基于DoDAF的航空装备智能保障系统体系结构建模

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.02.27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

保障系统结构建模是发展和构建新一代航空装备智能保障系统的重要基础。航空装备保障系统涉及保障要素多、交联关系复杂, 需从系统工程的角度开展顶层设计, 并采用统一的结构框架对其体系结构进行建模表征。引入美国国防部架构框架(Departmeant of Defense Architecture Framework, DoDAF)体系结构框架, 提出基于“概念-任务-能力”的体系结构开发序列, 构建航空装备智能保障系统的能力、保障活动、各保障要素的信息交互及组织关系等视图模型, 得到“能力层-需求层-技术层”之间的对应关系。该方法能够全面地描述航空装备智能保障系统体系结构, 提高不同保障要素之间的互操作性, 并将其转化为具体的设计要求, 可为航空装备智能保障系统开发提供支持。

关键词: 航空装备, 智能保障系统, 美国国防部架构框架, 基于模型的系统工程

Abstract:

The architecture modeling of support system is an important foundation for the development and construction of a new generation of aviation equipment intelligent support system. The aviation equipment support system involves many support elements and complex cross-linking relationships, it is necessary to carry out top-level design from the perspective of system engineering, and use a unified structural framework to model and characterize its architecture. The Departmeant of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) architecture framework is introduced, and the architecture development sequence based on "concept-task-capability" is proposed. The view models of capabilities, support activities, information interaction and organization relationship of each support element of the aviation equipment intelligent support system are constructed, and the corresponding relationship between "capability layer-demand layer-technology layer" is obtained. This method can comprehensively describe the architecture of aviation equipment intelligent support system, improve the interoperability among different support elements, and translate it into specific design requirements, which can provide support for the development of aviation equipment intelligent support system.

Key words: aviation equipment, intelligent support system, Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF), model-based systems engineering (MBSE)

中图分类号:

E926

苗学问, 董骁雄, 钱征文, 胡杨, 李牧东. 基于DoDAF的航空装备智能保障系统体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 640-648.

Xuewen MIAO, Xiaoxiong DONG, Zhengwen QIAN, Yang HU, Mudong LI. Architecture modeling of aviation equipment intelligent support system based on DoDAF[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(2): 640-648.

图/表 9

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 30

1	GJB451A-2005. 可靠性维修性保障性术语[S]. 北京: 中国人民解放军总装备部.
	GJB451A-2005. Reliability maintainability and supportability terms[S]. Beijing: General Armament Department of the Chinese People's Liberation Army.
2	DURMAZ M . Defense technology development: does every country need an organization like DARPA?[J]. Innovation, 2016, 18 (1): 2- 12. doi: 10.1080/14479338.2016.1163235
3	ZHOU J , LI P G , ZHOU Y H . Toward new-generation intelligent manufacturing[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4 (1): 11- 20. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.01.002
4	WOLFE F . F-35 ALIS to ODIN transition contract expected early next year[J]. Defense Daily, 2021, 10 (7): 1- 2.
5	宁莹, 季自力. 人工智能应用对装备保障的影响及对策[J]. 科技资讯, 2022, 20 (17): 33- 35.
	NING Y , JI Z L . Influence of AI application on equipment support and countermeasures[J]. Science & Technology Information, 2022, 20 (17): 33- 35.
6	苗学问, 胡杨, 钱征文, 等. 航空装备智能保障系统论证研究[J]. 测控技术, 2020, 39 (12): 22- 25.
	MIAO X W , HU Y , QIAN Z W , et al. Argumentation research of aviation equipment intelligent support system[J]. Observation and Control Technology, 2020, 39 (12): 22- 25.
7	方伟光, 聂兆伟, 刘宸宁, 等. 数字孪生驱动的武器装备智能保障技术研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (4): 1247- 1260.
	FANG W G , NIE Z W , LIU C N , et al. Research on digital twin driven intelligent weaponry support technology[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (4): 1247- 1260.
8	周扬, 曾照洋, 周岩, 等. 航空装备智能保障系统研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2020, 31 (12): 68- 72.
	ZHOU Y , ZENG Z Y , ZHOU Y , et al. Research on intelligent support system of aviation equipment[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2020, 31 (12): 68- 72.
9	崔广宇, 谢娜. 航空装备智能保障思考[J]. 测控技术, 2020, 39 (12): 28- 33.
	CUI G Y , XIE N . Consideration of intelligent support for aviation equipment[J]. Measurement & Control Technology, 2020, 39 (12): 28- 33.
10	USA Department of Defense. Quadrennial defense review report[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2001.
11	GE B , HIPEL K W , FANG L , et al. An interactive portfolio decision analysis approach for system-of-systems architecting using the graph model for conflict resolution[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2014, 44 (10): 1328- 1346. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2014.2309321
12	KAUL A , WU B . A capabilities-based perspective on target selection in acquisitions[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37 (7): 1220- 1239. doi: 10.1002/smj.2389
13	DEKKER A H . Applying social network analysis concepts to military C⁴ISR architecture[J]. Connections, 2002, 24 (3): 93- 103.
14	LI J F , SUN B C , DAI Z . Research on C⁴ISR requirement demonstrating method based on system configuration[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1802 (4): 042084. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1802/4/042084
15	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD architecture framework version 1.0[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2003.
16	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. Department of defence architecture framework version 2.0[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2009.
17	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD architecture framework version 2.02. Changel volume: overview and concepts[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2015: 20-26.
18	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. Department of defense architecture framework vertion 2.02. Changel volume 2: arhitecture data and models[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2015.
19	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. Department of defense architecture framework vertion 2.02. Changel volume 3: DoDAF meta-model ontology foundation and physical exchange specification[R]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2015.
20	Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. Department of defense architecture framework vertion 2.02. Changel volume 4: DoDAF journal[R]. Washington DC: Department o1 Defense, 2015.
21	HAO I J . Study on the DoDAF-based UUV formation system collaborative anti-submarine architecture modeling[J]. Journal of Engineering School, 2017, 32 (16): 947- 951.
22	STOEWER H , LIN C . Results from the panel on "MBSE transition towards the digital enterprise-where do go from here?"[J]. Insight, 2019, 22 (1): 51- 53. doi: 10.1002/inst.12239
23	HULDT T , STENIU I . State-of-practice survey of model-based systems engineering[J]. Systems Engineering, 2019, 22 (2): 134- 145. doi: 10.1002/sys.21466
24	KHARRAT M , PENAS O , PLATEAUX R , et al. Integration of electromagnetic constraint as of the conceptual design through an MBSE approach[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 15 (1): 7- 44.
25	LIU W W, LIU F S, XU D, et al. Analysis of joint capabilities integration and development system of U.S. Army[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Quality, 2012: 1355-1359.
26	SCHLOMER D E , CAMPBELL D G . Strategies to streamline the U.S. Army's acquisition approval process[J]. International Journal of Applied Management & Technology, 2018, 17 (1): 59- 67.
27	ZHANG Y W, CUI W X, LUO Y F. Military task completion evaluation method based on DoDAF model and improved FDNA[C]//Proc. of the 34th China Control and Decision Conference, 2022: 6.
28	YANG W J , HOU J F , LIU M F . Research on demand analysis method of military civilian integration medical equipment based on DoDAF[J]. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 2021, 12 (8): 17- 18.
29	AGHAMOHAMMADPOUR A , MAHDIPOUR E , ATTARZADEH I . Architecting threat hunting system based on the DoDAF framework[J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2022, 79 (4): 4215- 4242.
30	WANG C W . Study on vessel maintenance support system modelling based on DoDAF[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 692, 012051.

