2020: 1993-1997.
8	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Version 2.0[R]. Washington D.C. : Department of Defense, 2009.
9	United Kingdom Ministry of Defense. UK Ministry of Defense Framework (MoDAF) Version 1.2[R]. London: United Kingdom Ministry of Defense, 2008.
10	North Atlantic Treaty Organization Consultation Command and Control (C3) Board. The North Altlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Architecture Framework Version 3.0[R]. Brussels: North Altlantic Treaty Organization, 2007.
11	TOGAF 9.2. The open group architecture framework[S]. UK: The Open Group, 2018.
12	Object Management Group. Unified architecture framework profile (UAFP) Version1.0[EB/OL]. [2023-05-01]. http://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/20170515/UAFP-Profile.xmi.
13	KVSTER J M . Definition and validation of model transformation[J]. Software and System Modeling, 2006, 5 (3): 233- 259. doi: 10.1007/s10270-006-0018-8
14	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD Architecture Framework Version2.02. Changel Volume3: Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) meta-model ontology foundation and physical exchange specification[R]. Washington D.C. : Department of Defense, 2015.
15	谢文才, 罗雪山, 罗爱民. 基于元模型的军事信息系统体系结构建模方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2012, 34 (1): 82- 87.
	XIE W C , LUO X S , LUO A M . Meta-model based modeling of military information system architecture[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2012, 34 (1): 82- 87.
16	谭贤四, 朱刚, 王红, 等. 基于IDEAS的联合论证元模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37 (1): 85- 92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2015.01.15
	TAN X S , ZHU G , WANG H , et al. Joint demonstration meta-model based on IDEAS[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37 (1): 85- 92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2015.01.15
17	LV H N, XIE J, LIU K. Research on the architecture of shipborne UAV target indication command and control system based on DoDAF[C]//Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Intelligent Control, 2021: 162-171.
18	高悦, 茹乐, 迟文升, 等. 基于体系结构设计的空战系统任务元模型建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (11): 3229- 3238. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.23
	GAO Y , RU L , CHI W S , et al. Task meta-model modeling of air combat system based on system architecture design[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (11): 3229- 3238. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.23
19	SINGHAL A . Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings[J]. Official Google Blog, 2016, 6 (9): 15- 22.
20	REN H , CHEN Z W , LIANG X J , et al. Association hierarchical representation learning for plant-wide process monitoring by using multilevel knowledge graph[J]. IEEE Trans.on Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 4 (4): 636- 649.
21	LU X Y , WANG L F , JIANG Z J , et al. MRE: a translational knowledge graph completion model based on multiple relation embedding[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering: MBE, 2023, 20 (3): 5481- 5900.
22	QI Y L , MAI G C , ZHU R , et al. EVKG: an interlinked and interoperable electric vehicle knowledge for smart transportation system[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2023, 27, 949- 974.
23	ZHOU B , SHEN X W , LI X Y , et al. Semantic-aware event link reasoning over industrial knowledge graph embedding time series data[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2022, 61 (12): 4117- 4134.
24	DEBELLIS M , DUTTA B . From ontology to knowledge graph with agile methods: the case of COVID-19 CODO knowledge graph[J]. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 2022, 18 (5/6): 432- 452.
25	TAMAŠAUSKAITÉ G , GROTH P . Defining a knowledge graph development process through a systematic review[J]. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2022, 32 (1): 27.
26	HAO X J , JI Z , LI X H , et al. Construction and application of a Knowledge Graph[J]. Remote Sense, 2021, 13 (13): 2511.
27	DURÁN C K , MEDINA-RAMÍREZ R C , NIETO M A , et al. Process of building an educational and a military ontology for the Mexican context[J]. Research in Computing Science, 2019, 148 (5): 43- 50.
28	International Defense Enterprise Architecture Specification Group. International defense enterprise architecture specification[EB/OL]. [2023-05-10]. http://www.ideas-group.prg, 2011.
29	GHOSH S , SUNIL K C . A knowledge organization framework for influencing tourism-centered place-making[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2021, 78 (2): 157- 176.
30	SAAD M , ZHANG Y Z , TIAN J H , et al. A graph database for life cycle inventory using Neo4j[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 393, c136344.
31	YANG D S , LI Q , ZHU F H , et al. Parallel emergency management of incidents by integration OODA and PREA loops: the C2 mechanism and modes[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2023, 53 (4): 2160- 2172.

