考虑抑制耦合关系的5G业务故障分析方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.06.33

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 2043-2050.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.06.33

考虑抑制耦合关系的5G业务故障分析方法

陈琨¹, 黄宁^1,^2,*, 吴祥蔚¹, 赵静萌¹

1. 北京航空航天大学可靠性与系统工程学院, 北京 100191
2. 北京航空航天大学可靠性与环境工程技术重点实验室, 北京 100191

收稿日期:2020-12-03 出版日期:2022-05-30 发布日期:2022-05-30
通讯作者: 黄宁
作者简介:陈琨 (1996—), 男, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为网络可靠性|黄宁 (1968—), 女, 教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为网络可靠性|吴祥蔚 (1996—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为网络可靠性中的故障分析与预测|赵静萌 (1997—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为网络可靠性中的多参数耦合关系建模
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61872018)

A 5G application fault analysis method considering suppress coupling relationship

Kun CHEN¹, Ning HUANG^1,^2,*, Xiangwei WU¹, Jingmeng ZHAO¹

1. School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
2. Science and Technology on Reliability and Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Received:2020-12-03 Online:2022-05-30 Published:2022-05-30
Contact: Ning HUANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

5G网络业务对基础设施的共用关系使得其业务故障逻辑更为复杂, 具体体现在业务故障间耦合关系的形成。其中抑制耦合作为一类特殊的业务故障耦合关系, 体现了业务故障间此消彼长、相互抑制的关联关系, 极大程度上影响着业务的运行情况。为了对抑制耦合影响下的5G业务故障进行分析, 本文基于对业务故障间抑制耦合关系的考虑, 提出了耦合故障树分析方法, 基于该方法本文实现了对抑制耦合关系影响下业务故障的解析评估。5G轮胎吊案例的分析与对比, 证明了本文所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 业务故障分析, 抑制耦合, 耦合故障树, 5G轮胎吊

Abstract:

The share of infrastructure between 5G network applications makes its fault logic more complicated, which is reflected in the forming of coupling relationships between application faults. Suppress coupling, as a special type of application fault coupling relationship, embodies the mutual suppression between application faults, which greatly affects the operation of applications. In order to analyze the 5G application fault under the influence of suppressing coupling, a coupled fault tree analysis method is proposed, which can analyse application fault under the influence of suppress coupling relationships. Through the analysis and comparison of 5G rubber-tyred container gantry crane (RTG) cases, the effectiveness of the method proposed is proved.

Key words: application fault analysis, suppress coupling, coupled fault tree, 5G rubber-tyred container gantry crane (RTG)

中图分类号:

TN945

陈琨, 黄宁, 吴祥蔚, 赵静萌. 考虑抑制耦合关系的5G业务故障分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 2043-2050.

Kun CHEN, Ning HUANG, Xiangwei WU, Jingmeng ZHAO. A 5G application fault analysis method considering suppress coupling relationship[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 2043-2050.

