基于空间信息表征的勾股模糊集空间距离测度

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.11.19

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

勾股模糊集拓展了直觉模糊集的信息表征内容, 具有体现更大信息空间的优势, 构建勾股模糊集的距离测度是实施勾股模糊型决策的核心环节。本文首先分析了现有4种勾股模糊集距离测度的缺陷, 构建了融合隶属度、非隶属度、犹豫度和自信度的勾股模糊集空间信息表征模型, 进而提出了基于勾股模糊集空间质心的距离测度。其次, 拓展了距离测度的具体特性, 比较了所提距离测度模型在体现犹豫度和解决反直觉情形方面的优势。最后, 模式识别和医疗诊断等应用研究证明了所提距离测度的准确性和优越性。

关键词: 勾股模糊集, 距离测度, 空间质心, 自信度

Abstract:

Pythagorean fuzzy set expands the information representation content of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and has the advantage of reflecting larger information space. Constructing the distance measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets is the core link of implementing Pythagorean fuzzy decision-making. Firstly, this paper deeply analyzes the defects of the existing four distance measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets, establishes a spatial information representation model of Pythagorean fuzzy sets integrating the membership degree and nonmembership degree, hesitation degree and strength of commitment, and then puts forward a novel distance measure based on the spatial centroid of Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Secondly, the specific properties of the proposed distance measure are extended, and the advantages of this distance measure model in reflecting hesitation and solving counterintuitive situations are proven and compared. Finally, the application research of pattern recognition and medical diagnosis verifies the accuracy and superiority of this distance measure between Pythagorean fuzzy sets.

Key words: Pythagorean fuzzy sets, distance measure, space centroid, strength of commitment

中图分类号:

C934

王嘉丽, 江文奇, 陶希闻. 基于空间信息表征的勾股模糊集空间距离测度[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(11): 3524-3531.

Jiali WANG, Wenqi JIANG, Xiwen TAO. Spatial distance measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on spatial information representation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(11): 3524-3531.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

表1

基本性质及扩展性质的比较分析"

