捷变频雷达联合脉内频率编码抗间歇采样干扰

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.11.11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

间歇采样转发干扰通过对雷达信号进行部分采样并迅速转发, 在当前脉冲重复周期内, 产生相干假目标串, 使得基于传统频率捷变雷达的目标检测面临严峻挑战。因此, 在频率捷变技术基础上提出一种捷变频雷达联合脉内频率编码的抗间歇采样干扰方法。针对间歇采样干扰时域不连续的特点, 通过脉内频率编码-脉间频率捷变实现子脉冲间的相互掩护。脉冲压缩后, 首先利用最大类间方差法(Otsu)自适应计算阈值并抑制干扰, 然后通过二维稀疏重构方法实现目标检测。理论分析和仿真实验证明所提方法可以有效对抗间歇采样干扰。

关键词: 间歇采样干扰, 频率捷变技术, 脉内频率编码, 最大类间方差法, 二维稀疏重构

Abstract:

Intermittent sampling repeater jamming can produce coherent false targets in the current pulse repetition period by partially sampling and rapidly forwarding the radar signal, making the target detection based on traditional frequency agile radar face severe challenges. Therefore, an anti-intermittent sampling jamming method based on frequency agility radar and intra-pulse frequency coding is proposed. Aiming at the time-domain discontinuity of intermittent sampling jamming, the inter-pulse frequency agility and intra-pulse frequency coding are used to realize the mutual protection between sub-pulses. After pulse compression, Otsu is used to adaptively calculate the threshold and suppress the jamming firstly. And then the detection of targets is realized by the two-dimensional sparse reconstruction method. Theoretical analysis and simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively resist intermittent sampling jamming.

Key words: intermittent sampling jamming, frequency agility technique, intra-pulse frequency coding, Otsu, 2-D sparse reconstruction

中图分类号:

TN972

董淑仙, 全英汇, 沙明辉, 方文, 邢孟道. 捷变频雷达联合脉内频率编码抗间歇采样干扰[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3371-3379.

Shuxian DONG, Yinghui QUAN, Minghui SHA, Wen FANG, Mengdao XING. Frequency agile radar combined with intra-pulse frequency coding to resist intermittent sampling jamming[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3371-3379.

