基于功能依赖网的体系效能评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.07.15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

建设与发展有效的装备体系需要依赖合理的效能评估方法。诸多评估方法在复杂依赖关系的量化分析上存在不足, 因此引入功能依赖网络分析(functional dependency network analysis, FDNA)法, 通过双依赖参数、分段线性模型等捕捉体系复杂依赖关系及其造成的级联效应。进而立足FDNA方法的优点, 突破其局限性, 提出基于作战环的功能依赖网络建模规范, 通过链路健康指数、综合依赖关键度、多系统冗余表决系统等调整、新增、完善效能聚合模型, 形成可捕捉和反映更广泛作战场景的扩展FDNA(extended FDNA, E-FDNA)方法。以海上防空反导体系为例, 通过与现有FDNA系列方法以及复杂网络方法在体系效能值、关键系统识别等方面的对比分析, 验证了E-FDNA方法的可行性和有效性, 为装备体系的效能评估提供了新方法。

关键词: 作战体系, 效能评估, 功能依赖网络分析

Abstract:

Developing effective combat system-of-systems (SoS) requires appropriate effectiveness evaluation methods. However, most current evaluation methods are short of capturing the complex interdependencies. This paper thus brings in a functional dependency network analysis (FDNA) method that is able to depict the interdependency relationship and its cascading effects within an SoS, using two interdependency parameters and a piece-wise linear model. This paper keeps the advantages of FDNA while overcoming some of the shortfalls. Particularly, this paper proposes operation loop based modeling rules for building functional dependency network of combat SoSs. Meanwhile, this paper adjusts and completes the effectiveness aggregation model through adding interdependency health index, synthetic criticality of dependency, and multi-systems redundancy voting system. This new extended FDNA (E-FDNA) method is able to reflect the SoS effectiveness under more combat scenarios. In the end, the E-FDNA method is applied to a naval air and missile SoS. The comparison with current FDNA related methods and complex network theory method, regarding the effectiveness value and critical system identification respectively, demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the E-FDNA method. Hence the proposed E-FDNA method offers a new method for SoS effectiveness evaluation.

Key words: combat system-of-systems (SoS), effectiveness evaluation, functional dependency network analysis (FDNA)

中图分类号:

N945.12

浣顺启, 方哲梅, 王剑波. 基于功能依赖网的体系效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(7): 2191-2200.

Shunqi HUAN, Zhemei FAN, Jianbo WANG. System-of-systems effectiveness evaluation method based on functional dependency network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(7): 2191-2200.

