面向韧性的指挥信息系统节点重要性度量方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.04.20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为增强指挥信息系统韧性, 提升资源使用效费比, 必须把有限资源投入到对系统韧性影响最为显著的重要节点上。分析指挥信息系统韧性过程, 以攻击发生后指挥信息系统在规定恢复时间内的平均功能水平来评估其韧性; 建立指挥信息系统模型和节点模型, 根据各个节点韧性增加/减少相同比率时, 对系统韧性的影响程度来度量节点重要性, 提出基于蒙特卡罗仿真的节点重要性计算方法; 通过仿真实验对指挥信息系统韧性过程, 节点重要性度量方法及其性能、应用场景等进行验证。实验结果表明, 该度量方法能有效区分指挥信息系统节点的重要性, 且在单调性和精确性方面具有一定优势, 可应用于指挥信息系统规划设计、运维管理、应急抢修等阶段的韧性增强。

关键词: 指挥信息系统, 韧性, 节点重要性, 功能水平, 蒙特卡罗仿真

Abstract:

In order to enhance the resilience of the command information system and improve the efficiency cost ratio of resource utilization, limited resources must be invested in the important nodes that have the most significant impact on the system resilience. This paper analyzes the resilience process of the command information system and evaluates its resilience based on the average functional level of the command information system within the specified recovery time after the attack. The command information system model and node model are established. The node importance is measured according to the degree of impact on system resilience when the resilience of each node increases/decreases at the same rate. A node importance calculation method based on Monte Carlo simulation is proposed. Through simulation experiments, the resilience process of the command information system, the node importance measurement method and its performance, application scenarios are verified. The experimental results show that the measurement method can effectively distinguish the importance of the command information system nodes, and has certain advantages in monotony and accuracy. It can be used to enhance the resilience of the command information system in the planning and design, operation and maintenance management, emergency repair and other stages.

Key words: command information system, resilience, node importance, functional level, Monte Carlo simulation

中图分类号:

E211

岳地久, 李建华, 王哲. 面向韧性的指挥信息系统节点重要性度量方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(4): 1320-1329.

Dijiu YUE, Jianhua LI, Zhe WANG. Node importance measurement method of command information system for resilience[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(4): 1320-1329.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

