基于模型的无人机系统架构综合评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.04.21

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 1239-1245.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.04.21

基于模型的无人机系统架构综合评估方法

卢元杰*, 刘志敏, 孙智孝, 阚东

沈阳飞机设计研究所, 辽宁沈阳 110035

收稿日期:2021-03-18 出版日期:2022-04-01 发布日期:2022-04-01
通讯作者: 卢元杰
作者简介:卢元杰(1982—), 男, 高级工程师, 博士, 主要研究方向为飞行器设计、系统工程|刘志敏(1965—), 男, 研究员, 博士, 主要研究方向为飞行器设计|孙智孝(1976—), 男, 研究员, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为飞行器设计|阚东(1988—), 男, 高级工程师, 硕士, 主要研究方向为需求开发与管理
基金资助:
国防基础科研计划(JCKY2016205A005)

Model-based integrated evaluation of UAV system architecture

Yuanjie LU*, Zhimin LIU, Zhixiao SUN, Dong KAN

Shenyang Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Shenyang 110035, China

Received:2021-03-18 Online:2022-04-01 Published:2022-04-01
Contact: Yuanjie LU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

系统架构综合评估是无人机(unmanned aerial vehicle, UAV)研制中的重要环节, 本文从UAV总体设计的需求出发, 提出了系统架构综合评估指标体系的全面性和层次性原则。根据基于模型的系统工程方法构建了三级评估指标体系。通过将系统架构模型的仿真结果作为评估指标体系的输入, 建立了一种系统架构模型与评估模型关联的综合评估分析方法, 以达到UAV总体技术方案快速闭环设计与优化的目标。面向工程应用, 开发了一个系统架构多方案权衡软件。以某UAV系统架构综合评估作为实例, 验证了方法与工具的正确性和工程实用性。

关键词: 无人机, 总体设计, 系统架构, 综合评估, 基于模型的系统工程, 指标体系, 权衡

Abstract:

Integrated evaluation of system architecture is an important phase in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) development. Based on the conceptual and preliminary design requirements of UAV, the comprehensive and hierarchical criteria of the integrated evaluation measures relationship of the system architecture are established. According to the model-based systems engineering approach, three-level evaluation measures system is constructed. By using the simulation results of the system architecture model as the input of the evaluation measure, the integrated evaluation and analysis method of seamless connection between the system architecture model and the evaluation model is established to meet the needs of rapid closed-loop design and optimization for the conceptual and preliminary solution of UAV. Facing engineering applications, system architecture trade-off software is developed. Taking the integrated evaluation of UAV system architecture as an example, the correctness and practicability of the method and the tool are verified.

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), conceptual and preliminary design, system architecture, integrated evaluation, model-based systems engineering, measures system, trade-off

中图分类号:

V221.8

卢元杰, 刘志敏, 孙智孝, 阚东. 基于模型的无人机系统架构综合评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1239-1245.

Yuanjie LU, Zhimin LIU, Zhixiao SUN, Dong KAN. Model-based integrated evaluation of UAV system architecture[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(4): 1239-1245.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表1