性质	对比文献
性质	文献[30]		文献[31]		文献[32]		文献[33]
性质3	a(0.26, 0.22, )		a(0.70, 0.35)		a(0.18, 0.36)		a(0.36, 0.72)
	b(0.17, 0.22, )		b(0.50, 0.25)		b(0.28, 0.56)		b(0.06, 0.12)
	c(0.58, 0.22, )		c(0.04, 0.02)		c(0.30, 0.60)		c(0.38, 0.76)
	(0.036, 0.132, 0.167)	√	(0.099, 0.305, 0.209)	√	(0.093, 0.113, 0.019)	√	(0.280, 0.022, 0.301)	√
	(0.039, 0.269, 0.308)	×	(0.158, 0.522, 0.364)	×	(0.159, 0.184, 0.033)	√	(0.408, 0.048, 0.456)	×
性质5	a(0.60, 0.55)		a(0.93, 0.18)		a(0.91, 0.34)		a(0.69, 0.65)
	b(0.16, 0.57)		b(0.04, 0.21)		b(0.16, 0.39)		b(0.07, 0.66)
	c(0.16, 0.64)		c(0.02, 0.57)		c(0.16, 0.52)		c(0.05, 0.73)
	(0.182, 0.241, 0.154)	√	(0.380, 0.408, 0.148)	√	(0.329, 0.331, 0.054)	√	(0.262, 0.268, 0.032)	√
	(0.541, 0.498, 0.313)	×	(0.690, 0.681, 0.258)	×	(0.564, 0.559, 0.084)	×	(0.504, 0.496, 0.069)	×
拓展性质1	a(0.871, 0.259)		a(0.948, 0.092)		a(0.829, 0.405)		a(0.690, 0.340)
	b(0.295, 0.106)		b(0.417, 0.067)		b(0.144, 0.355)		b(0.686, 0.337)
	c(0.218, 0.865)		c(0.429, 0.893)		c(0.168, 0.718)		c(0.466, 0.604)
	(0.261, 0.356, 0.321)	√	(0.244, 0.383, 0.365)	√	(0.295, 0.298, 0.154)	√	(0.002, 0.139, 0.138)	√
	(0.701, 0.696, 0.718)	×	(0.376, 0.579, 0.588)	×	(0.504, 0.485, 0.565)	×	(0.005, 0.419, 0.420)	×
拓展性质2	a(0.70, 0.27)		a(0.88, 0.20)		a(0.31, 0.89)		a(0.85, 0.19)
	b(0.75, 0.40)		b(0.27, 0.37)		b(0.38, 0.78)		b(0.61, 0.30)
	c(0.24, 0.74)		c(0.39, 0.66)		c(0.54, 0.81)		c(0.66, 0.38)
	(0.062, 0.263, 0.246)	√	(0.269, 0.272, 0.135)	√	(0.061, 0.10, 0.084)	√	(0.112, 0.116, 0.041)	√
	(0.138, 0.455, 0.458)	×	(0.449, 0.429, 0.222)	×	(0.105, 0.139, 0.153)	×	(0.346, 0.095, 0.330)	×
拓展性质3	a(0.91, 0.35)		a(0.66, 0.42)		a(0.35, 0.25)		a(0.83, 0.51)
	b(0.47, 0.47)		b(0.60, 0.47)		b(0.26, 0.27)		b(0.82, 0.33)
	c(0.48, 0.41)		c(0.39, 0.14)		c(0.15, 0.05)		c(0.57, 0.47)
	(0.206, 0.210, 0.025)	√	(0.032, 0.166, 0.165)	√	(0.037, 0.114, 0.099)	√	(0.087, 0.138, 0.122)	√
	(0.576, 0.564, 0.0487)	×	(0.051, 0.277, 0.281)	×	(0.072, 0.199, 0.203)	×	(0.196, 0.298, 0.355)	×
拓展性质4	a(0.87, 0.42)		a(0.48, 0.22)		a(0.86, 0.07)		a(0.47, 0.20)
	b(0.45, 0.50)		b(0.17, 0.13)		b(0.13, 0.18)		b(0.09, 0.09)
	c(0.46, 0.69)		c(0.19, 0.59)		c(0.24, 0.69)		c(0.23, 0.27)
	(0.196, 0.205, 0.084)	√	(0.188, 0.189, 0.132)	√	(0.309, 0.353, 0.217)	√	(0.101, 0.160, 0.092)	√
	(0.522, 0.473, 0.231)	×	(0.363, 0.356, 0.236)	×	(0.544, 0.521, 0.361)	×	(0.413, 0.375, 0.090)	×

