敏捷C2组织生成及演进的度量与优化

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.04.17

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1090-1097.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.04.17

• 系统工程 • 上一篇

敏捷C2组织生成及演进的度量与优化

钟赟¹^,², 万路军¹^,*, 姚佩阳³, 张杰勇³

1. 空军工程大学空管领航学院, 陕西西安 710051
2. 空军工程大学装备管理与无人机工程学院, 陕西西安 710051
3. 空军工程大学信息与导航学院, 陕西西安 710077

收稿日期:2021-10-21 出版日期:2023-03-29 发布日期:2023-03-28
通讯作者: 万路军
作者简介:钟赟 (1990—), 男, 工程师, 博士, 主要研究方向为有人-无人机协同作战、指挥与控制组织设计
万路军 (1984—), 男, 副教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为空域管理、指挥与控制系统技术
姚佩阳 (1960—), 男, 教授, 硕士, 主要研究方向为指挥与控制系统技术、作战决策
张杰勇 (1983—), 男, 副教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为指挥与控制组织设计、指挥与控制系统技术

Measurement and optimization of generation and evolution of agile C2 organization

Yun ZHONG¹^,², Lujun WAN¹^,*, Peiyang YAO³, Jieyong ZHANG³

1. Air Traffic Control and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China
2. Equipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China
3. Information and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710077, China

Received:2021-10-21 Online:2023-03-29 Published:2023-03-28
Contact: Lujun WAN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

指挥与控制(command and control, C2)组织敏捷性度量与优化是重要的研究领域。针对当前研究主要集中于组织设计方面导致范畴受限，以及方法本身不够系统全面的问题，提出从C2组织生成及演进角度开展相关研究，从而实现组织敏捷性的高效度量与优化。在对C2组织生成及演进、C2组织设计概念内涵进行辨析的基础上, 分析了分层递阶视角下C2组织生成及演进的具体内容。分别分析了C2组织生成鲁棒性和演进适应性的作用原理、作用过程和具体分类。根据C2组织生成及演进的具体内容, 分别进行生成鲁棒性和演进适应性的度量和优化。

关键词: 指挥与控制组织, 组织设计, 生成及演进, 鲁棒性, 适应性

Abstract:

The agility measurement and optimization of command and control (C2) organization is an important research field. Aiming at the problem that the current research mainly focuses on organization design, resulting in limited scope, and the method itself is not systematic and comprehensive, it is proposed to carry out related research from the perspective of C2 organization generation and evolution, so as to achieve efficient measurement and optimization of organization agility. Based on the analysis of the conceptual connotation of the generation and evolution of C2 organization and C2 organization design, the specific contents of the generation and evolution of C2 organization is analyzed from the hierarchical perspective. The principle, process and specific classification of C2 organization generation robustness and evolution adaptability are analyzed respectively. According to the specific content of C2 organization generation and evolution, the generation robustness and evolution adaptability are measured and optimized respectively.

Key words: command and control (C2) organization, organization design, generation and evolution, robustness, adaptability

中图分类号:

E917

钟赟, 万路军, 姚佩阳, 张杰勇. 敏捷C2组织生成及演进的度量与优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(4): 1090-1097.

Yun ZHONG, Lujun WAN, Peiyang YAO, Jieyong ZHANG. Measurement and optimization of generation and evolution of agile C2 organization[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(4): 1090-1097.

