基于多接收机协同的无源测向及SAR欺骗干扰方法研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.12.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对合成孔径雷达(synthetic aperture radar, SAR)实施欺骗干扰, 干扰方通常需要预先侦察出SAR载机平台速度、方位向慢时间、SAR载机平台到干扰机的最近斜距以及干扰机自身位置等关键参数, 而获取这些参数通常需要复杂的侦察设备。针对这一问题, 提出了一种基于多接收机协同的无源测向及SAR欺骗干扰方法, 利用干扰机和接收机的布站以及接收机间的到达时差(time difference of arrival, TDOA)信息, 有效地解决了需复杂设备侦察上述关键参数的难题, 简化了干扰系统的配置。根据TDOA信息, 可计算出干扰机相对于SAR载机平台的俯仰角和水平方位角, 从而实现对SAR载机平台的无源测向。在此基础上, 提出了一种对SAR实施欺骗干扰的算法, 并与现有基于多接收机协同的SAR欺骗干扰方法进行了对比。对比结果表明，随着生成的虚假目标距离干扰机的距离增大, 所提方法比现有方法的目标聚焦效果更好, 且实时性更强。

关键词: 合成孔径雷达, 欺骗干扰, 到达时差, 最小条件数, 无源测向

Abstract:

When the deception jamming is implemented on synthetic aperture radar (SAR), the jammer usually needs to obtain some key parameters in advance, such as the speed of carrier platform of SAR, the slow time of azimuth, the nearest oblique distance from the jammer to the carrier platform of SAR, and the self-position of the jammer, etc. However, the acquisition of these key parameters above usually needs complex reconnaissance equipments. In response to this problem, a passive direction-finding and SAR deception jamming method based on multi-receiver coondination is proposed in this paper. This method uses the arrangement of jammers and receivers and the time difference of arrival (TDOA) information between the receivers, and effectively solves the problem of the requirement for complex equipment to reconnoitre the above key parameters, and greatly simplifies the configuration of the interference system. According to the TDOA information, the pitch angle and horizontal azimuth of jammer relative to the carrier platform of SAR can be calculated, so as to realize the passive direction-finding of carrier platform of SAR. On this basis, a deception jamming algorithm against SAR is proposed and compared with the existing deception jamming algorithm against SAR based on multi-receiver coondination. The result shows that, with the increase of distance between the generated false target and the jammer, the false target focusing effect and real-time performance of the proposed method are better than that of the existing methods.

Key words: synthetic aperture radar (SAR), deception jamming, time difference of arrival (TDOA), minimum condition number, passive direction-finding

中图分类号:

TN95

李永祯, 刘业民, 邢世其, 黄大通, 陆正文. 基于多接收机协同的无源测向及SAR欺骗干扰方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(12): 3792-3805.

Yongzhen LI, Yemin LIU, Shiqi XING, Datong HUANG, Zhengwen LU. Study on passive direction-finding and SAR deception jamming method based on multi-receiver cooperation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(12): 3792-3805.

