基于RIMER方法的体系能力需求推荐方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.12.16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着现代作战样式和军事信息系统的深度复杂化, 军事需求工程的任务也逐渐加重。当下, 能力需求是军事需求建设的一个重要着眼点。本文聚焦能力需求的构建阶段, 运用规范化需求描述、基于置信规则库的证据推理(belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning, RIMER)等方法对基于能力的体系需求推荐方法展开了研究。之后, 以工兵的作战任务想定为背景, 展开了案例研究, 完成了对于该想定下工兵能力需求的推荐并验证了所提出能力需求推荐方法的可行性和合理性。并将需求推荐带入了军事需求场景, 获得了一种应用于军事复杂系统需求生成的新方法, 加速了能力需求的生成。

关键词: 能力需求, 需求推荐, 证据推理, 需求描述

Abstract:

As modern combat styles and military information systems have become more complicated, the tasks of military requirements engineering have gradually increased. At present, capability requirements are an important focus of military requirements construction. This paper focuses on the construction phase of capability requirements, uses standardized requirements description, belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning (RIMER) and other methods to carry out research on capability-based system requirements recommendation methods. After that, with the background of the engineer's combat mission scenario, a case study is launched, the recommendation of the engineer's capability requirements for the scenario is completed and the feasibility and rationality of the proposed method of capability requirement recommendation is verified. And, the requirement recommendation is brought into the military requirement scenario, a new method applied to the requirement generation of military complex system is obtained, which accelerates the generation of capability requirement.

Key words: capability requirements, requirements recommendation, evidential reasoning, requirement description

中图分类号:

E917

钱立炜, 徐向前, 豆亚杰, 谭跃进. 基于RIMER方法的体系能力需求推荐方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3719-3727.

Liwei QIAN, Xiangqian XU, Yajie DOU, Yuejin TAN. System capability requirements recommendation method based on RIMER method[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3719-3727.

