基于知识图谱的战略智能体BDI模型

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.01.15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前国际形势复杂多变, 战略态势越来越紧张, 把握对手战略目标对维护领土和主权完整具有重要意义。以对手国防建设项目作为手段, 研究对手的战略目标, 为战略目标与建设项目预实践研究提供了一种新思路。首先提出战略智能体信念-愿望-意图(belief-desire-intention，BDI)模型框架, 为分析战略目标与国防建设项目提供统一的逻辑框架, 并基于本领域的不确定知识图谱推理, 实现战略智能体BDI模型, 最终得到相对完善的国防建设项目-战略图谱, 对新时期制定对等的军事战略方针具有重要指导和参考价值。

关键词: 知识图谱, 战略智能体, 国防建设项目, 预实践

Abstract:

The current international situation is complex and changeable, and strategic situation is becoming more and more severe. Grasping the strategic objectives of opponents is of great significance to safeguarding territorial and sovereign integrity. This article uses the opponent's defense construction project as a means to study the opponent's strategic goals, and provides a new way of thinking for the strategic goals and construction project pre-practical research. Firstly, the strategic agent belief-desire-intention (BDI) model framework for strategic agents is proposed to analyze strategies objectives and national defense construction projects in a unified logical framework. Based on the uncertain knowledge graph reasoning in this field to realize the strategic agent BDI model, a relatively complete defense construction project-strategic knowledge graph is obtained finally, which is important to formulate equivalent military strategic guidelines in the new era.

Key words: knowledge graph, strategic agent, national defense construction project, pre-practice

中图分类号:

TP391

李童心, 王维平, 王涛, 李小波. 基于知识图谱的战略智能体BDI模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 119-126.

Tongxin LI, Weiping WANG, Tao WANG, Xiaobo LI. Strategic agent BDI model based on knowledge graph[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 119-126.

