稀疏轨道信息下的非合作飞行器机动识别方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.06.22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在已知信息为稀疏轨道根数情况下, 针对非合作飞行器的机动参数识别问题进行了研究, 提出一种基于轨道反演的机动参数识别方法及相应的求解算法。首先, 建立轨道反演模型及机动参数识别优化模型。然后, 提出一种“全局寻优+局部修正”的双重优化算法。最后, 对提出的机动参数识别方法进行了仿真校验。结果显示, 双重优化方法能够有效求解本文的优化模型, 所提方法在误差允许范围内能够有效识别机动参数。研究为有限信息下的非合作飞行器的机动识别提供了一种思路, 一定程度上保障了空间飞行器的在轨安全。

关键词: 非合作飞行器, 稀疏轨道信息, 机动参数识别, 双重优化算法

Abstract:

The maneuvering parameter identification of non-cooperative aircraft is studied when the known information is sparse orbit elements. In this paper, a maneuver parameter identification method based on orbit inversion and its corresponding solution algorithm are proposed. Firstly, the orbit inversion model and the maneuvering parameter identification optimization model are established. Then, a double optimization algorithm of "global optimization plus local correction" is proposed. Finally, the maneuvering parameter identification method proposed is verified by simulation. The results show that the double optimization method can effectively solve the optimization model, and the proposed method can effectively identify maneuvering parameters within an acceptable error range. The research provides an idea for maneuvering identification of non-cooperative aircraft with limited information, and ensures the on-orbit safety of spacecraft to a certain extent.

Key words: non-cooperative aircraft, sparse orbit information, maneuvering parameter identification, double optimization algorithm

中图分类号:

V412.4

赵建磊, 李海阳. 稀疏轨道信息下的非合作飞行器机动识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 1950-1956.

Jianlei ZHAO, Haiyang LI. Maneuvering identification method of non-cooperative aircraft based onsparse orbit information[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 1950-1956.