图/表 12

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

参考文献 32

1	孙家广, 刘强. 软件工程—理论、方法与实践[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005.
	SUN J G , LIU Q . Software engineering—theory, method and practice[M]. Beijing: Press of Advanced Education, 2005.
2	GROVES R M . Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys[J]. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2006, 70 (5): 646- 675. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfl033
3	BERRY D M. The requirements engineering reference model: a fundamental impediment to using formal methods in software systems development[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops, 2019.
4	ZHANG J Y, ZHANG X A, LI H M. Requirements enginee-ring method applied in the civil aircraft airframe segment development[C]// Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Automation Science, 2020: 281-286.
5	ELSHANDIDY H. Behaviour-driven requirements engineering for agile product line engineering[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2019: 434-439.
6	UDDAGIRI V, ESWARACHARY L, JAGADEESAN M, et al. Improving the quality of requirements in middleware requirements specifications[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 28th International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2020: 412-415.
7	MAALEJ W, NAYEBI M, RUHE G. Data-driven requirements engineering-an update[C]//Proc. of the IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, 2019: 289-290.
8	PANIS M C. An analysis of requirements-related problems that occurred in an organization using a mature requirements engineering process[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 28th International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2020: 291-299.
9	舒宇, 谭跃进. 基于能力需求的武器装备体系结构描述方法研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2009, 23 (3): 51- 55.
	SHU Y , TAN Y J . Study on an architecture description method of weapon system of systems based on capability requirement[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2009, 23 (3): 51- 55.
10	ZHU W X , WANG Z X , HOU G L , et al. Capability-based context ontology modeling and reasoning for C₄ISR communication[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 27 (4): 845- 857. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2016.04.13
11	CAO J , MA M D , FU Y L , et al. CPPHA: capability-based privacy-protection handover authentication mechanism for SDN-based 5G HetNets[J]. IEEE Trans.on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2021, 18 (3): 1182- 1195.
12	HODICKY J , PROCHAZKA D , BAXA F . Computer assisted wargame for military capability-based planning[J]. Entropy, 2020, 22 (8): 861. doi: 10.3390/e22080861
13	夏博远, 赵青松, 张骁雄, 等. 基于动态能力需求的鲁棒性武器系统组合决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (6): 1280- 1286.
	XIA B Y , ZHAO Q S , ZHANG X X , et al. Robust weapon system portfolio decision based on dynamic capability requirements[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (6): 1280- 1286.
14	EKPO S C . Parametric system engineering analysis of capability-based small satellite missions[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13 (3): 3546- 3555. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2919526
15	LLANSO T, MCNEIL M, NOTEBOOM C. Multi-criteria selection of capability-based cybersecurity solutions[C]//Proc. of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019: 7322-7330.
16	YU L, FENG Y B, CAO F, et al. A study on the evaluation of emergency management capability based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in mining coal[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science, 2020: 724-728.
17	高阳团. 推荐系统开发实战[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2019.
	GAO Y T . Recommended system development combat[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2019.
18	SHAFER G . A mathematical theory of evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.
19	YAGER R R . On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules[J]. Information System, 1989, 41 (2): 93- 137.
20	INAGKI T . Interdependence between safety-control policy and multip-sensor schemes via Dempster-Shafer theory[J]. IEEE Trans.on Reliability, 1991, 40 (2): 182- 188. doi: 10.1109/24.87125
21	YANG J B , LIU J , WANG J , et al. Belief rule-based inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach-RIMER[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2006, 36 (2): 266- 285. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2005.851270
22	DEMPSTER A P . Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2008: 57- 72.
23	DEMPSTER . A generalization of Bayesian inference[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1968, 30 (2): 205- 232.
24	ZHANG H Q , LI X Y , DENG X Y , et al. A novel method of evidential network reasoning based on the logical reasoning rules and conflict measure[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 78015- 78028.
25	LIAO H, FANG R, YANG J B, et al. Evidential reasoning with linguistic belief structures[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2019.
26	YU Z Y, NIU Z W, CHEN X, et al. A novel fuzzy evidential reasoning method combining entropy weight for power grid emergency capability evaluation with uncertainty[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia, 2019: 1143-1148.
27	DUNHAM J, JOHNSON E, FERON E, et al. Unmanned systems health analysis through evidential reasoning networks[C]// Proc. of the AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Confe-rence, 2020.
28	LIU J D, ZHOU C, HUANG J. Techniques for aerial target recognition based onbelief rule base and evidential reasoning[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Human-Computer Interaction, 2020: 304-309.
29	HE W , YU C Q , ZHOU G H , et al. Fault prediction method for wireless sensor network based on evidential reasoning and belief-rule-base[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 78930- 78941. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2922677
30	PAI S P , PRABHU G R S . Lecture notes in mechanical engineering[M]. Singapore: Springer, 2021.
31	徐刚, 连长春, 熊志君. 工程兵及工程装备发展思考[J]. 工兵装备研究, 2020, 39 (4): 6- 9.
	XU G , LIAN C C , XIONG Z J . Thoughts on development of engineers and engineering equipment[J]. Engineer Equipment Research, 2020, 39 (4): 6- 9.
32	倪晓陆, 吴桑, 骆陈, 等. 工程兵数据建设问题及对策分析[J]. 工兵装备研究, 2020, 39 (3): 5- 9.
	NI X L , WU S , LUO C . Problems and countermeasures of data construction of engineering corps[J]. Engineer Equipment Research, 2020, 39 (3): 5- 9.

衡量尺度编号	衡量尺度说明	标准	信度
M₀₁	执行空降任务高度	中	1
M₀₂	空降任务完成时间/h	0.5	1
M₀₃	空降过程人员装备损失率/%	＜10	1
M₀₄	部队完成集结时间/h	＜1	1
M₀₅	完成集结兵力百分比/%	≥70	1

衡量尺度编号	衡量尺度说明	标准	信度
M₁₁	侦察距离/m	1 200	1
M₁₂	侦察完成时间/h	2	1
M₁₃	人员装备损失率/%	＜10	1
M₁₄	侦察目标比例/%	＞90	1
M₁₅	侦察范围/km²	2.5	1

衡量尺度编号	衡量尺度说明	标准	信度
M₂₁	清扫雷场时间/h	0.5	1
M₂₂	开辟通路条数	18	1
M₂₃	架设桥梁个数	4	1
M₂₄	通路障碍物摧毁率/%	＞90	1
M₂₅	火力点压制率/%	＞60	1
M₂₆	人员装备损失率/%	＜30	1

衡量尺度编号	衡量尺度说明	标准	信度
M₃₁	雷场布置个数	＞8	1
M₃₂	雷场布置时间/h	0.25	1
M₃₃	雷场布置规格	小	1
M₃₄	有效火力反击距离/m	400	1
M₃₅	对敌迟滞率/%	＞70	1

衡量尺度编号	衡量尺度说明	标准取值
M₁₁	侦察距离/m	(500, 1 000, 1 500)
M₁₂	侦察完成时间/h	(1, 1.5, 2)
M₁₃	人员装备损失率/%	(10, 20, 30)
M₁₄	侦察目标比例/%	(80, 90, 100)
M₁₅	侦察范围/h	(1, 2, 3)
		