表1

图4

表2

参考文献 37

1	ZADEH L A . Fuzzy sets[J]. Information & Control, 1965, 8 (3): 338- 353.
2	ATANASSOV K . Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20 (1): 87- 96. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
3	陶希闻, 江文奇. 基于调整成本的三阶段区间直觉模糊型多准则群体共识改进模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (11): 2570- 2580. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.11.20
	TAO X W , JIANG W Q . Three-stage consensus improvement model under interval-valued intuitionistic multi-criteria group decision-making environment based on adjustment cost[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (11): 2570- 2580. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.11.20
4	江文奇, 降晓璐. 面向属性关联的区间犹豫模糊型PROMETHEE决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (11): 3250- 3258. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.25
	JIANG W Q , JIANG X L . Interval hesitant fuzzy PROMETHEE decision method for attribute association[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (11): 3250- 3258. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.25
5	TYCAB C . Pythagorean fuzzy linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference using a squared-distance-based approach for multiple criteria decision analysis[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 164 (7): 113908.
6	SINGH V , KUMAR C . Improving Hamming-distance computation for adaptive similarity search approach[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 2022, 18 (2): 241- 256.
7	HENDIANI S , LEV B , GHAREHBAGHI A . Diagnosing social failures in sustainable supply chains using a modified Pythagorean fuzzy distance to ideal solution[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 154 (8): 107156.
8	ZHANG Z H , XIAO F Y . Complex belief interval-based distance measure with its application in pattern recognition[J]. International Journal of Intelligent, 2022, 37 (1): 6811- 6832.
9	WU Q , LIN W H , ZHOU L G , et al. Enhancing multiple attribute group decision making flexibility based on information fusion technique and hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets[J]. Compu-ters & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 127 (4): 954- 970.
10	ZHOU F , CHEN T Y . An extended Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR method with risk preference and a novel generalized distance measure for multicriteria decision-making problems[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33 (2): 11821- 11844.
11	DUTTA P . A sophisticated similarity measure for picture fuzzy sets and their application[J]. Applied Soft Computing: Techniques and Applications, 2022, 21 (6): 89- 103.
12	VIJAYABALAJI S , RAMESH A , BALAJI P . A new distance and similarity measure on soft parameter sets and their applications to MCDM problem[J]. Fuzzy Mathematical Analysis and Advances in Computational Mathematics, 2022, 419 (7): 127- 136.
13	HENDIANI S , LEV B , GHAREHBAGHI A . Diagnosing social failures in sustainable supply chains using a modified Pythagorean fuzzy distance to ideal solution[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 154 (2): 107156.
14	SHARMA D K , SINGH S , GANIE A H . Distance-based knowledge measure of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set with its application in multi-criteria decision making[J]. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 2022, 11 (1): 139- 158.
15	WANG F , ZHAO X D . Prospect-theory and geometric distance measure-based Pythagorean cubic fuzzy multicriteria decision-making[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021, 36 (8): 4117- 4142. doi: 10.1002/int.22453
16	ZHOU F , CHEN T Y . An extended Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR method with risk preference and a novel generalized distance mea-sure for multicriteria decision-making problems[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33 (18): 11821- 11844. doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-05829-7
17	DENG Z , WANG J Y . New distance measure for Fermatean fuzzy sets and its application[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2022, 37 (3): 1903- 1930. doi: 10.1002/int.22760
18	WANG S , STAVROU P A , SKOGLUND M . Generalizations of talagrand inequality for sinkhorn distance using entropy power inequality[J]. Entropy, 2022, 24 (2): 306- 325. doi: 10.3390/e24020306
19	SARKAR B , BISWAS A . Pythagorean fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS integrated approach for transportation management through a new distance measure[J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25 (5): 4073- 4089. doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-05433-2
20	CHEN S M , CHANG C H . A novel similarity measure between Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on transformation techniques with applications to pattern recognition[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 291 (10): 96- 114.
21	GOHAIN B , CHUTIA R , DUTTA P , et al. Two new similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its various applications[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2022, 37 (9): 5557- 5596. doi: 10.1002/int.22802
22	BORAN F E , AKAY D . A biparametric similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 255 (9): 45- 57.
23	JIANG Q A , JIN X B . A new similarity/distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the transformed isosceles triangles and its applications to pattern recognition[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 116 (6): 439- 453.
24	GARG H , RANI D . Novel distance measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on various triangle centers of isosceles triangular fuzzy numbers and their applications[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 191 (6): 116228.
25	陶希闻, 江文奇. 面向群体共识的三阶段犹豫模糊型信息融合方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (12): 3603- 3613.
	TAO X W , JIANG W Q . Research on three-stage hesitant fuzzy information fusion method for group consensus[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (12): 3603- 3613.
26	YAGER R R , ABBASOV A M . Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2013, 28 (5): 436- 452. doi: 10.1002/int.21584
27	SARKAR B , BISWAS A . Linguistic Einstein aggregation operator-based TOPSIS for multicriteria group decision making in linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy environment[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021, 36 (13): 2825- 2864.
28	BVYVKÖZKAN G , GÖÇER F , UZTVRK D . A novel pythagorean fuzzy set integrated choquet integral approach for vertical farming technology assessment[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 158 (6): 107384.
29	陈六新, 罗南方. 基于前景理论的勾股模糊多属性决策[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40 (3): 726- 735.
	CHEN L X , LUO N F . Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on prospect theory[J]. System Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2020, 40 (3): 726- 735.
30	WAN S P , JIN Z . Pythagorean fuzzy mathematical programming method for multi-attribute group decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy truth degrees[J]. Knowledge & Information Systems, 2018, 55 (2): 437- 466.
31	LI D Q , ZENG W Y . Distance measure of pythagorean fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2018, 33 (2): 348- 361. doi: 10.1002/int.21934
32	ZENG W Y , LI D Q , YIN Q . Distance and similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple criteria group decision making[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2018, 33 (11): 2236- 2254. doi: 10.1002/int.22027
33	ZHOU F , CHEN T Y . Multiple criteria group decision analysis using a Pythagorean fuzzy programming model for multidimensional analysis of preference based on novel distance measures[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 148 (8): 106670.
34	ZHANG X L . Multicriteria pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: a hierarchical qualiflex approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 330 (7): 104- 124.
35	YAGER R R . Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making[J]. IEEE Trans.on Fuzzy System, 2014, 22 (11): 958- 965.
36	WAN S P , JIN Z , DONG J Y . A new order relation for Pythagorean fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2020, 62 (2): 751- 785.
37	VLACHOS I K , SERGIADIS G D . Intuitionistic fuzzy information-application to pattern recognition[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2007, 28 (9): 197- 206.

