基于限制优势关系的航天装备备件品种确定

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.02.28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

航天装备备件品种确定是实现航天装备精确保障的重要基础。针对航天装备备件品种确定过程中决策信息不完备、犹豫性、模糊性等特点突出的问题, 提出基于限制优势关系的备件品种确定方法。引入犹豫模糊集和粗糙集理论, 建立备件品种确定的犹豫模糊决策信息系统, 基于限制优势关系实现决策属性的约简和决策规则的获取, 构建基于限制优势关系的备件品种确定模型, 最后以某航天测控装备为例进行了案例分析与应用, 证明了方法的可行性与有效性。

关键词: 航天装备, 备件, 品种确定, 限制优势关系

Abstract:

The variety determination of spare parts for space equipment is an important basis for accurate support of space equipment. In order to solve the problem of incomplete decision-making information, hesitation and fuzziness in the process of determining, the variety determination of spare parts based on the relation of limited advantages is proposed. Hesitant fuzzy set and rough set theory are introduced to set up the varieties of spare parts to determine the hesitation of fuzzy decision information system. Based on the limited advantages relation decision attribute reduction and decision rule acquision, the model of the spare parts variety determination based on the limited advantages relation is built. Finally, the space tracking and control station equipment is taken as an example for case analysis and application to prove the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key words: space equipment, spare parts, variety determination, limited dominance relation

中图分类号:

杨超, 侯兴明, 秦海峰, 陈小卫. 基于限制优势关系的航天装备备件品种确定[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 584-591.

Chao YANG, Xingming HOU, Haifeng QIN, Xiaowei CHEN. Variety determination of spare parts for space equipment based on the relationship of limited advantages[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 584-591.