图/表 4

参考文献 32

1	DAFT R L . Organization theory and design[M]. 12th ed Singapore: Cengage Learning Press, 2016.
2	WANG X , YAO P Y , ZHANG J Y , et al. Distributed tasks-platforms scheduling method to Holonic-C2 organization[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (1): 110- 120. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.01.11
3	ALBERTS D S . The agility advantage: a survival guide for complex enterprises and endeavors[M]. Washington DC: Command and Control Research Program Press, 2011.
4	YU F L , TU F , PATTIPATI K R . Integration of a holonic organizational control architecture and multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for flexible distributed scheduling[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2008, 38 (5): 1001- 1017. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2008.923082
5	JENNY M, DAN M, HARVEY R, et al. Modeling C2 agility to meet the demands of a distributed force[C]//Proc. of the International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2013.
6	张维明, 朱承, 黄松平, 等. 指挥与控制原理[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2021.
	ZHANG W M , ZHU C , HUANG S P , et al. Principles of command and control[M]. Beijing: Electronics Industry Press, 2021.
7	杨婷婷. 敏捷C2组织测度研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2013.
	YANG T T. Research on the measures of the agile C2 organization[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2013.
8	XIU B X, LIANG M L, MU L. Robustness analysis of military organization[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2010: 1971-1975.
9	YANG Y, XIU B X, YANG T T, et al. The robustness of agile C2 organization[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Information Science and Electronic Technology, 2015: 24-27.
10	王勋, 贾方超, 张杰勇, 等. 基于多目标优化的Holonic-C2组织协作式资源动态调度方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2021, 36 (6): 1472- 1481. doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2019.1032
19	YANIKOGLU I , GORISSEN B L , HERTOG D D . A survey of adjustable robust optimization[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 277 (3): 799- 813. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.031
20	BERTSIMAS D , BROWN D B , CARAMANIS C . Theory and applications of robust optimization[J]. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review, 2011, 53 (3): 464- 501.
21	WANG X , YAO P Y , ZHANG J Y , et al. Dynamic resource scheduling for C2 organizations based on multi-objective optimization[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 64614- 64626. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2914951
22	KATHRIN K , ELISABETH K , ANITA S , et al. A unified approach to uncertain optimization[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 260 (2): 403- 420. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.045
23	JIANG C , HAN X , LIU G R , et al. A nonlinear interval num ber programming method for uncertain optimization problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 188 (1): 1- 13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.031
24	NATO SAS-085 Research Task Group. Final report on C2 agi-lity[R]. Washington DC: Command and Control Research Program Press, 2014.
25	钟赟, 万路军, 张杰勇. 区间不确定性下的空中作战行动过程优选方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42 (2): 324282.
	ZHONG Y , WAN L J , ZHANG J Y . Optimized selection method for air combat course of action with interval uncertainty[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42 (2): 324282.
26	WAN L J , ZHONG Y , LI W . COA optimized selection method of aviation swarm based on DINs and DABC[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 65116- 65126. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982784
27	HAIDER S , LEVIS A H . Effective course-of-action determination to achieve desired effects[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2007, 37 (6): 1140- 1150. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2007.904771
10	WANG X , JIA F C , ZHANG J Y , et al. Holonic-C2 organization collaborative resource dynamic scheduling method based on multi-objective optimization[J]. Control and Decision, 2021, 36 (6): 1472- 1481. doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2019.1032
11	SUN Y , YAO P Y , SHUI D D , et al. Uncertain optimal model and solving method to platform scheduling problem in battlefield[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 27 (1): 157- 165.
12	YANG C H , LIU J X , CHEN H H , et al. Adaptive optimization of agile organization of command and control resource[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 20 (3): 558- 564.
13	LEVCHUK G M , LEVCHUK Y N , LUO J , et al. Normative design of organizations, Part I: mission planning[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2002, 32 (3): 346- 359. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802819
14	LEVCHUK G M , LEVCHUK Y N , LUO J , et al. Normative design of organizations, Part Ⅱ: organizational structure[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2002, 32 (3): 360- 375. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802820
15	LEVCHUK G M , LEVCHUK Y N , MEIRINA C , et al. Normative design of organizations, Part Ⅲ: modeling congruent, robust, and adaptive organizations[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2004, 34 (3): 337- 350. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2003.822268
16	LUIGI M , MARTINA G , DIEGO C . Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective[J]. Journal of Organization Design, 2021, 10 (1): 3- 18. doi: 10.1186/s41469-021-00090-7
17	ZHOU D , SHENG M , LI B , et al. Distributionally robust planning for data delivery in distributed satellite cluster network[J]. IEEE Trans.on Wireless Communications, 2019, 18 (7): 3642- 3657. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2019.2916663
18	BOLD M , GOERIGK M . A compact reformulation of the two-stage robust resource-constrained project scheduling problem[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2021, 130, 105232. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2021.105232
28	FOX M, GEREVINI A, LONG D, et al. Plan stability: replanning versus plan repair[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 2006: 212-221.
29	SONG B D, KIM J, MORRISON J R. Towards real time scheduling for persistent UAV service: a rolling horizon MILP approach, RHTA and the STAH heuristic[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 2014: 506-515.
30	YUAN P L , HAN W , SU X C , et al. A dynamic scheduling method for carrier aircraft support operation under uncertain conditions based on rolling horizon strategy[J]. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8 (9): 1546. doi: 10.3390/app8091546
31	ZHANG A , TANG Z L , ZHANG C . Man-machine function allocation based on uncertain linguistic multiple attribute decision making[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2011, 24 (6): 816- 822. doi: 10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60096-4
32	王勋, 张杰勇, 万路军, 等. Holonic-C2组织决策分配及演化方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2020, 42 (6): 157- 166.
	WANG X , ZHANG J Y , WAN L J , et al. Holonic-C2 organization decision allocation and evolution method[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2020, 42 (6): 157- 166.

[1]	张天骐, 叶绍鹏, 刘鉴兴, 柏浩钧. 基于彩色图像Tetrolet变换的频数质心零水印算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 41-48.
[2]	杨芷柔, 张虎, 刘静, 刘同林. 节点攻击策略下的军事通信网络结构优化算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1848-1855.
[3]	王哲, 李建华, 康东. 网络信息体系双层异质相依网络模型鲁棒性[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 961-969.
[4]	吕卫民, 李永强. 电子功能部件环境适应性试验优化设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(7): 1630-1636.
[5]	陈星, 李战武, 徐安, 胡晓东. 基于目标机动模式识别的VSMM算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(5): 999-1006.
[6]	王超, 郭基联, 沈安慰. 基于不对称依赖的相依网络级联故障分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(5): 1093-1101.
[7]	徐国明, 袁宏武, 薛模根, 王峰. 全偏振参量低秩稀疏分解伪彩色图像融合[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(11): 2450-2460.
[8]	陈旿, 范铭楷, 李泽宏, 金鑫, 洪亮. 蜂群无人机系统的网络鲁棒性设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(11): 2633-2640.
[9]	王尔申, 王玉伟, 曲萍萍, 蓝晓宇, 陈佳美. 基于代价的复杂网络边攻击策略有效性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(4): 919-926.
[10]	徐秋坪, 王旭刚, 王中原. 滑翔制导炮弹自抗扰姿态解耦控制器设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(2): 384-392.
[11]	司光亚, 王飞, 李聪, 张昱. 基于交互网测量的武器装备体系鲁棒性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(7): 1506-1512.
[12]	杨迎辉, 李建华, 南明莉, 崔琼, 王宏. 网络化作战信息流转策略适应性演化建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(7): 1513-1523.
[13]	张岩, 李建增, 李德良, 杜玉龙. 快速自适应鲁棒性尺度不变的特征检测子[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(6): 1406-1413.
[14]	王竣德, 老松杨, 阮逸润, 侯绿林, 白亮. 基于节点负载容忍度的相依网络鲁棒性研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(11): 2477-2483.
[15]	孙世岩, 朱惠民. PROMETHEE优先函数选择与参数配置方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(1): 120-124.

敏捷C2组织生成及演进的度量与优化

Measurement and optimization of generation and evolution of agile C2 organization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价