基于Beta过程的高分辨ISAR成像

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.06.13

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1873-1879.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.06.13

基于Beta过程的高分辨ISAR成像

徐安林^1,*, 张毓², 周峰²

1. 中国人民解放军63921部队, 北京 100094
2. 西安电子科技大学电子工程学院, 陕西西安 710071

收稿日期:2020-07-07 出版日期:2022-05-30 发布日期:2022-05-30
通讯作者: 徐安林
作者简介:徐安林(1984—), 男, 助理研究员, 硕士, 主要研究方向为航天系统总体、空间科学与应用系统、雷达成像|张毓(1995—), 男, 硕士, 主要研究方向为非参数贝叶斯及高分辨ISAR成像|周峰(1980—), 男, 教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为高分辨雷达成像及对抗
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61971332);国家自然科学基金(61631019);国家自然科学基金(61801344)

High resolution ISAR imaging based on Beta process

Anlin XU^1,*, Yu ZHANG², Feng ZHOU²

1. Unit 63921 of the PLA, Beijing 100094, China
2. School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China

Received:2020-07-07 Online:2022-05-30 Published:2022-05-30
Contact: Anlin XU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对于高信噪比、完整回波、目标平稳运动等理想观测环境, 现有成像技术已经较为成熟, 可以获得聚焦良好的高分辨逆合成孔径雷达(inverse synthetic aperture radar, ISAR)像。但在实际中的方位回波缺损与低信噪比观测情况下, 随机相位误差等因素会降低现有成像算法的性能甚至使其失效。本文首先建立了ISAR稀疏观测模型, 并基于稀疏贝叶斯学习理论, 通过引入Beta过程非参数先验构建层级概率模型, 进而交替利用Gibbs采样及最大似然方法对ISAR像及随机相位误差进行估计。实验结果表明, 所提方法在低信噪比、回波缺损等复杂观测环境下能够获得聚焦良好的ISAR图像。

关键词: 逆合成孔径雷达, 高分辨成像, 稀疏贝叶斯学习, Beta过程

Abstract:

For ideal observation environments such as high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), complete echoes and steadily moving targets, the available imaging techniques are mature to obtain high-resolution and well-focused inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) images. However, in practical situations, factors such as azimuth sparse observation, low SNR, and random phase errors will reduce the performance of traditional algorithms or invalidate them. Based on the sparse Bayesian learning theory, this paper establishes the sparse observation model of ISAR and constructs the hierarchical probabilistic model by introducing the non-parametric Beta process prior. Then, Gibbs sampling and maximum likelihood estimation are utilized iteratively to estimate the ISAR image and the random phase errors. Experiments have demonstrated that in low SNR and incomplete data scenarios, well-focused imaging can be obtained by the proposed method.

Key words: inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR), high resolution imaging, sparse Bayesian learning, Beta process

中图分类号:

TN958

徐安林, 张毓, 周峰. 基于Beta过程的高分辨ISAR成像[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 1873-1879.

Anlin XU, Yu ZHANG, Feng ZHOU. High resolution ISAR imaging based on Beta process[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(6): 1873-1879.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