图/表 4

图1

图2

表1

表2

参考文献 27

1	Joint Chiefsof Staff . Space operations[M]. Washington: Joint Publication, 2018: 2- 4.
2	尹志忠. 世界军事航天发展概论[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2015: 7- 8.
	YIN Z Z . Introduction of the world military space development[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2015: 7- 8.
3	王静, 秦吉良, 尹子盟, 等. 装备备件资源预测与优化技术研究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2016, (4): 56- 58.
	WANG J , QIN J L , YIN Z M , et al. Research on spare parts prediction and optimization for equipment[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2016, (4): 56- 58.
4	王亚彬, 贾希胜. 装备维修资源优化决策理论与技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2018: 49- 50.
	WANG Y B , JIA X S . Equipment maintenance resource optimization decision theory and technology[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2018: 49- 50.
5	陈修学, 赵建忠. 价值工程法在导弹装备备件品种确定中的应用[J]. 航空兵器, 2009, (2): 57- 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5048.2009.02.014
	CHEN X X , ZHAO J Z . Determining methods of spare sort in missile equipment[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2009, (2): 57- 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5048.2009.02.014
6	孙立军, 花兴来, 张衡. 用价值工程理论确定雷达备件品种[J]. 空军雷达学院学报, 2004, 18 (4): 71- 73.
	SUN L J , HUA X L , ZHANG H . Confirming spare parts varieties by value engineering theories[J]. Journal of Air Force Radar Academy, 2004, 18 (4): 71- 73.
7	徐卫童, 康建设, 董良东. 备件品种的确定方法[J]. 兵工自动化, 2007, 26 (4): 30- 31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1576.2007.04.015
	XU W T , KANG J S , DONG L D . Determining methods of spare sort[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2007, 26 (4): 30- 31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1576.2007.04.015
8	季嘉伟, 孙国文, 罗佳伟. 基于模糊综合评判的电源车战场抢修备件品种研究[J]. 装备制造技术, 2017, (7): 214- 216. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-545X.2017.07.072
	JI J W , SUN G W , LUO J W . Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of BDAR spare parts varieties of aircraft power vehicle[J]. Equipment Manufacturing Technology, 2017, (7): 214- 216. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-545X.2017.07.072
9	张帅, 唐金国, 俞金松, 等. 基于属性的舰载机航材备件品种确定方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2015, 40 (7): 87- 91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2015.07.022
	ZHANG S , TANG J G , YU J S , et al. Research on determining methods of carrier-based aviation spare variety based on attribute analysis[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2015, 40 (7): 87- 91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2015.07.022
10	翟胜路, 张作刚. 基于模糊综合评判法的战储备件品种确定[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2011, 31 (12): 150- 153. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1627-9730.2011.12.041
	ZHAI S L , ZHANG Z G . Variety as certain of parts at wartime based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2011, 31 (12): 150- 153. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1627-9730.2011.12.041
11	李云峰, 王瑞林, 贾云非, 等. 基于灰色局势对策的备件品种级别配置[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2011, 36 (11): 184- 185, 189. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2011.11.047
	LI Y F , WANG R L , JIA Y F , et al. Application of grey situation decision approach to determining the assortment of spares and level of repair[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2011, 36 (11): 184- 185, 189. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2011.11.047
12	周一鸣, 王茜, 荣鹏辉, 等. 基于灰色局势决策的航空弹药保障装备备件品种确定方法[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2017, 40 (5): 56- 59, 101.
	ZHOU Y M , WANG Q , RONG P H , et al. Determination method of spare part varieties for air ammunition support equipment based on grey situation decision-making[J]. Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, 2017, 40 (5): 56- 59, 101.
13	黄建新, 杨建军, 张志峰. 基于不完备信息的粗糙集确定备件品种[J]. 装备指挥技术学院学报, 2005, 16 (3): 45- 47.
	HUANG J X , YANG J J , ZHANG Z F . Defining the class of spare parts based on the rough set of incomplete information[J]. Journal of Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, 2005, 16 (3): 45- 47.
14	董骁雄, 陈云翔, 蔡忠义, 等. 基于不完备信息的粗糙集初始备件品种确定方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40 (3): 590- 594.
	DONG X X , CHEN Y X , CAI Z Y , et al. Method for determining initial spares varieties of rough set based on incomplete information[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (3): 590- 594.
15	TORRA V . Hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25 (6): 529- 539.
16	徐泽水, 赵华. 犹豫模糊集理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
	XU Z S , ZHAO H . Theory of hesitation fuzzy set and its application[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019.
17	PAWLAK Z . Rough sets[J]. International Journal of Computer and Information Science, 1982, 11 (5): 341- 356. doi: 10.1007/BF01001956
18	梁吉业, 曲开社, 徐宗本. 信息系统的属性约简[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2001, 21 (12): 76- 80. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2001.12.014
	LIANG J Y , QU K S , XU Z B . Reduction of attribute in information systems[J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2001, 21 (12): 76- 80. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2001.12.014
19	张文修, 吴伟志, 梁吉业, 等. 粗糙集理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001: 206- 207.
	ZHANG W X , WU W Z , LIANG J Y , et al. Rough set theory and method[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001: 206- 207.
20	GRECO S , INUIGUCHI M , SLOWINSKI R . Fuzzy rough sets and multiple premise gradual decision rules[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2006, 41 (2): 179- 211. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2005.06.014
21	骆公志, 杨晓江, 刘思峰. 基于限制优势关系的粗糙模糊集及知识约简[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32 (8): 1658- 1661.
	LUO G Z , YANG X J , LIU S F . Limited dominance-based rough fuzzy set and knowledge reductions[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32 (8): 1658- 1661.
22	DU W S , HU B Q . Dominance-based rough set approach to incomplete ordered information systems[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 346, 106- 129.
23	LUO G Z , YANG X B . Limited dominance-based rough set model and knowledge reductions in incomplete decision system[J]. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 2010, 26 (6): 2199- 2211.
24	ZHANG H D , SHU L , XIONG L L . On novel hesitant fuzzy rough sets[J]. Soft Computing, 2019, 23 (22): 11357- 11371. doi: 10.1007/s00500-019-04037-9
25	DEEPAK D , JOHN S J . Hesitant fuzzy rough sets through hesitant fuzzy relation[J]. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 2014, 8 (1): 33- 46.
26	朱丽, 朱传喜, 张小芝. 不完备犹豫模糊混合信息系统的属性约简[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2015, 29 (2): 150- 156.
	ZHU L , ZHU C X , ZHANG X Z . Attribute reductions in incomplete hesitant fuzzy hybrid information systems[J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2015, 29 (2): 150- 156.
27	齐爽, 王艳平. 模糊等价关系下的犹豫模糊粗糙集及其应用[J]. 井冈山大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39 (5): 1- 6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8085.2018.05.001
	QI S , WANG Y P . Hesitant fuzzy rough set based on similarity and its application[J]. Journal of Jinggangshan University(Nature Science), 2018, 39 (5): 1- 6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8085.2018.05.001