图/表 11

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

参考文献 30

1	罗鹏程, 周经伦, 金光. 武器装备体系作战效能与作战能力评估分析方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014: 3- 4.
	LUO P C , ZHOU J L , JIN G . Evaluation and analysis method of combat effectiveness and combat capability of weapon and equipment system[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2014: 3- 4.
2	RAZ A K , KENLEY C R , DELAURENTIS D . A system-of-systems perspective for information fusion system design and evaluation[J]. Information Fusion, 2017, 35, 148- 165. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2016.10.002
3	MOUR A, KENLEY C R, DAVENDRALINGAM N, et al. Agent-based modeling for systems of systems[C]//Proc. of the 23rd INCOSE International Symposium, 2013.
4	FRY D N, CAMPBELL R, DELAURENTIS D. Modeling system-of-systems from multiple design perspectives: agents, interfaces, and architectures[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, 2015.
5	任俊, 胡晓峰, 朱丰. 基于深度学习特征迁移的装备体系效能预测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (12): 2745- 2749. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.12.17
	REN J , HU X F , ZHU F . Effectiveness prediction of weapon equipment system-of-systems based on deep learning feature transfer[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (12): 2745- 2749. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.12.17
6	KIM T G , KANG B G , SEO K M . Communication analysis of network-centric warfare via transformation of system of systems model into integrated system model using neural network[J]. Complexity, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/6201356
7	RAZ A K , WOOD P C , MOCKUS L , et al. System of systems uncertainty quantification using machine learning techniques with smart grid application[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 23 (6): 770- 782. doi: 10.1002/sys.21561
8	殷小静, 胡晓峰, 刘戎翔, 等. 基于GAN的体系能力图谱生成方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (10): 2257- 2264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.14
	YIN X J , HU X F , LIU R X , et al. Generative method of SOS capability maps based on GAN[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (10): 2257- 2264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.14
9	LI J C , TAN Y J , YANG K W , et al. Structural robustness of combat networks of weapon system-of-systems based on the ope-ration loop[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2017, 48 (3): 659- 674. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2016.1212429
10	CHEN K B , LU Y J , LIU Q , et al. A method to validate ope-rational capability index model of heterogeneous combat networks based on characteristic topology analysis[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 59760- 59773. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983082
11	POTTS M W , SARTOR P A , JOHNSON A , et al. A network perspective on assessing system architectures: foundations and challenges[J]. Systems Engineering, 2019, 22 (6): 485- 501. doi: 10.1002/sys.21519
12	POTTS M W , SARTOR P A , JOHNSON A , et al. A network perspective on assessing system architectures: robustness to cascading failure[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 23 (5): 597- 616.
13	GARVEY P R, PINTO C A. Introduction to functional dependency network analysis[C]//Proc. of the 2nd International Symposium on Engineering Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009.
14	GUARINIELLO C , DELAURENTIS D . Supporting design via the system operational dependency analysis methodology[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2016, 28 (1): 53- 69.
15	GUARINIELLO C, GRANDE M, BRAND C, et al. Quantifying the impact of systems interdependencies in space systems architectures[C]//Proc. of the 70th International Astronautical Congress, 2019: 21-25.
16	GUARINIELLO C , DELAURENTIS D . Dependency analysis of system-of-systems operational and development networks[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2013, 16, 265- 274. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.028
17	GUARINIELLO C , DELAURENTIS D . Communications, information, and cyber security in systems-of-systems: assessing the impact of attacks through interdependency analysis[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 28, 720- 727. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.03.086
18	GUARINIELLO C , RAZ A K , FANG Z , et al. System-of-systems tools and techniques for the analysis of cyber-physical systems[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 23 (4): 480- 491. doi: 10.1002/sys.21539
19	孙丽杰, 王剑波, 罗云峰, 等. 体系功能依赖网络参数获取及应用[J]. 兵工自动化, 2018, 37 (1): 40- 44. 40-44, 54
	SUN L J , WANG J B , LUO Y F , et al. Acquisition and application of functional dependency network parameters for system of systems[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2018, 37 (1): 40- 44.40-44, 54
20	张旺勋. 基于复杂交互网络的武器装备体系安全性分析方法[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2015: 86-88.
	ZHANG W X. A weapon system of systems safety analysis method based on complex interaction networks[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2015: 86-88.
21	LUO A M, YI S H, LIU J X, et al. An improved functional dependency network model for information systems effectiveness analysis[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Networks, 2020: 56-59.
22	陈宇奇, 徐廷学, 郝建平, 等. 基于FDN的装备体系任务能力依赖性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (6): 1721- 1728.
	CHEN Y Q , XU T X , HAO J P , et al. Task capability dependency analysis of weapon system of systems based on FDN[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (6): 1721- 1728.
23	陈玉金, 徐吉辉, 史佳辉, 等. 基于FDNA的飞行器系统安全涌现失效模型研究[J]. 电光与控制, 2021, 28 (8): 96- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2021.08.020
	CHEN Y J , XU J H , SHI J H , et al. Research on safety emergent failure of aircraft system based on FDNA[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2021, 28 (8): 96- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2021.08.020
24	王哲, 李建华, 刘子杨, 等. 基于功能依赖的网络信息体系建模及重心分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (10): 2876- 2883. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.10.22
	WANG Z , LI J H , LIU Z Y , et al. Modeling and center of gravity analysis for networked information system of system based on function dependency[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (10): 2876- 2883. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.10.22
25	DELLER S , BOWLING S R , RABADI G A , et al. Applying the information age combat model: quantitative analysis of network centric operations[J]. The International C2 Journal, 2009, 3 (1): 1- 25.
26	谭跃进, 张小可, 杨克巍. 武器装备体系网络化描述与建模方法[J]. 系统管理学报, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2012.06.009
	TAN Y J , ZHANG X K , YANG K W . Research on networked description and modeling methods of armament system-of-systems[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2012.06.009
27	LI J C , GE B F , ZHAO D L , et al. Meta-path-based weapon-target recommendation in heterogeneous combat network[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13 (4): 4433- 4441. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2018.2890090
28	JAMSHIDI M . Systems of systems engineering: principles and applications[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017.
29	郭琳琳, 彭芃, 张建英. 美国航空母舰编队作战能力分析[J]. 雷达与对抗, 2017, 37 (3): 17- 23.
	GUO L L , PENG P , ZHANG J Y . Analysis on combat capability of American carrier strike groups[J]. Radar & ECM, 2017, 37 (3): 17- 23.
30	WINSTEAD P J. Implementation of unmanned surface vehicles in the distributed maritime operations concept[D]. Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School, 2018.