模型	名称	模型含义	描述角度	形式
AV-1	总体概要模型	智能保障系统总体描述	总体架构	文字型
AV-2	集成字典	智能保障系统名词解释和缩略语	总体架构	文字型
OV-1	顶层概念图	直观展现智能保障业务的顶层目标和基本运用方式	业务功能	图片型
OV-2	资源流描述	描述智能保障系统内部的信息交联关系, 重点表达保障节点间的互连关系, 即需求线	业务信息	图片型
OV-4	组织关系模型	描述各保障要素的组织指挥关系	组织结构	结构型
OV-5b	保障活动模型	描述静态的智能保障活动和信息流逻辑流程	业务功能	行为型
OV-6c	事件跟踪描述	描述动态的智能保障活动和信息逻辑流程, 并能推动相关模型/仿真模块的分项演算	业务过程	行为型
CV-1	能力愿景	智能保障能力的整体构想	总体能力	图片型
CV-2	能力分类模型	智能保障能力指标框架	指标框架	图片型

[1]	董梦如, 王国新, 鲁金直, 马君达, 阎艳. 基于WordCloud技术的MBSE发展态势研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(2): 534-548.
[2]	任浩亮, 张建超, 程会川. 基于SysML的武器装备体系能力需求建模分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2843-2851.
[3]	黄冉, 彭祺擘, 武新峰, 倪庆. 基于DoDAF的载人登月体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(7): 2131-2137.
[4]	高金艳, 汪路元, 潘忠石, 王虎妹. 火星维护与管理装置的MBSE架构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(5): 1441-1450.
[5]	武新峰, 彭祺擘, 黄冉, 李静琳. 基于MBSE的运载火箭上升段逃逸救生策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(4): 1121-1126.
[6]	彭祺擘, 张海联. 基于模型的载人航天工程需求分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(11): 3532-3543.
[7]	史文卿, 王海峰, 陈海昕. 战斗机无人机编组协同系统需求捕获与验证[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 108-118.
[8]	卢元杰, 刘志敏, 孙智孝, 阚东. 基于模型的无人机系统架构综合评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1239-1245.
[9]	丁刚, 张琳, 崔利杰, 张亮, 李新春. 航空装备单元维修保障仿真评估方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1246-1255.
[10]	廖万斌, 曹云峰, 王新尧. 面向复杂系统需求分析的DSL构建[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3443-3454.
[11]	范秋岑, 毕文豪, 张安, 王文浩. 民用飞机高度控制系统MBSE建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 164-171.
[12]	焦洪臣, 雷勇, 张宏宇, 张国斌, 王耀东. 基于MBSE的航天器系统建模分析与设计研制方法探索[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2516-2525.
[13]	李德林, 毕文豪, 张安, 范秋岑. 基于MBSE的民机研制过程管理[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2209-2220.
[14]	王雨农, 毕文豪, 张安, 詹超. 基于DoDAF的民机MBSE研制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3579-3585.
[15]	王文浩, 毕文豪, 张安, 范秋岑. 基于MBSE的民机系统功能建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(10): 2884-2892.