反临与反导预警探测特征比较

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.02.07

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 379-385.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.02.07

• 电子技术 • 上一篇

反临与反导预警探测特征比较

郑建成¹^,²^,*, 曲智国¹, 谭贤四¹, 王京阳³, 李陆军⁴

1. 空军预警学院三系, 湖北武汉 430019
2. 中国人民解放军95246部队, 广西南宁 530007
3. 中国人民解放军93110部队, 北京 100843
4. 空军预警学院雷达士官学校, 湖北武汉 430300

收稿日期:2021-12-02 出版日期:2023-01-13 发布日期:2023-02-04
通讯作者: 郑建成
作者简介:郑建成(1986—), 男, 工程师, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为预警监视、装备体系论证
曲智国(1982—), 男, 讲师，博士后, 主要研究方向为预警监视、图像处理
谭贤四(1967—), 男, 教授, 博士，主要研究方向为预警监视, 装备体系论证
王京阳(1980—), 女, 工程师, 博士, 主要研究方向为系统总体论证
李陆军(1986—), 男, 讲师, 博士, 主要研究方向为预警监视与装备体系论证

Comparison of early warning detection characteristics between anti-near-space and anti-missile

Jiancheng ZHENG¹^,²^,*, Zhiguo QU¹, Xiansi TAN¹, Jingyang WANG³, Lujun LI⁴

1. No.3 Department of Air Force Early Warnning Academy, Wuhan 430019, China
2. Unit 95246 of the PLA, Nanning 530007, China
3. Unit 93110 of the PLA, Beijing 100843, China
4. Radar Sergeant School, Air Force Early Warnning Academy, Wuhan 430300, China

Received:2021-12-02 Online:2023-01-13 Published:2023-02-04
Contact: Jiancheng ZHENG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为厘清防御方对来袭临近空间高超声速目标性能的认识, 进而改进现有导弹防御策略, 对此类目标与弹道导弹之间的预警探测特征进行比较分析。通过建立颗粒度适中的目标运动模型、红外探测模型和雷达探测模型, 采用同等仿真条件，详细、定量对比分析两类目标飞行高度和横向机动能力对地基预警体系的影响及红外辐射可探测性性能。比较分析结果表明, 纵向射程相同时，高超声速目标更低的飞行高度和更强的机动能力导致雷达对目标搜索捕获难度更大, 但其红外辐射强度大使得对目标稳定预警探测的时间更长。

关键词: 防御方, 高超声速目标, 弹道导弹, 性能模型, 搜索捕获, 预警时间

Abstract:

In order to clarify a defensive party's understanding of the performance of incoming near space hypersonic target and improve the existing missile defense strategy, the early warning detection characteristics between hypersonic target and ballistic missile are compared and analyzed. By establishing a target motion model, a infrared detection model, and a radar detection model with moderate particle size, the influence of the flying altitude and lateral maneuverability of the two kinds of targets on the ground-based early warning system and the detectability of infrared radiation are analyzed in detail and quantitatively under the same simulation conditions. Analysis results show that under the same downrange, lower flying height and stronger maneuverability of the hypersonic target make it more difficult for the radar to search and capture, but the target's strong infrared radiation intensity makes the stable early warning detection time for the target longer.

Key words: defensive party, hypersonic target, ballistic missile, performance model, search capture, early warning time

中图分类号:

TP761.9

郑建成, 曲智国, 谭贤四, 王京阳, 李陆军. 反临与反导预警探测特征比较[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(2): 379-385.

Jiancheng ZHENG, Zhiguo QU, Xiansi TAN, Jingyang WANG, Lujun LI. Comparison of early warning detection characteristics between anti-near-space and anti-missile[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(2): 379-385.