图8

表2

图9

图10

参考文献 34

1	张刚宁, 易侃, 孙勇成, 等. 空军网络化指挥信息系统[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2019.
	ZHANG G N , YI K , SUN Y C , et al. Networked C4KISR system for Air Force[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2019.
2	刘涛, 白光晗, 陶俊勇, 等. 面向任务的复杂系统韧性评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (4): 1003- 1011.
	LIU T , BAI G H , TAO J Y , et al. Mission oriented resilience evaluation method for complex system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (4): 1003- 1011.
3	蓝羽石, 周光霞, 王珩, 等. 韧性指挥信息系统构建机理及实现研究[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2015, 1 (3): 284- 291.
	LAN Y S , ZHOU G X , WANG H , et al. Construction mechanism and implementation of resilient command information systems[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2015, 1 (3): 284- 291.
4	张志华, 王凡. 第五代指挥信息系统总体及其智能化技术设想[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2021, 43 (5): 1- 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3819.2021.05.001
	ZHANG Z H , WANG F . The fifth generation command information system and its intelligent technology[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2021, 43 (5): 1- 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3819.2021.05.001
5	焦天赐, 罗爱民, 李佳. 基于分层表示的指挥信息系统韧性评估方法[C]//第四届体系工程学术会议论文集, 2022: 330-336.
	JIAO T C, LUO A M, LI J. A method for resilience assessment of command information systems based on hierarchical representation[C]//Proc. of the 4th System Engineering Academic Conference, 2022: 330-336.
6	BAN K T , BUJACIC B S , PERAK B . Semi-local integration measure of node importance[J]. Mathematics, 2022, 10 (3): 405. doi: 10.3390/math10030405
7	LIU J Q , LI X R , DONG J C . A survey on network node ranking algorithms: representative methods, extensions, and applications[J]. Science China-Technological Sciences, 2021, 64 (3): 451- 461. doi: 10.1007/s11431-020-1683-2
8	YANG Y Z , WANG X , CHEN Y , et al. Identifying key nodes in complex networks based on global structure[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 32904- 32913. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973241
9	QIU L Q , ZHANG J Y , TIAN X B . Ranking influential nodes in complex networks based on local and global structures[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2021, 51 (7): 4394- 4407. doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-02132-1
10	ZHANG D , KANG Y X , JI L , et al. An algorithm based on improved K-shell key node identification of the power grid integrated with renewable energy[J]. Electronics, 2023, 12 (1): 85.
11	XIAO F , LI J , WEI B . Cascading failure analysis and critical node identification in complex network[J]. Physica A, 2022, 596, 127117. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127117
12	LI Y C , CAI W H , LI Y , et al. Key node ranking in complex networks: a novel entropy and mutual information-based app-roach[J]. Entropy, 2020, 22 (52): 1- 23.
13	XI Y , CUI X H . Identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on information entropy and relationship strength[J]. Entropy, 2023, 25 (5): 754. doi: 10.3390/e25050754
14	ZHANG Y , LU Y , YANG G Z , et al. Multi-attribute decision making method for node importance metric in complex network[J]. Applied Sciences-Basel, 2022, 12 (4): 1944. doi: 10.3390/app12041944
15	YIN R R , YIN X L , CUI M D , et al. Node importance evaluation method based on multi-attribute decision-making model in wireless sensor networks[J]. Wireless Communications and Networking, 2019, 2019, 2960- 2973.
16	SHEIKHAH A , VEISI F , SHEIKHAH A , et al. A multi-attribute method for ranking influential nodes in complex networks[J]. PLoS ONE, 2022, 17 (11): 278129.
17	徐任杰, 宫琳, 谢剑, 等. 基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估及恢复策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (1): 139- 147.
	XU R J , GONG L , XIE J , et al. Resilience-based link importance evaluation and recovery strategy for equipment system-of-systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (1): 139- 147.
18	罗金亮, 金家才, 王雷. 基于功能贡献度的网络化防空节点重要性评价方法[J]. 计算机科学, 2018, 45 (2): 175-180, 202.
	LUO J L , JIN J C , WANG L . Evaluation method for node importance in air defense networks based on functional contribution degree[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45 (2): 175-180, 202.
19	潘星, 蒋卓, 杨艳京. 基于弹性的体系组件重要度及恢复策略[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43 (9): 1713- 1720.
	PAN X , JIANG Z , YANG Y J . Resilience-based component importance and recovery strategy for system-of-systems[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43 (9): 1713- 1720.
20	PAN X , WANG H , YANG Y J , et al. Resilience based importance measure analysis for SoS[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (5): 920- 930. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.05.10
21	LI R Y , GAO Y . On the component resilience importance measures for infrastructure systems[J]. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 2022, 36, 100481. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100481
22	CIMELLARO G P , REINHORN A M , BRUNEAU M . Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32 (11): 3639- 3649. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
23	SEYEDMOHSEN H , KASH B , JOSE E R . A review of definitions and measures of system resilience[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 145, 47- 61. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
24	BRUNEAU S E , EGUCHI R T , LEE G C , et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19 (4): 733- 752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497
25	李瑞莹, 杜时佳, 康锐. 复杂系统弹性建模与评估[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2019.
	LI R Y , DU S J , KANG R . Modeling and evaluation of complex system resilience[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2019.
26	LI R Y , TIAN X Y , YU L , et al. A systematic disturbance analysis method for resilience evaluation: a case study in material handling systems[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11 (5): 1447. doi: 10.3390/su11051447
27	蓝羽石, 王珩, 张刚宁, 等. C4ISR系统网络中心体系架构[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2013, 4 (6): 1-6, 26.
	LAN Y S , WANG H , ZHANG G N , et al. Network-centric architecture for C4ISR system[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2013, 4 (6): 1-6, 26.
28	浣顺启, 方哲梅, 王剑波. 基于功能依赖网的体系效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44 (7): 2191- 2200.
	HUAN S Q , FANG Z M , WANG J B . System-of-systems effectiveness evaluation method based on functional dependency network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44 (7): 2191- 2200.
29	CHANG S E , SHINOZUKA M . Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2004, 20 (3): 739- 755. doi: 10.1193/1.1775796
30	YANG M , SUN H , GENG S Y . On the quantitative resilience assessment of complex engineered systems[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 174, 941- 950. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.05.019
31	郭子薇, 燕飞. 基于蒙特卡罗仿真的全自动运行系统弹性评估方法研究[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2021, 34 (6): 86- 91.
	GUO Z W , YAN F . Resilience evaluation method for FAO based on Monte-Carlo simulation[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transition, 2021, 34 (6): 86- 91.
32	LIN Y K . Stochastic flow networks via multiple paths under time threshold and budget constraint[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2011, 62 (6): 2629- 2638.
33	BAE J , KIM S . Identifying and ranking influential spreaders in complex networks by neighborhood coreness[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2014, 395, 549- 559.
34	ALILI M , PERC M . Information cascades in complex networks[J]. Journal of Complex Networks, 2017, 5 (5): 665- 693.