参考文献 17

1	顾诵芬. 飞机总体设计[M]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2002.
	GU S F . Aircraft conceptual and preliminary design[M]. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 2002.
2	余雄庆. 飞机总体多学科设计优化的现状与发展方向[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2008, 40 (4): 417- 426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2615.2008.04.001
	YU X Q . Multidisciplinary design optimization for aircraft conceptual and preliminary design: status and directions[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2008, 40 (4): 417- 426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2615.2008.04.001
3	SAE ARP 4754A. Guidelines for development of civil aircraft and systems[S]. Warrendale, PA: SAE International, 2010.
4	ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288. Systems and software engineering— system life cycle processes[S]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2015.
5	MANN C . A practical guide to SysML: the systems modeling language[J]. Kybernetes, 2009, 38 (2): 989- 994.
6	HOFFMANN H. SysML-based systems engineering using a model-driven development approach[C]//Proc. of the INCOSE International Symposium, 2006, 16(1): 804-814.
7	WALDEN D D , ROEDLER G J , FORSBERG K J , et al. Systems engineering handbook—a guide for system life cycle processes and activities[M]. 4th ed New Jersey: Wiley, 2015.
8	AL-AHMED S, FIELDING J. Integrating combat effectiveness disciplines into the conceptual/preliminary design process[C]//Proc. of the 1st AIAA Aircraft Engineering, Technology, and Operations Congress, 1995.
9	MAVRIS D, DELAURENTIS D. An integrated approach to military aircraft selection and concept evaluation[C]//Proc. of the 1st AIAA Aircraft Engineering, Technology, and Operations Congress, 1995.
10	刘晓东, 宋笔锋. 作战飞机总体设计方案评审指标体系研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2004, 26 (4): 449- 453. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2004.04.008
	LIU X D , SONG B F . Research on the index systems for conceptual/preliminary design comprehensive evaluation of combat aircraft[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26 (4): 449- 453. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2004.04.008
11	黄俊, 武哲, 孙惠中, 等. 作战飞机总体设计评价准则和评估方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2000, 21 (1): 70- 73. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2000.01.016
	HUANG J , WU Z , SUN H Z , et al. Study on evaluation criteria and assessment methodology for conceptual/preliminary design of combat aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2000, 21 (1): 70- 73. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2000.01.016
12	朱力立, 李庄生, 许宗泽. 飞机综合航电系统总体设计综合评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28 (3): 685- 689. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2007.03.033
	ZHU L L , LI Z S , XU Z Z . Integrated approach to overall design evaluation for integrated avionics system of aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28 (3): 685- 689. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2007.03.033
13	SELVA D, CRAWLEY E F. Integrated assessment of packaging architectures in earth observing programs[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2010: 1-17.
14	KASLOW D, SOREMEKUN G, KIM H, et al. Integrated model-based systems engineering (MBSE) applied to the simulation of a CubeSat mission[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2014: 1-14.
15	KASLOW D, AYRES B J, CAHILL P T, et al. CubeSat model-based system engineering (MBSE) reference model-development and distribution-interim status[C]//Proc. of the AIAA SPACE, 2016.
16	CENCETTI M, PASQUINELLI M. MAGGIORE P. System modeling framework and MDO tool integration: MBSE methodologies applied to design and analysis of space system[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, 2013.
17	BAGDATLI B, KARAGOZ F, REILLEY K, et al. MBSE-enabled interactive environment for aircraft conceptual sizing & synthesis[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Scitech Forum, 2019.

三级指标	方案1	方案2
可见光识别距离/km	40	50
红外识别距离/km	70	80
激光测距距离/km	50	55
目标识别时间/ms	49.7	65.3
目标识别概率/%	84.6	72.8
无源定位精度/m	105.6	82.1
无源定位收敛时间/s	27.5	16.2

[1]	孙田野, 孙伟, 吴建军. 改进Quatre算法的无人机编队快速集结方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2840-2848.
[2]	余婧, 雍恩米, 陈汉洋, 郝东, 张显才. 面向多无人机协同对地攻击的双层任务规划方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2849-2857.
[3]	徐星光, 王晓峰, 姚璐, 任章. 固定翼无人机编队构型与通信拓扑优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2936-2946.
[4]	杨建峰, 肖和业, 李亮, 白俊强, 董维浩. 基于模糊聚类和专家评分机制的无人机多层次模块划分方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(8): 2530-2539.
[5]	李洪瑶, 李小强, 韩心中, 谢学立, 席建祥. 基于决策融合的多无人机协同目标检测识别算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 746-754.
[6]	张源原, 高阳, 朱鹏, 刘锦涛, 谷树山. 基于着色Petri网的无人机侦察战术规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 900-907.
[7]	谷旭平, 唐大全. 基于联邦滤波算法的无人机集群分层协同导航[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 967-976.
[8]	余雪勇, 朱烨, 邱礼翔, 朱洪波. 基于无人机辅助边缘计算系统的节能卸载策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 1022-1029.
[9]	杨兴家, 段克清, 李想, 祁炜. 无人机集群协同探测距离解模糊方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 480-489.
[10]	符小卫, 潘静. 无人机集群规避动态障碍物的分布式队形控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 529-537.
[11]	陈都, 孟秀云. 基于自适应郊狼算法的无人机离线航迹规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 603-611.
[12]	刘步花, 丁丹, 杨柳, 薛乃阳, 刘仲谦. 基于DNN的无人机数据OFDM传输技术[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 696-702.
[13]	吴志鹏, 张平, 李震, 黄磊, 刘畅, 高硕. 基于轻小型无人机雷达的植被高度反演方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3667-3675.
[14]	王玉佳, 方伟, 徐涛, 余应福, 邓博元. 基于遗传模糊树的海空对抗无人机智能决策模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3756-3765.
[15]	杨文奇, 卢建华, 姜旭, 王元鑫. 基于改进ESO的四旋翼姿态自抗扰控制器设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3792-3799.

基于模型的无人机系统架构综合评估方法

Model-based integrated evaluation of UAV system architecture

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价