序号	概念1	概念2	关系类型	关系表述
1	执行者	活动	交叠关系	执行者执行装备体系活动
2	指南	活动	交叠关系	指南约束装备体系活动
3	资源	位置	属性	资源需要部署在某位置
4	资源	度量	属性	资源可以度量
5	活动	度量	属性	活动效果可以度量
6	活动	条件	属性	活动需要在一定条件下执行
7	人员	技能	属性	人员具备专业技能

概念名称		专用属性
资源	执行者	度量, 位置, 性能\技能, 编成序列, 数量, 职务
	物资	度量, 位置, 型号, 功能, 用途
	信息	度量, 存储地址, 信息格式, 交换格式, 用途
活动		度量, 条件, 能力需求, 期望效果, 远景
指南		信息, 名称, 适用范围, 时效

序号	关系名称	关系类型	含义	概念类
1	执行	交叠关系	执行者执行作战、保障等活动	执行者→活动
2	约束	交叠关系	指南约束活动/执行者	指南→活动、执行者
3	支持	交叠关系	物资支持执行者执行活动	物资→执行者
4	产生/消耗	交叠关系	活动产生/消耗资源	活动→资源
5	隶属	整体部分关系	人员隶属某组织	人员→组织
6	编成	整体部分关系	装备体系编成装备系统	装备系统→装备系统
7	顺承	前后关系	某活动紧接着另一活动执行	活动→活动
8	并发	前后关系	某活动与另一活动同时发生	活动→活动

[1]	陈志伟, 张罗庚, 方晓彤, 袁远, 崔巍巍, 兑红炎, 洪东跑. 装备体系可靠性概念、建模与预计方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(6): 1975-1985.
[2]	栾瑞鹏, 张静, 刘立坤. 面向装备试验鉴定领域数据治理的知识图谱本体构建[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(3): 1013-1020.
[3]	丛林虎, 陈宇奇, 陈黎明, 陈育良, 王朝. 基于多层级使命任务线程的总体任务成功性评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 616-630.
[4]	马兰, 孟诗君, 吴志军. 基于BERT与生成对抗的民航陆空通话意图挖掘[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 740-750.
[5]	姬泽阳, 杨春刚, 李富强, 欧阳颖, 刘祥林. 基于自然语言处理的意图驱动网络表征[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(1): 318-325.
[6]	曹嘉平, 欧萌歆, 李易珊, 姜江, 李际超. 岛礁防空电子对抗装备体系构建与效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2784-2792.
[7]	任浩亮, 张建超, 程会川. 基于SysML的武器装备体系能力需求建模分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2843-2851.
[8]	刘斌, 蚁佳才, 姚莉, 王炎娟, 丁兆云, 朱先强. 面向太空网络战威胁的态势感知本体建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(3): 745-754.
[9]	李童心, 王维平, 王涛, 李小波. 基于知识图谱的战略智能体BDI模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 119-126.
[10]	徐任杰, 宫琳, 谢剑, 刘欣, 杨克巍. 基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估及恢复策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 139-147.
[11]	罗弋洋, 赵青松, 李华超, 李勇, 孙建彬. 武器装备运用知识框架及建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 841-849.
[12]	庞维建, 李辉, 黄谦, 李朋, 马贤明. 基于本体的无人系统任务规划研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 908-920.
[13]	王姝婷, 刘晓冰, 周军华, 白朝阳, 翟翔. 基于本体的复杂产品维修工程案例知识表示及重用方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 557-568.
[14]	孔德鹏, 马溢清, 郑保华, 王琦, 张志强, 赵珍强. 面向不确定多任务场景的海上联合作战装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3775-3782.
[15]	蒋铁军, 于淳, 周成杰. 考虑期望体系效能衰减的舰艇编队等级修理计划优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3571-3578.