节点序号	节点名称	遭受攻击概率/%	节点功能水平下降最大值	节点恢复持续时间/h
1	区域控制中心	4	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
2	区域情报中心	3.5	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
3	雷达1旅指挥所	3	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
4	雷达2旅指挥所	2	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
5	雷达1	2	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
6	雷达2	2	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
7	雷达3	2	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
8	雷达4	2	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
9	地导1旅指挥所	3	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
10	地导2旅指挥所	2	U(0, 0.7)	ln N(2, 4)
⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮
23	一级通信节点	3.5	U(0, 0.9)	ln N(2, 4)
24	一级通信节点	3.5	U(0, 0.9)	ln N(2, 4)
25	二级通信节点	2	U(0, 0.9)	ln N(2, 4)
26	二级通信节点	2	U(0, 0.9)	ln N(2, 4)
27	三级通信节点	2	U(0, 0.9)	ln N(2, 4)
⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮

节点重要性度量方法	单调性
本文方法	1
文献[25]—基于结构韧性的度量方法	0.426 5
节点韧性增加/减少相同数值的度量方法	0.428 6

[1]	刘涛, 王沙沙, 张驰, 白光晗, 陶俊勇. 考虑韧性的无人机集群自组织区域覆盖方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(3): 942-952.
[2]	焦志强, 易侃, 张杰勇, 姚佩阳. 不平衡数据下基于SVM增量学习的指挥信息系统状态监控方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(3): 992-1003.
[3]	徐任杰, 宫琳, 谢剑, 刘欣, 杨克巍. 基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估及恢复策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 139-147.
[4]	刘涛, 白光晗, 陶俊勇, 张云安, 方依宁. 面向任务的复杂系统韧性评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 1003-1011.
[5]	王双川, 贾希胜, 胡起伟, 曹文斌, 马云飞. 合成部队多阶段作战任务成功概率仿真评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(3): 763-772.
[6]	王许煜, 胡敏, 张学阳, 赵玉龙, 李玖阳. 基于Petri网的导航卫星星座备份策略分析评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(2): 434-442.
[7]	田相轩, 石志强. 基于改进型生成对抗网络的指挥信息系统模拟数据生成算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 163-170.
[8]	丁峰, 周芳, 赵鑫, 于靖. Cyber攻击下韧性信息服务云环境能力评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(12): 2722-2728.
[9]	蔡芝明, 金家善, 陈砚桥. 基于关键性的备件库存配置优化模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(8): 1765-1773.
[10]	陈顶, 方志耕, 刘思峰. 基于灰色生灭过程的可修部件备件需求预测模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(12): 2709-2715.
[11]	刘佳，方宁，谢拥军，王宝发. 姿态扰动情况下的目标动态RCS分布特性[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(4): 775-781.
[12]	骆明珠，陈颖，康锐. 基于PoF模型的电子产品可靠性参数计算方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(4): 795-801.