图/表 4

参考文献 43

1	蔡祖铭. 北京: 美国军事战略研究[M]. 北京: 军事科学出版社, 1993.
	CAI Z M . Research on American military strategy[M]. Beijing: Military Science Press, 1993.
2	潘星, 张国忠, 张跃东, 等. 工程弹性系统与系统弹性理论研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (9): 2006- 2015.
	PAN X , ZHANG G Z , ZHANG Y D , et al. Review of engineered resilient systems and system resilience theory[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (9): 2006- 2015.
3	BRATMAN M . Intention, plans, and practical reason[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
4	高新民. "BDI模型"与人工智能建模的心灵哲学[J]. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 48 (5): 99- 111.
	GAO X M . "BDI model" and the philosophical thinking of artificial intelligence modeling[J]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 48 (5): 99- 111.
5	VDOGA B , ARP B , RHB B , et al. Reasoning in BDI agents using Toulmin's argumentation model[J]. Theoretical Computer Science, 2020, 805, 76- 91. doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2019.10.026
6	LOWE D. A service-based approach to force design, integration and analysis[C]//Proc. of the INCOSE International Symposium, 2017, 27(1): 1506-1519.
7	漆桂林, 高桓, 吴天星. 知识图谱研究进展[J]. 情报工程, 2017, 3 (1): 4- 25.
	QI G L , GAO H , WU T X . The research advances of knowledge graph[J]. Technology Intelligence Engineering, 2017, 3 (1): 4- 25.
8	LIU W J, ZHOU P, ZHAO Z, et al. K-BERT: enabling language representation with knowledge graph[C]//Proc. of the AAAI Confernce on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 2901-2908.
9	ZHANG S, TAY Y, YAO L, et al. Quaternion knowledge graph embeddings[C]//Proc. of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019: 2735- 2745.
10	JIANG T W, ZHAO T, QIN B, et al. The role of "condition" a novel scientific knowledge graph representation and construction model[C]//Proc. of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2019: 1634-1642.
11	李涓子, 赵军, 陈华钧, 等. 知识图谱发展报告[R]. 北京: 中国中文信息学会语言与知识计算专委会, 2018: 1-11.
	LI J Z, ZHAO J, CHEN H J, et al. Knowledge graph development report[R]. Beijing: Special Committee on Language and Knowledge Computing of Chinese Information Society of China, 2018: 1-11.
12	WU X D, WU J, FU X Y, et al. Automatic knowledge graph construction: a report on the 2019 ICDM/ICBK contest[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2019: 1540-1545.
13	WANG Y Q, MA F L, GAO J. Efficient knowledge graph validation via cross-graph representation learning[C]//Proc. of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Know-ledge Management, 2020: 1595-1604.
14	WEI Z P, SU J L, WANG Y, et al. A novel hierarchical binary tagging framework for joint extraction of entities and relations[EB/OL]. [2021-01-03]. arxiv. org/pdf/1909.03227v1.
15	LIN J J , ZHAO Y Z , HUANG W Y , et al. Domain knowledge graph-based research progress of knowledge representation[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 33 (2): 681- 690.
16	LI F L, CHEN H, XU G, et al. AliMeKG: domain knowledge graph construction and application in e-commerce[C]//Proc. of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2020: 2581-2588.
17	ZHAO H X , PAN Y L , YANG F . Research on information extraction of technical documents and construction of domain knowledge graph[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 168087- 168098. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024070
18	QI P , SUN Y , LUO H , et al. Scratch-DKG: a framework for constructing scratch domain knowledge graph[J]. IEEE Trans.on Emerging Topics in Computing, 2022, 10 (1): 110- 185.
19	DOU J H , QIN J Y , JIN Z X , et al. Knowledge graph based on domain ontology and natural language processing technology for Chinese intangible cultural heritage[J]. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 2018, 48, 19- 28.
20	徐增林, 盛泳潘, 贺丽荣, 等. 知识图谱技术综述[J]. 电子科技大学报, 2016, 45 (4): 589- 606.
	XU Z L , SHENG Y P , HE L R , et al. Review on knowledge graph techniques[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2016, 45 (4): 589- 606.
21	CHEN X J , JIA S B , XIANG Y . A review: knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 141, 112948.
22	PAULHEIM H . Knowledge graph refinement: a survey of ap proaches and evaluation methods[J]. Semantic Web, 2017, 8 (3): 489- 508.
23	LIN Y K, LIU Z Y, SUN M S, et al. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proc. of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015: 2181- 2187.
24	JI G L, HE S Z, XU L H, et al. Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix[C]//Proc. of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2015: 687-696.
25	XIAO H, HUANG M L, ZHU X. TransG: a generative model for knowledge graph embedding[C]//Proc. of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016: 2316-2325.
26	SUN Z Q, DENG Z H, NIE J Y, et al. RotatE: knowledge graph embedding by relational rotation in complex space[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
27	KAZEMI S M, POOLE D. SimplE embedding for link prediction in knowledge graphs[C]//Proc. of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018: 4289-4300.
28	BALAZEVIC I, ALLEN C, HOSPEDALES T. TuckER: tensor factorization for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proc. of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 2019: 5188-5197.
29	DETTMERS T, MINERVINI P, STENETORP P, et al. Convolutional 2D knowledge graph embeddings[C]//Proc. of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018: 1811-1818.
30	NGUYEN T D, NGUYEN D Q, PHUNG D. A novel embedding model for knowledge base completion based on convolutional neural network[C]//Proc. of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2018: 327-333.
31	BALAŽEVI C ' I, ALLEN C, HOSPEDALES T M. Hypernetwork knowledge graph embeddings[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 2019: 553- 565.
32	SHANG C, TANG Y, HUANG J, et al. End-to-end structure-aware convolutional networks for knowledge base completion[C]//Proc. of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019: 3060-3067.
33	NATHANI D, CHAUHAN J, SHARMA C, et al. Learning attention-based embeddings for relation prediction in knowledge graphs[C]//Proc. of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 4710-4723.
34	CAI L, WANG W Y. KBGAN: adversarial learning for know-ledge graph embeddings[C]//Proc. of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2018: 1470-1480.
35	XIAO H, HUANG M L, MENG L, et al. SSP: semantic space projection for knowledge graph embedding with text descriptions[C]//Proc. of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017: 3104-3110.
36	ZHANG Z, ZHUANG F Z, QU M, et al. Knowledge graph embedding with hierarchical relation structure[C]//Proc. of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2018: 3198-3207.
37	XIE R B, LIU Z Y, LUAN H B, et al. Image-embodied knowledge representation learning[C]//Proc. of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017: 3140- 3146.
38	CHEN X L, CHEN M H, SHI W J, et al. Embedding uncertain knowledge graphs[C]//Proc. of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019: 3363-3370.
39	BORDES A, USUNIER N, GARCIA D A, et al. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data[C]//Proc. of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2013: 2787-2795.
40	YANG B S, YI W T, HE X D, et al. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases[J]. [EB/OL]. [2021-01-03]. arxiv. org/abs/1412.6575.
41	NGUYEN H L , VU D T , JUNG J J . Knowledge graph fusion for smart systems: a survey[J]. Information Fusion, 2020, 61, 56- 70.
42	WANG J, LAN Y X, ZHANG S S, et al. Knowledge graph for multi-source data fusion topics research[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on High Performance Big Data and Intelligent Systems, 2020. DOI: 10.11.9/HPBDIS49115.2020.9130586.
43	WANG Y, RUFFINELLI D, GEMULLA R, et al. On Evaluating embedding models for knowledge base completion[C]//Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP-2019), 2019: 104-112.