编号	连接规则	描述
1	S→D	传感器节点发送信息给决策节点
2	S→S	传感器节点之间共享信息
3	S→I	传感器将信息发送给打击节点
4	D→I	决策节点将指令或经处理计算后的目标信息发送给打击节点
5	D→D	决策节点之间共享信息
6	A→S	辅助节点为传感器节点提供保障
7	A→D	辅助节点为决策节点提供保障
8	A→I	辅助节点为打击节点提供保障

编号	节点名称	描述	节点类型
1	CVN指控	航母指控功能	D
2	DDG探测1	1号驱逐舰的探测功能	S
3	DDG指控2	1号驱逐舰的指控功能	D
4	DDG指控1	2号驱逐舰的指控功能	D
5	DDG探测2	2号驱逐舰的探测功能	S
6	E-2D探测1	1号预警机的探测功能	S
7	E-2D指控1	1号预警机的指控功能	D
8	E-2D指控2	2号预警机的指控功能	D
9	E-2D探测2	2号预警机的探测功能	S
10	F-35 1	1号F-35战斗机	S
11	EA-18G	电子战飞机	I
12	F-35 2	2号F-35战斗机	S
13~17	F/A-18 1/2/3/4/5	1到5号F/A-18	I
18	UCLASS	负责空中加油的无人机	A
19	CVN保障	航母综合保障功能	A
20	拦截能力	海上防空反导体系拦截能力	C

节点编号	β_S	β_D	β_I	β_A
3、4	15	-	-	-
6、9	40	-	-	-
7、8	10	10	-	-
11	-	5	5	-
13~17	10	5	-	40
20	-	-	0	-

想定	FDNA	SE-FDNA	HI-FDNA	E-FDNA
想定1	95.77	95.77	95.77	92.42
想定2	-	84.66	84.66	79.96
想定3	-	67.65	38.46	16.56
想定4	-	76.56	33.46	90.11

节点名称	体系效能下降绝对值	波及范围
E-2D指控1	71.26	0.4
E-2D指控2	71.26	0.4
EA/18G	42.5	0.1
E-2D探测1	40.29	0.55
E-2D探测2	40.29	0.55
F-35 1	35.79	0.25
F-35 2	35.79	0.25
CVN保障	24.92	0.35
DDG指控2	11.28	0.15
DDG指控1	11.28	0.15
DDG探测1	2.33	0.1
DDG探测2	2.33	0.1
UCLASS	1.79	0.05
F/A-18 1-5	0.8	0.05
CVN指控	0.31	0.15