序号	识别样本	方法	d(P, P₁)	d(P, P₂)	d(P, P₃)	分类结果
1	P₁={(0.33, 0.46), (0.83, 0.51), (0.49, 0.6)} P₂={(0.55, 0.14), (0.57, 0.69), (0.49, 0.25)} P₃={(0.63, 0.17), (0.74, 0.55), (0.67, 0.53)} P={(0.28, 0.92), (0.44, 0.55), (0.22, 0.4)}	文献[30]	0.828	0.676	0.889	P₂
		文献[31]	0.475	0.546	0.625	P₁
		文献[32]	0.543	0.550	0.639	P₁
		文献[33]	0.680	0.927	0.970	P₁
		本文提出方法	0.313	0.326	0.394	P₁
2	P₁={(0.42, 0.29), (0.42, 0.52), (0.12, 0.26)} P₂={(0.14, 0.35), (0.35, 0.27), (0.14, 0.12)} P₃={(0.7, 0.32), (0.23, 0.91), (0.81, 0.5)} P={(0.43, 0.65), (0.25, 0.29), (0.61, 0.62)}	文献[30]	0.687	0.629	0.750	P₂
		文献[31]	0.516	0.502	0.499	P₃
		文献[32]	0.514	0.498	0.505	P₂
		文献[33]	0.599	0.533	0.783	P₂
		本文方法	0.307	0.294	0.315	P₂
3	P₁={(0.71, 0.05), (0.05, 0.85), (0.67, 0.15)} P₂={(0.18, 0.12), (0.49, 0.06), (0.45, 0.51)} P₃={(0.59, 0.41), (0.3, 0.48), (0.94, 0.28)} P={(0.44, 0.43), (0.74, 0.55), (0.18, 0.97)}	文献[30]	0.943	0.374	0.388	P₂
		文献[31]	0.742	0.594	0.598	P₂
		文献[32]	0.722	0.626	0.576	P₃
		文献[33]	1.097	0.810	0.929	P₂
		本文方法	0.476	0.374	0.388	P₂
4	P₁={(0.89, 0.1), (0.74, 0.35), (0.34, 0.13)} P₂={(0.49, 0.5), (0.2, 0.26), (0.56, 0.39)} P₃={(0.14, 0.32), (0.51, 0.69), (0.27, 0.61)} P={(0.72, 0.33), (0.61, 0.58), (0.06, 0.35)}	文献[30]	0.316	0.628	0.532	P₁
		文献[31]	0.418	0.549	0.443	P₁
		文献[32]	0.384	0.528	0.421	P₁
		文献[33]	0.803	0.742	0.602	P₃
		本文方法	0.212	0.314	0.254	P₁

[1]	汪汝根, 李为民, 罗骁, 吕诚中. 基于新距离测度的直觉模糊VIKOR多属性决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(11): 2524-2532.
[2]	弓晓敏, 于长锐. 基于云模型的改进TODIM方案评价方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(7): 1539-1547.
[3]	刘恒，梅卫，单甘霖. 小样本数据的三种区间估计方法性能分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(10): 1929-1933.