图/表 9

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

表3

图4

表4

表5

参考文献 26

1	KELLEY M S. Hypersonic weapons: background and issues for congress[R]. Washington D. C. : Congressional Research Ser-vice, 2021: 2.
2	JAMES M A . Hypersonic boost-glide weapons[J]. Science & Global Security, 2015, 23, 191- 219.
3	ROBERT J F. Space-based laser countermeasure for hypersonic glide vehicle[D]. Norfolk: Old Dominion University, 2020.
4	DOUGLAS F. Hypersonic glide vehicles: implications for strategic stability in the coming hypersonic era[D]. Ottawa: Carleton University, 2019.
5	赵良玉, 雍恩米, 王波兰. 反临近空间高超声速飞行器若干研究进展[J]. 宇航学报, 2020, 41 (10): 1239- 1250. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2020.10.001
	ZHAO L Y , YONG E M , WANG B L . Some achievements on interception of near space hypersonic vehicles[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2020, 41 (10): 1239- 1250. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2020.10.001
6	STEPHEN R . Nuclear-armed hypersonic weapons and nuclear deterrence[J]. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 2020, 14 (4): 47- 73.
7	孙涛, 郭彦江. 美国下一代反导体系架构解析[J]. 军事文摘, 2021, (11): 61- 64.
	SUN T , GUO Y J . Analysis of American next generation anti-missile architecture[J]. Military Digest, 2021, (11): 61- 64.
8	RICHARD C R . The interagency challenges of hypersonic strike weapons[J]. Inter Agency Journal, 2019, 10 (2): 17- 29.
9	TRACY C L , WRIGHT D . Modeling the performance of hypersonic boost-glide missiles[J]. Science & Global Security, 2020, 28 (3): 135- 170.
10	吴楠, 王锋, 赵敏, 等. 高超声速滑翔再入飞行器的可达区快速预测[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2021, 43 (1): 1- 6.
	WU N , WANG F , ZHAO M , et al. Fast prediction for footprint of hypersonic glide reentry vehicle[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2021, 43 (1): 1- 6.
11	何苹, 王莹莹, 樊雷, 等. 红外探测器对高超声速飞行器的作用距离分析[J]. 激光与红外, 2020, 50 (6): 692- 690.
	HE P , WANG Y Y , FAN L , et al. Operation range analysis of the infrared detector for hypersonic flight vehicles[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2020, 50 (6): 692- 690.
12	陈海龙, 张翱, 刘雪梅, 等. 低轨红外卫星对类HTV-2高超飞行器探测能力研究[J]. 光学学报, 2021, 41 (21): 50- 57.
	CHEN H L , ZHANG A , LIU X M , et al. Research on detection capability of low-orbit infrared satellite to HTV-2-like hypersonic vehicle[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41 (21): 50- 57.
13	杨虹, 张雅声, 丁文哲. 飞艇红外探测系统探测高超声速目标性能研究[J]. 中国光学, 2016, 9 (5): 596- 605.
	YANG H , ZHANG Y S , DING W Z . Detectability of airship infrared detection system to hypersonic vehicle[J]. Chinese Optics, 2016, 9 (5): 596- 605.
14	冯耀, 王红, 曲智国, 等. 平流层飞艇载雷达跟踪HGT性能分析[J]. 航空兵器, 2020, 27 (5): 45- 50.
	FENG Y , WANG H , QU Z G , et al. Performance analysis of stratospheric airship-borne radar tracking HGT[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2020, 27 (5): 45- 50.
15	肖松, 谭贤四, 王红, 等. 地基雷达部署对探测临近空间高超声速目标影响研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37 (7): 1723- 1728.
	XIAO S , TAN X S , WANG H , et al. Detection performance assessment of near-space hypersonic target based on ground-based radar[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Techno-logy, 2015, 37 (7): 1723- 1728.
16	GRONLUND L , WRIGHT D . Depressed-trajectory SLBMs: a technical assessment and arms control possibilities[J]. Science & Global Security, 1992, 3 (1/2): 101- 159.
17	FRANK J R . Re-entry vehicle dynamics[M]. New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1984.
18	王少平, 董受全, 刘亿, 等. 助推滑翔高超声速导弹红外辐射特性研究[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2020, (5): 27- 32.
	WANG S P , DONG S Q , LIU Y , et al. Research on infrared characteristics of boost-glide hypersonic missile[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2020, (5): 27- 32.
19	周琳, 刁伟峰. 一种基于资源约束的远程预警雷达模型[J]. 现代雷达, 2019, 41 (12): 8- 11.8-11, 16
	ZHOU L , DIAO W F . A long range early waring radar model based on resource constraints[J]. Modern Radar, 2019, 41 (12): 8- 11.8-11, 16
20	赵会朋, 冯占林, 李博骁, 等. 防空反导预警装备覆盖能力推演分析[J]. 兵工自动化, 2020, 39 (8): 16- 21.16-21, 36
	ZHAO H P , FENG Z L , LI B X , et al. Coverage ability deduction analysis of air defense and anti-missile early warning equipment[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2020, 39 (8): 16- 21.16-21, 36
21	汪立萍, 赵霜, 蒋长菊, 等. 国外高超声速武器发展动态[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2020, 36 (5): 61- 64.
	WANG L P , ZHAO S , JIANG C J , et al. Developments of hypersonic weapon abroad[J]. Aerospace Electronic Warfare, 2020, 36 (5): 61- 64.
22	武文峰, 靳凌, 周桃品. 临近空间高超声速目标防御制导策略研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2020, 31 (3): 68- 72.
	WU W F , JIN L , ZHOU T P . Research on defense and gui-dance strategy of hypersonic target in near-space[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2020, 31 (3): 68- 72.
23	朱姣. 导弹目标多波段红外成像特征建模仿真分析[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2017.
	ZHU J. Analysis and simulation on multi-band infrared imaging feature of missile target[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2017.
24	NATHAN S. Exclusive: how the Space Force foiled an Iranian missile attack with a critical early warning[EB/OL]. [2021-11-7]. https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/space/2021/01/07/exclusive-how-the-space-force-foiled-an-iranian-missile-attack-with-a-critical-early-warning/.
25	张凯莉. 红外预警卫星对弹道中段目标探测能力研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2018.
	ZHANG K L. Research on detection ability of infrared early warning satellite for target in ballistic midcourse[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2018.
26	KARL H K. Generic case study: evaluation of early warning satellites cueing radars against TBM[C]//Proc. of the SPIE Conference on Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets, 1999, 3809(1): 297-307.