图/表 18

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

参考文献 33

1	周超, 刘泉华, 曾涛. DRFM间歇采样转发式干扰辨识算法研究[J]. 信号处理, 2017, (7): 911- 917.
	ZHOU C , LIU Q H , ZENG T . Research on DRFM repeater jamming recognition[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2017, (7): 911- 917.
2	GUAN Z Y , CHEN Y J , LEI P , et al. Application of hash function on FMCW based millimeter-wave radar against DRFM jamming[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 92285- 92295. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928000
3	冉宏远, 张宏伟, 张民国. 数字射频存储器发展现状及趋势[J]. 飞航导弹, 2018, (6): 44- 48.
	RAN H Y , ZHANG H W , ZHANG M G . Development status and trend of digital radio frequency memory[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2018, (6): 44- 48.
4	ZHANG S Y , ZHOU Y , ZHANG L R , et al. Target detection for multistatic radar in the presence of deception jamming[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2021, 21 (6): 8130- 8141. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3050008
5	ZHAO S S , LIU Z W . Deception parameter estimation and discrimination in distributed multiple-radar architectures[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2017, 17 (19): 6322- 6330. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2017.2737654
6	REN Z F , JIANG M , ZHANG L . Orthogonal phase-frequency coded signal in a pulse against interrupted sampling repeater jamming[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 2019 (21): 7573- 7576. doi: 10.1049/joe.2019.0500
7	LI Y T, JIA X, CHEN Y G, et al. Frequency agility MIMO-SAR imaging and anti-deception jamming performance[C]// Proc. of the 31th URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, 2014.
8	LIU K Q , FU X J , LIU J , et al. Angle inversion based on anti-jamming against deceptive multiple false targets[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 2019 (20): 7185- 7189. doi: 10.1049/joe.2019.0488
9	HUANG D T , CUI G L , GE M M , et al. A suppression method against range deception jamming based on homologous localisation test[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 2019 (20): 6961- 6965. doi: 10.1049/joe.2019.0474
10	ZHANG M , ZHANG X T , SONG W J , et al. Mixed jamming suppression algorithm for phased array radar[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 2019 (20): 7179- 7184. doi: 10.1049/joe.2019.0615
11	熊辉. 极化抗有源干扰方法[J]. 电子信息对抗技术, 2020, 35 (5): 57- 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2230.2020.05.014
	XIONG H . Anti-active interference method using polarization[J]. Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 2020, 35 (5): 57- 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2230.2020.05.014
12	卢云龙, 李明, 陈洪猛, 等. 基于熵特征的DRFM有源欺骗干扰CFAR检测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38 (4): 732- 738.
	LU Y L , LI M , CHEN H M , et al. CFAR detection of DRFM deception jamming based on entropyfeature[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (4): 732- 738.
13	ZHAO S S , LIU N , ZHANG L R , et al. Discrimination of deception targets in multistatic radar based on clustering analysis[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2016, 16 (8): 2500- 2508. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2516000
14	LIU K Q, FU X J, GAO Z M, et al. Time-space two-dimensional dense false targets jamming and countermeasures[C]// Proc. of the IEEE 13th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, 2018: 1982-1987.
15	GONG S X , WEI X Z , LI X . ECCM scheme against interrupted sampling repeater jammer based on time-frequency analysis[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36 (6): 90- 97.
16	张亮, 王国宏, 杨志国, 等. 利用回波时频相关差异的雷达欺骗干扰识别方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2021, 55 (2): 136- 142.
	ZHANG L , WANG G H , YANG Z G , et al. Radar deception jamming identification methods using time-frequency correlation difference of echo[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2021, 55 (2): 136- 142.
17	QUAN Y H , WU Y J , LI Y C , et al. Range-Doppler reconstruction for frequency agile and PRF-jittering radar[J]. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2018, 12 (3): 348- 352. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0421
18	杨红岩, 刘振, 魏玺章. 基于信号调频率极性捷变和脉间捷变频的SAR抗干扰成像方法[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2015, (11): 118- 120.
	YANG H Y , LIU Z , WEI X Z . SAR anti-jamming imaging method based on frequency-modulated polarity agility and inter-pulse agility[J]. Digital Technology and Application, 2015, (11): 118- 120.
19	全英汇, 陈侠达, 阮锋, 等. 一种捷变频联合Hough变换的抗密集假目标干扰算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41 (11): 2639- 2645. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190010
	QUAN Y H , CHEN X D , RUAN F , et al. An anti-dense false target jamming algorithm based on agile frequency joint Hough transform[J]. Journal of Electronics and Information Techno-logy, 2019, 41 (11): 2639- 2645. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190010
20	董淑仙, 全英汇, 陈侠达, 等. 基于捷变频联合数学形态学的干扰抑制算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (7): 1491- 1498.
	DONG S X , QUAN Y H , CHEN X D , et al. Interference suppression algorithm based on frequency agility combined with mathematical morphology[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (7): 1491- 1498.
21	于海波, 李晓, 李倩, 等. 脉间随机捷变频脉冲多普勒引信技术[J]. 航空兵器, 2021, 28 (1): 50- 54.
	YU H B , LI X , LI Q , et al. Pulse doppler fuze based on pulse-to-pulse random frequency agility technology[J]. Aero Wea-ponry, 2021, 28 (1): 50- 54.
22	王雪松, 刘建成, 张文明, 等. 间歇采样转发干扰的数学原理[J]. 中国科学E辑: 技术科学, 2006, 36 (8): 891- 901.
	WANG X S , LIU J C , ZHANG W M , et al. Mathematical principle of intermittent sampling repeater jamming[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2006, 36 (8): 891- 901.
23	刘忠, 刘建成, 王雪松, 等. 间歇采样转发干扰信号分析[J]. 电子对抗, 2007, (6): 20- 23.
	LIU Z , LIU J C , WANG X S , et al. Analysis on interrupted-sampling repeater jamming signal[J]. Electronic Warfare, 2007, (6): 20- 23.
24	张建中, 文树梁, 高红卫, 等. 一种基于间歇采样的新型干扰技术及实现[J]. 现代雷达, 2018, 40 (11): 81- 85.
	ZHANG J Z , WEN S L , GAO H W , et al. A new-style jamming technology and implementation based on interrupted-sampling[J]. Modern Radar, 2018, 40 (11): 81- 85.
25	毕金亮. 雷达有源欺骗干扰高效识别算法研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2013.
	BI J L. Study of high probability recognition methods for radar active deception jamming[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2013.
26	祝存海. 基于特征提取的雷达有源干扰信号分类研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2017.
	ZHU C H. Research on radar active jamming signal disturbance classification base on feature extraction[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2017.
27	张建中, 穆贺强, 文树梁, 等. 基于脉内步进LFM波形的抗间歇采样转发干扰方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (5): 1013- 1020.
	ZHANG J Z , MU H Q , WEN S L , et al. Anti interrupted-sampling repeater jamming method based on stepped LFM waveform[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (5): 1013- 1020.
28	张建中, 穆贺强, 文树梁, 等. 基于脉内LFM-Costas频率步进的抗间歇采样干扰方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (10): 2170- 2177.
	ZHANG J Z , MU H Q , WEN S L , et al. Anti intermittent sampling repeater jamming method based on intra-pulse LFM-Costas frequency stepping[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (10): 2170- 2177.
29	XU X Y , XU S Z , JIN L H , et al. Characteristic analysis of Otsu threshold and its applications[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2011, 32 (7): 956- 961.
30	殷苏民, 朱锦萍, 王祖声, 等. 基于顶帽变换和最大类间方差法的图像分割方法研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014, 14 (7): 60- 64.
	YIN S M , ZHU J P , WANG Z S , et al. Research on image segmentation method based on top-hat transformation and Otsu[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14 (7): 60- 64.
31	MARQUES E C , MACIEL N , NAVINER L , et al. A review of sparse recovery algorithms[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 1300- 1322.
32	HUANG T Y, LIU Y M, MENG H D, et al. Randomized step frequency radar with adaptive compressed sensing[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Radar Conference, 2011.
33	柳斌. 不同散射距离下雷达目标RCS及作用距离分析[J]. 电子世界, 2019, 577 (19): 91- 92.
	LIU B . Analysis of radar target RCS and operating range under different scattering range[J]. Electronics Word, 2019, 577 (19): 91- 92.

参数	数值	参数	数值
N	64	K	10
M	100	f₀/GHz	14
Δf/MHz	7	ΔF/MHz	80
T_{_sub}/μs	4	B_sub/MHz	5
R₀/km	10	v/(m/s)	20
PRT/μs	100	—	—