图/表 11

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

图2

表6

表7

表8

图3

参考文献 30

1	HANDBERG R . Is space war imminent? Exploring the possibility[J]. Comparative Strategy, 2017, 36 (5): 413- 425. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2017.1379832
2	MANULIS M , BRIDGES C P , HARRISON R , et al. Cyber security in new space[J]. International Journal of Information Security, 2021, 20 (3): 287- 311. doi: 10.1007/s10207-020-00503-w
3	STEPHEN B , IVAN O . Future warfare in the western pacific: Chinese antiaccess/area denial, U.S. airsea battle, and command of the commons in East Asia[J]. International Security, 2016, 41 (1): 7- 48. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00249
4	李振瑜. 航天器追逃博弈路径规划与控制技术[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2019.
	LI Z Y. Trajectory planning and control technology for spacecraft orbital pursuit-evasion game[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2019.
5	DEFRIEZE D C . Defining and regulating the weaponization of space[J]. Joint Force Quarterly, 2014, 74 (3): 110- 115.
6	徐纬地. 太空安全博弈与国际航天合作: 空间交通管理视角下的太空安全态势与中国对策思考[J]. 空间碎片研究, 2021, 21 (1): 18- 25.
	XU W D . Space competition and cooperation: current space security and chinese responsive approaches[J]. Space Debris Research, 2021, 21 (1): 18- 25.
7	DAVIS M . South Asia and space security[J]. Astropolitics, 2019, 17 (1): 62- 69. doi: 10.1080/14777622.2019.1578935
8	SONG W D , WANG R L , WANG J . A simple and valid analysis method for orbit anomaly detection[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2012, 49 (2): 386- 391. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2011.10.007
9	PATERA R P . Space event detection method[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2008, 45 (3): 554- 559.
10	HUANG G W , QIN Z W , ZHANG Q . An optimized method to detect BDS satellites'orbit maneuvering and anomalies in real-time[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18 (3): 7- 26.
11	LEAKKAW P , PANICHPAPIBOON S . Real-time vehicle maneuvering detection with digital compass[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9, 102549- 102558. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097752
12	李涛, 黄昊, 陈磊. 利用预报误差分布拟合实现卫星历史轨道机动检测的方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2020, 42 (2): 114- 120.
	LI T , HUANG H , CHEN L . Method to detect satellite historical orbit maneuver based on fitting of prediction error distribution[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2020, 42 (2): 114- 120.
13	JING Q , WU C . Beidou satellite maneuver thrust force estimation for precise orbit determination[J]. GPS Solutions, 2018, 22 (2): 3644- 3654.
14	KELECY T , JAH M . Detection and orbit determination of a satellite executing low thrust maneuvers[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2010, 66 (5): 798- 809.
15	LEMMENS S , KRAG H . Two-line-elements based maneuver detection methods for satellites in low earth orbit[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37 (3): 860- 868. doi: 10.2514/1.61300
16	PITTELKAU M. Space object maneuver detection algorithms using TLE data[C]//Proc. of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2016: 20-23.
17	ACQUESTA, ERIN C S, VALICKA, et al. Review of tracktable for satellite maneuver detection[R]. New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories, 2016.
18	BAI X , LIAO C , PAN X , et al. Mining two-line element data to detect orbital maneuver for satellite[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 129537- 129550. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940248
19	YU S X , WANG X , ZHU T L . Maneuver detection methods for space objects based on dynamical model[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2021, 68 (1): 71- 84. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.03.011
20	DANIEL A M , MARCUS J H . Spacecraft custody maintenance and maneuver detection using robotic telescopes and reachable sets[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2021, (4): 667- 683.
21	BAO Z C , JIANG Q X , LIU F Z . Multiple model efficient particle filter based track-before-detect for maneuvering weak targets[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31 (4): 647- 656. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2020.000040
22	CLARK R , LEE R . Parallel processing for orbital maneuver detection[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2020, 66 (2): 444- 449. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.010
23	JUSTIN S , MORIBA K J , DANIEL K , et al. Near real time satellite event detection, characterization, and operational assessment via the exploitation of remote photoacoustic signatures[J]. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2021, 68 (1): 197- 224. doi: 10.1007/s40295-021-00252-5
24	JIANG Y Z , BAOYIN H X . Robust extended Kalman filter with input estimation for maneuver tracking[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31 (9): 1910- 1919. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.06.014
25	CHRISTOPHER L B. Abnormal orbital event detection, characterization, and prediction[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace, Reston, 2015.
26	LI T , CHEN L . Historical-orbital-data-based method for monitoring the operational statusof satellites in low Earth orbit[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 151, 88- 94. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.010
27	LI T , LI K B , CHEN L . New manoeuvre detection method based on historical orbital datafor low Earth orbit satellites[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2018, 62 (3): 554- 567. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.002
28	LI T , CHEN L . Space event detection method based on cluster analysis of satellite historical orbital data[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2019, 160, 414- 420. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.04.038
29	崔红正, 刘文玲, 唐歌实, 等. 不同推力下的非合作空间目标轨道机动检测[J]. 宇航学报, 2016, 37 (3): 253- 261.
	CUI H Z , LIU W L , TANG G S , et al. Different thrust maneuvers detection of uncooperative space objects[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37 (3): 253- 261.
30	王庆瑞, 邹江威, 吴文振, 等. 基于Neyman-Pearson准则的空间目标轨道机动检测方法[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 2021, 41 (2): 96- 103.
	WANG Q R , ZOU J W , WU W Z , et al. Orbital maneuver detection method of space target based onNeyman-Pearson criterion[J]. Chinese Space Science and Technology, 2021, 41 (2): 96- 103.

轨道根数	数值
半长轴/km	41 998.169 8
偏心率	0.001 012
轨道倾角/(°)	0.100 781
升交点赤经/(°)	100.325 974
近地点角距/(°)	93.206 678
真近点角/(°)	212.213 330

时间	机动参数/(m·s^-1)
2020 12:00:00.000	(3, 0, 0)
2020 00:00:00.000	(3, 1, 3)

工况	轨道迹向σ_x/m	轨道法向σ_y/m	轨道径向σ_z/m
工况1	500	500	500
工况2	750	375	375
工况3	1 000	1 000	1 000

工况	时间均方根误差/min	速度均方根误差/(m·s^-1)
工况1	3.59	0.109
工况2	4.12	0.123
工况3	8.06	0.278

序号	时间	定轨结果
1	2020 07:00:00.000	(41 996 513.117, 0.001 048, 0.101 429, 100.940 181, 93.276 745, 211.528 636)
2	2020 14:00:00.000	(42 079 340.303, 0.002 416, 0.102 038, 100.541 115, 43.142 503, 7.984 109)
3	2020 21:00:00.000	(42 079 699.105, 0.002 362, 0.103 964, 99.668 523, 44.743 716, 113.079 450)
4	2020 04:00:00.000	(42 160 333.026, 0.001 954, 0.089 816, 96.610 264, 107.420 106, 158.607 188)