图/表 16

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表2

图10

表3

图11

图12

表4

参考文献 11

1	赵博. 合成孔径雷达欺骗干扰方法研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2015.
	ZHAO B. Study on methods of synthetic aperture radar deception jamming[D]. Xi'an: University of Electronic Science and Technology, 2015.
2	WALTER W G . Synthetic aperture radar and electronic warfare[M]. US: Artech House Inc, 1993.
3	YANG K , MA F , RAN D , et al. Fast generation of deceptive jamming signal against spaceborne SAR based on spatial frequency domain interpolation[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, 99, 1- 15.
4	YANG K , YE W , WU X , et al. Fast generation of deceptive jamming signal against space-borne SAR[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2020, 13, 5580- 5596. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3025217
5	LI Y , PANG H , LI L , et al. Research on rebound jamming against multi-input multi-output synthetic aperture radar[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, (99): 1- 12.
6	RAN J H , LI X H , SHEN Y . A jamming method against bistatic SAR based on modulation theory[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (3): 504- 510. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.03.08
7	JI P H , DAI D H , XING S Q , et al. A new three-dimension deceptive scene generation against single-pass multibaseline InSAR based on multiple transponders[J]. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 20 (4): 1- 15.
8	吴晓芳. SAR-GMTI运动调制干扰技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2009.
	WU X F. Study on motion modulation jamming techniques against SAR-GMTI[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2009.
9	SAEEDI J . A new hybrid method for synthetic aperture radar deceptive jamming[J]. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, 2019, 4 (1): 1- 14.
12	ZHOU F , TIAN T , ZHAO B , et al. Deception against near-field synthetic aperture radar using networked jammers[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2019, 55 (6): 3365- 3377. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2019.2906414
13	SUN Q Y , SHU T , YU K B , et al. A novel deceptive jamming method against two-channel SAR-GMTI based on two jammers[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2019, 19 (14): 5600- 5610.
14	ZHOU F , ZHAO B , TAO M L , et al. A large scene deceptive jamming method for space-borne SAR[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51 (8): 4486- 4495.
15	刘永才. 对多模式高分辨合成孔径雷达的大场景欺骗干扰技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2017.
	LIU Y C. Study on large-area deceptive jamming against multi-mode high-resolution synthetic aperture radar[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2017.
10	ZHAO B , ZHOU F , BAO Z . Deception jamming for squint SAR based on multiple receivers[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing, 2015, 8 (8): 3988- 3998.
11	ZHAO B , HUANG L , ZHOU F , et al. Performance improvement of deception jamming against SAR based on minimum condition number[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing, 2017, 10 (3): 1039- 1055.

参数	符号	取值
平台速度/(m·s^-1)	v_a	200
信号载频/GHz	f_c	10
信号带宽/MHz	B	100
信号脉宽/μs	T_p	5
场景中心斜距/km	R₀	10
平台飞行高度/km	H	8
方位向采样频率/Hz	PRF	500

品质指标	目标序号
品质指标	P₁	P₂	P₃	P₄	P₅	P₆	P₇	P₈	P₉
真目标距离向误差/m	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
假目标距离向误差/m	0.085	0.081	0.084	0.087	0.080	0.084	0.086	0.083	0.082
真目标方位向误差/m	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
假目标方位向误差/m	0.011	-0.011	-0.202	0.013	-0.011	-0.105	0.013	0.013	-0.018
真目标方位向IRW/m	0.889	0.890	0.889	0.885	0.879	0.885	0.893	0.899	0.893
假目标方位向IRW/m	1.041	1.099	1.049	1.099	1.103	1.095	1.086	1.091	1.086
真目标方位向PSLR/dB	-13.905	-13.059	-13.903	-12.987	-13.020	-13.079	-13.177	-13.301	-13.185
假目标方位向PSLR/dB	-13.428	-13.047	-13.275	-12.845	-12.141	-12.921	-12.549	-12.396	-12.229
真目标方位向ISLR/dB	-11.961	-11.762	-11.867	-11.926	-11.574	-11.919	-11.647	-11.895	-11.748
假目标方位向ISLR/dB	-11.908	-11.711	-11.914	-11.819	-11.299	-11.805	-11.466	-11.373	-11.410

品质指标	目标序号
品质指标	P₁	P₅	P₉
目标方位向IRW(OLR)/m	1.111	1.081	1.047
目标方位向IRW(NOLR)	1.212	1.201	1.166
目标方位向PSLR(OLR)	-13.000	-12.965	-12.969
目标方位向PSLR(NOLR)	-12.783	-12.858	-12.966
目标方位向ISLR(OLR)	-12.344	-12.441	-12.247
目标方位向ISLR(NOLR)	-12.000	-11.643	-11.832