目标类型	巡航高度/km	飞行速度/Ma	射程/km	机动能力	辐射温度/K
HGV	30~60	10~27	1 000~12 000	纵向跳跃滑翔+横向大范围机动	1 000~2 000
BM	100~1 400	＜22	＜14 000	纵向有限机动	~300

目标类别	HGV	BM
探测背景	大气、地面背景	深空冷背景
红外探测波段	短波	长波
平均辐射温度/K	1 325	285
平均辐射强度/(kW/sr)	187.5	0.106
探测距离/km	5 250	8 482
预警时间/s	1 465	1 278

目标类别	HGV	BM
发现距离/km	723.7	4 670
目标速度/Ma	6.8	14.9
目标高度/km	31.4	1 285
可预警时间/s	681	962

总射程	开始机动时的纵程
总射程	0	2 000	4 000	6 000	8 000	不机动
总横程	1 803	1 541	1 301	1 069	703	0
总纵程	10 797	10 876	10 948	11 017	11 127	11 305

目标类别	HGV	BM
穿屏时间/s	8.2	24.2
搜索波位数	60	7
帧周期/s	4.8	0.6
照射次数	1	40

反临与反导预警探测特征比较

Comparison of early warning detection characteristics between anti-near-space and anti-missile

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 26

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吉瑞萍, 张程祎, 梁彦, 王跃东. 基于LSTM的弹道导弹主动段轨迹预报[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 1968-1976.
[2]	向前, 王晓丹, 李睿, 来杰, 张国令. 基于DCNN的弹道中段目标HRRP图像识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(11): 2426-2433.
[3]	牛立强, 谢拥军, 张春刚, 武东伟. 对抗环境下宙斯盾系统探测弹道导弹的仿真[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(6): 1195-1201.
[4]	潘媚媚, 曹运合, 王宇, 吴文华. 基于机动判别的变结构交互多模型跟踪算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(4): 730-736.
[5]	杜广洋, 郑学合. 雷达群目标跟踪条件下的弹道预报方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(12): 2683-2688.
[6]	周觐, 雷虎民. 真比例导引反高速目标拦截能力分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(10): 2296-2304.
[7]	范阳涛, 汪民乐, 朱亚红, 夏维. 基于分解协调法的弹道导弹突防效能控制优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(7): 1577-1582.
[8]	王伟林, 陈磊, 雷勇军. 弹道导弹中段诱饵微动特性研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(3): 487-492.
[9]	孙永健1,2，穆贺强1，程臻3，王桂玲1，付莹2. 中段弹道目标宽带回波仿真与速度补偿[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(7): 1255-1262.
[10]	庞礴，代大海，王雪松，李永祯. 基于多维极化信息的弹道目标综合识别方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(4): 677-683.
[11]	齐照辉, 刘雪梅, 梁伟 . 基于MCMC的导弹主动段突防仿真及灵敏度分析[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(4): 803-806.
[12]	俞建国, 刘梅，武云丽，高寒松. 基于非对称交互多模型弹道导弹跟踪[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(12): 2570-2575.
[13]	姜卫东. 弹道目标电磁特征提取技术的研究进展[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(10): 2091-2097.