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

表3

图4

图5

参考文献 30

1	ZHANG R Z, NING L, LI M K, et al. Feature extraction of tra-jectories for mobility modeling in 5G NB-IoT networks[EB/OL]. [2021-11-03]. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11276-021-02742-8#citeas.
2	REHMAN A , HASEEB K , SABA T , et al. Mobility support 5G architecture with real-time routing for sustainable smart cities[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13 (16): 9092. doi: 10.3390/su13169092
3	ROXANA R , CEDRIC A . The governance of 5G infrastructure: between path dependency and risk-based approaches[J]. Journal of Cybersecurity, 2021, 7 (1): 017.
4	侯筱宇, 张光毅. 多巴胺诱导大鼠海马脑片Ca²⁺钙调素依赖性蛋白激酶Ⅱ活性的抑制作用[J]. 中国药理学报, 1999, 20 (10): 902.
	HOU X Y , ZHANG G Y . Dopamine induced inhibition of Ca²⁺ calmodulin-dependent protein kinase Ⅱ activity in rat hippocampal brain slices[J]. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 1999, 20 (10): 902.
5	李巍, 陈小云. 电路交换域与IMS互通研究[J]. 信息安全与通信保密, 2006, 9, 83- 85.
	LI W , CHEN X Y . Interworking of circuit-switched and IMS[J]. China Information Security, 2006, 9, 83- 85.
6	GUO J L, CUI L, LIU Y, et al. A compact ultra-wideband crossed-dipole antenna for 2G/3G/4G/IMT/5G customer premise equipment applications[EB/OL]. [2021-11-03]. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1631/FITEE.2000456#citeas.
7	YANG K , ZHOU N , ROSTE T . LTE massive MIMO (Pre-5G) test with an updated boat user terminal solution for land-to-boat scenarios in Oslo fjord[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 929 (1): 12010- 12019. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/929/1/012010
8	BISTOUNI F , JAHANSHAHI M . Analyzing the reliability of shuffle-exchange networks using reliability block diagrams[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014, 132, 97- 106.
9	RELKAR , ANAND S . Risk analysis of equipment failure through failure mode and effect analysis and fault tree analysis[J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2021, 21 (3): 793- 805. doi: 10.1007/s11668-021-01117-7
10	SAKAR C , TOZ A C , BUBER M , et al. Risk analysis of grounding accidents by mapping a fault tree into a Bayesian network[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 113 (1): 1- 12.
11	TABESH M, ROOZBAHANI A, HADIGOL F, et al. Risk assessment of water treatment plants using fuzzy fault tree analysis and Monte Carlo simulation[EB/OL]. [2021-11-03]. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40996-020-00498-3#citeas.
12	KUMAR M , KAUSHIK M . System failure probability evaluation using fault tree analysis and expert opinions in intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 67, 104236. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104236
13	LEWIS E E . A load-capacity interference model for common-mode failures in 1-out-of-2: G systems[J]. IEEE Trans.on Reliability, 2001, 50 (1): 47- 51. doi: 10.1109/24.935017
14	CHIACCHIO F , CACIOPPO M , D'URSO D , et al. A Weibull-based compositional approach for hierarchical dynamic fault trees[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2013, 109, 45- 52.
15	MISRA K B . Handbook of performability engineering[M]. London: Springer, 2008.
16	RAUZY A. Binary decision diagrams for reliability studies[M]// MISRA K B, ed. Handbook of Performability Engineering. London: Springer London, 2008: 381-395.
17	BOBBIO A , PORTINALE L , MINICHINO M , et al. Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2001, 71 (3): 249- 260.
18	JUNG W S, YANG J E. Fast calculation methods of importance measures in the fault tree analysis[C]//Proc. of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, 2011: 95-106.
19	LINDHE A , NORBERG T , ROSEN L . Approximate dynamic fault tree calculations for modelling water supply risks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2012, 106, 61- 71.
20	BOUDALI H , CROUZEN P , STOELINGA M . A rigorous, compositional, and extensible framework for dynamic fault tree analysis[J]. IEEE Trans.on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2010, 7 (2): 128- 143. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2009.45
21	JIANG G J, LI Z Y, QIAO G, et al. Reliability analysis of dynamic fault tree based on binary decision diagrams for explosive vehicle[EB/OL]. [2020-12-03]. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2021/5559475/.
22	PAN Z J , NONAKA Y . A new approach for reliability estimation of systems with complex common cause failures[J]. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 1994, 1 (2): 291- 298. doi: 10.1142/S0218539394000210
23	PARRY G W . Comments on basic aspects of stochastic reliabili ty analysis for redundancy systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1989, 24, 377- 381.
24	王家序, 周青华, 肖科, 等. 不完全共因失效系统动态故障树模型分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2012, 34 (5): 1062- 1067. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2012.05.37
	WANG J X , ZHOU Q H , XIAO K , et al. Dynamic fault tree model analysis of systems subjected to incomplete common-cause failure[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34 (5): 1062- 1067. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2012.05.37
25	JAIN M , KUMAR P . Availability analysis of machining system with common cause failure, inspection and imperfect repair[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 91, 451- 460.
26	JIN K , SON K , HEO G . Copula-based common cause failure models with Bayesian inferences[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2021, 53 (2): 357- 367. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2020.08.014
27	黄宁, 伍志韬. 网络可靠性评估模型与算法综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2013, 35 (12): 2651- 2660. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2013.12.32
	HUANG N , WU Z T . Survey of network reliability evaluation models and algorithms[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35 (12): 2651- 2660. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2013.12.32
28	CHEN J Y , FENG Y W , GUO Y N , et al. Dynamic safety assessment of aircraft mechanism using extremum framework with fault tree analysis[J]. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1043 (2): 022052. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1043/2/022052
29	PETERSEN , MAYA L . Compound treatments, transportability, and the structural causal model[J]. Epidemiology, 2011, 22 (3): 378- 381. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182126127
30	JUDEA P . An introduction to causal inference[J]. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2010, 6 (2): 7.

名称	符号	应用范围
交互抑制耦合		同层业务间的故障横向分析
单向抑制耦合		同层业务间的故障横向分析

基础事件	故障概率
M1	p(M1=1)=0.01
M2	p(M2=1)=0.01
M3	p(M3=1)=0.01
M4	p(M4=1)=0.01
M5	p(M5=1)=0.01
M6	p(M6=1)=0.01
M7	p(M7=1)=0.01

事件发生	条件概率数值
M2=1	p(M3=1)=0.006
AM2-2=1	p(AM2-1=1)=0.03
Sa1-3=1	p(Sa1-5=1)=0.06
M6=1	p(M7=1)=0.005
AM2-1=1	p(AM2-2=1)=0.04
Sa1-2=1	p(Sa1-4=1)=0.05

考虑抑制耦合关系的5G业务故障分析方法

A 5G application fault analysis method considering suppress coupling relationship

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 30

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价