品质指标	目标序号
品质指标	P₁	P₂	P₃	P₄	P₅	P₆	P₇	P₈	P₉
虚假目标距离向误差/m	-1.001	-0.001	0.832	0.165	-0.001	-0.001	1.165	-0.001	-1.168
	-0.168	-0.001	-0.001	-0.001	-0.001	0.165	-0.168	-0.001	-0.168
	0.165	-0.001	-0.168	0.165	-0.001	-0.168	0.165	-0.001	-0.168
虚假目标方位向误差/m	0.276	0.276	0.276	0.109	0.109	0.109	-0.224	-0.224	-0.224
	0.776	0.276	0.776	0.442	0.109	0.442	0.776	0.276	0.776
	0.109	0.109	0.109	0.109	0.109	0.109	0.109	0.109	0.109
虚假目标方位向IRW/m	1.319	1.251	1.294	1.319	1.237	1.333	1.346	1.226	1.313
	1.338	1.251	1.280	1.287	1.239	1.286	1.345	1.215	1.286
	1.041	1.099	1.049	1.099	1.003	1.095	1.086	1.091	1.086
虚假目标方位向PSLR/dB	-13.297	-12.986	-12.149	-12.966	-13.032	-12.857	-11.481	-12.320	-12.404
	-13.177	-12.998	-13.258	-12.976	-13.115	-11.287	-11.917	-12.401	-12.588
	-13.428	-13.047	-13.275	-12.845	-13.141	-12.921	-12.549	-12.396	-12.229
虚假目标方位向ISLR/dB	-9.506	-11.695	-9.803	-11.515	-11.790	-11.835	-9.283	-11.277	-9.823
	-11.957	-11.530	-11.958	-11.086	-11.817	-11.091	-11.028	-11.183	-11.086
	-11.908	-11.711	-11.914	-11.819	-11.899	-11.805	-11.466	-11.373	-11.410

[1]	刘鸣谦, 徐仲秋, 陈天成, 张冰尘, 吴一戎. 基于L₁ & TV正则化的低过采样Staggered SAR成像方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2718-2726.
[2]	王中宝, 尹奎英. 基于联合域滤波的无人机载SAR图像块效应抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(9): 2768-2776.
[3]	寇鹏, 刘永祥, 张弛, 李玮杰, 张双辉, 霍凯. 序列ISAR像复杂结构航天器在轨姿态估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(8): 2438-2445.
[4]	王宁, 贺鹏超, 卢景月, 刘曦. 基于DOA估计的前视多通道SAR成像方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(8): 2471-2478.
[5]	王鹏飞, 詹珩艺, 孙洪忠. 双基前视雷达二维空变补偿频域成像方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(7): 1990-2001.
[6]	朱瀚神, 胡文华, 郭宝锋, 焦丽婷, 朱晓秀, 朱常安. 双基地ISAR稀疏孔径机动目标MTRC补偿成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(7): 2022-2030.
[7]	汪俊澎, 邢世其, 李永祯, 黄大通, 宋少秋. 基于时频交叉乘积的调频连续波SAR干扰方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(6): 1651-1657.
[8]	杨磊, 夏亚波, 廖仙华, 毛欣瑶, 窦宇宸, 杨桓. 双层稀疏贝叶斯学习ISAR超分辨成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(5): 1371-1379.
[9]	吴其华, 赵锋, 王俊杰, 徐志明, 肖顺平. 基于编码相位调制的ISAR图像特征控制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(4): 1000-1007.
[10]	张冬冬, 王春平, 付强. 基于特征增强网络的SAR图像舰船目标检测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(4): 1032-1039.
[11]	李相海, 杨志伟, 贺顺, 廖桂生, 韩超垒, 姜岩. 基于路网信息辅助的多星编队系统SAR-GMTI动目标径向速度估计与重定位方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(3): 629-637.
[12]	朱晓秀, 刘利民, 胡文华, 郭宝锋, 史林, 朱瀚神. 基于GTD模型的多视角多频带ISAR融合成像[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(3): 726-735.
[13]	贺翥祯, 李敏, 苟瑶, 杨爱涛. 改进YOLOv5的合成孔径雷达图像舰船目标检测方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(12): 3743-3753.
[14]	周剑雄, 朱永锋, 陈冀, 吴宏铭, 吴堃, 张永杰. SAR图像辅助的雷达目标距离像检测识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(11): 3428-3436.
[15]	郭媛, 索志勇, 王婷婷, 丁智泉. 弹载双基前视SAR构型参数优化设计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(11): 3449-3454.