表2

参考文献 22

1	CZERWINSKI M G , USOFF J M . Development of the haystack ultrawideband satellite imaging radar[J]. Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 2014, 21 (1): 28- 44.
2	SNYDER D L . High resolution radar imaging[M]. Dedham, MA: Artech House, 1981.
3	CHEN C C , ANDREWS H C . Target-motion-induced radar ima-ging[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1980, 16 (1): 2- 14.
4	HERMAN M A , STROHMER T . High-resolution radar via compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2009, 57 (6): 2275- 2284. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2009.2014277
5	POTTER L C , ERTIN E , PARKER J T , et al. Sparsity and compressed sensing in radar imaging[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2010, 98 (6): 1006- 1020. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2037526
6	ENDER J H . On compressive sensing applied to radar[J]. Signal Processing, 2010, 90 (5): 1402- 1414. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.11.009
7	ZHANG L , XING M D , QIU C W , et al. Resolution enhancement for inversed synthetic aperture radar imaging under low SNR via improved compressive sensing[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48 (10): 3824- 3838. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2048575
8	ZHAO L F , WANG L , YANG L , et al. The race to improve radar imagery: an overview of recent progress in statistical sparsity-based techniques[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2016, 33 (6): 85- 102. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2016.2573847
9	MALLET S G , ZHANG Z . Matching pursuits with-frequency dictionaries[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 1993, 41 (12): 3397- 3415. doi: 10.1109/78.258082
10	PATI Y C, REZAIIFAR R, KRISHNAPRASAD P S. Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition[C]//Proc. of the 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, System, Computation, 1993: 40-44.
11	DONOHO D L, ELAD M. Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via l¹ minimization[C]//Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003: 2197-2202.
12	DONOHO D L , ELAD M , TEMLYAKOV V N . Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise[J]. IEEE Trans.on Information Theory, 2006, 52 (1): 6- 18. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2005.860430
13	WU Y L , ZHANG S S , KANG H Q , et al. Fast marginalized sparse Bayesian learning for 3-D interferometric ISAR image formation via super-resolution ISAR imaging[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2015, 8 (10): 4942- 4951. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2455508
14	XU G , YANG L , BI G A , et al. Enhanced ISAR imaging and motion estimation with parametric and dynamic sparse Bayesian learning[J]. IEEE Trans.on Computational Imaging, 2017, 3 (4): 940- 952. doi: 10.1109/TCI.2017.2750330
15	BABACAN S D , MOLINA R , KATSAGGELOS A K . Baye-sian compressive sensing using Laplace priors[J]. IEEE Trans.on Image Processing, 2010, 19 (1): 53- 63. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2009.2032894
16	TIPPING M E . Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2001, 1 (1): 211- 244.
17	BISHOP C M, TIPPING M E. Variational relevance vector machines[C]//Proc. of the 16th Conference Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence, 2000: 46-53.
18	PERRY R P , DIPIETRO R C , FANTE R L . SAR imaging of moving targets[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1999, 35 (1): 188- 199. doi: 10.1109/7.745691
19	BAI X R , ZHOU F , WANG Q , et al. Sparse subband imaging of space targets in high-speed motion[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51 (7): 4144- 4154. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227756
20	PAISLEY J, CARIN L. Nonparametric factor analysis with Beta process priors[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2009.
21	CHEN B, PAISLEY J, CARIN L. Sparse linear regression with Beta process priors[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech & Signal Processing, 2010: 14-19.
22	张毓. 基于非参数贝叶斯的ISAR稀疏成像研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2020.
	ZHANG Y. Study on sparse ISAR imaging based on Bayesian nonparametrics[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2020.

成像算法	图像熵
OMP	2.449 6
L1	3.313 6
RVM	0.503 8
BPLR	0.069 5

成像算法	图像熵
OMP	1.871 0
L1	2.883 8
RVM	0.197 1
BPLR	0.070 5

[1]	刘丰恺, 黄大荣, 郭新荣, 冯存前. 基于吕氏分布的机动目标参数化平动补偿方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1166-1173.
[2]	张俊, 张新禹, 姜卫东, 刘永祥, 黎湘. 基于广义近似消息传递的快速DOA估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 2995-3002.
[3]	李冬霞, 陈秋雨, 王磊, 刘海涛. 基于BSBL-BO算法的DME脉冲干扰抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2649-2656.
[4]	薛东方, 朱晓秀, 胡文华, 郭宝锋, 曾慧燕. 基于加权l₁范数优化的双基地ISAR稀疏成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 944-953.
[5]	蒲涛, 童宁宁, 冯为可, 房亮, 高晓阳. 基于块稀疏矩阵恢复的MIMO雷达扩展目标高分辨成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(3): 647-655.
[6]	韩立珣, 田波, 冯存前. 基于MIMO-ISAR的弹道目标结构参数估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(3): 603-612.
[7]	徐楚, 朱栋强, 汪玲, 王洁. 基于零空间l₁范数最小化的ISAR成像方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(2): 315-321.
[8]	杜毅, 廖可非, 欧阳缮, 陈怡君. ISAR成像系统的二维资源自适应调度算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(2): 339-345.
[9]	朱福珍, 邹丹妮, 王志芳, 巫红. 双参数Beta过程联合字典遥感图像超分辨[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(9): 1955-1960.
[10]	袁骏, 肖卉, 蔡志明, 奚畅. 基于稀疏贝叶斯学习的拖曳线列阵空间谱估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(6): 1202-1209.
[11]	张永顺, 朱卫纲, 贾鑫, 王满喜. 基于块稀疏贝叶斯学习的直扩通信窄带干扰检测与参数估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(4): 889-897.
[12]	王超, 叶春茂, 文树梁. 低重频宽带雷达中小幅微动目标的周期估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(9): 1945-1952.
[13]	朱晓秀, 胡文华, 马俊涛, 郭宝锋. 基于Laplace先验的复贝叶斯压缩感知ISAR高分辨成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(12): 2689-2698.
[14]	冯俊杰, 张弓. 多测量向量块稀疏信号重构ISAR成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(9): 1959-1964.
[15]	黄勇, 段锐, 张海, 颜光宇. 空间微动目标极化欺骗式干扰信号合成方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(8): 1738-1743.

基于Beta过程的高分辨ISAR成像

High resolution ISAR imaging based on Beta process

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价