U	c₁	c₂	c₃	c₄	D
x₁	(0.45, 0.65, 0.8)	(0.6, 0.75, 0.9)	*	(0.7, 0.85, 0.9)	(0.6, 0.75, 0.8)
x₂	(0.7, 0.75, 0.9)	(0.2, 0.3, 0.3)	(0.75, 0.8, 0.9)	(0.3, 0.4, 0.4)	(0.2, 0.3, 0.4)
x₃	(0.65, 0.7, 0.85)	(0.65, 0.8, 0.95)	(0.8, 0.8, 0.9)	(0.7, 0.9, 0.95)	(0.5, 0.6, 0.7)
x₄	(0.2, 0.3, 0.4)	(0.5, 0.6, 0.7)	(0.2, 0.2, 0.3)	(0.4, 0.5, 0.7)	(0.1, 0.1, 0.2)
x₅	(0.1, 0.3, 0.4)	(0.1, 0.2, 0.2)	(0.1, 0.2, 0.3)	(0.2, 0.3, 0.5)	(0.3, 0.5, 0.6)
x₆	(0.1, 0.2, 0.3)	*	(0.3, 0.35, 0.5)	(0.5, 0.6, 0.8)	(0.2, 0.3, 0.4)
x₇	(0.2, 0.3, 0.4)	(0.6, 0.8, 0.9)	(0.7, 0.8, 0.9)	*	(0.7, 0.8, 0.9)
x₈	*	(0.8, 0.85, 0.9)	(0.7, 0.8, 0.9)	(0.4, 0.5, 0.6)	(0.5, 0.6, 0.65)

U	x₁	x₂	x₃	x₄	x₅	x₆	x₇	x₈
$ {\omega _{{{\underline C }^L}(d)}}(x)$	(0.5, 0.6, 0.7)	(0.2, 0.3, 0.4)	(0.5, 0.6, 0.7)	(0.1, 0.1, 0.2)	(0.1, 0.1, 0.2)	(0.2, 0.3, 0.4)	(0.5, 0.6, 0.7)	(0.5, 0.6, 0.65)
${\omega _{{{\overline C }^L}(d)}}(x) $	(0.6, 0.75, 0.8)	(0.3, 0.5, 0.6)	(0.7, 0.8, 0.9)	(0.3, 0.5, 0.6)	(0.3, 0.5, 0.6)	(0.2, 0.3, 0.4)	(0.7, 0.8, 0.9)	(0.5, 0.6, 0.65)

[1]	徐立, 阮旻智, 李华. 对数正态型通用备件满足率评估及需求量计算方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1417-1423.
[2]	李京峰, 陈云翔, 项华春, 王健. 考虑随机冲击影响的多部件系统视情维修与备件库存联合优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 875-883.
[3]	蒋伟, 盛文, 祁炜, 刘诗华. 大型相控阵雷达T/R组件维修决策问题综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 127-138.
[4]	刘海涛, 邵松世, 张志华. 基于任务的k/n(G)系统舰船备件需求预测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2189-2196.
[5]	王成, 许建新, 李连玉, 王红军, 张振明. 系统可靠度约束下的备件配置优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 279-284.
[6]	林名驰, 钟强晖, 李大伟. 不可修复产品的组合维修和备件供应策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(6): 1417-1423.
[7]	王亚东, 石全, 夏伟, 陈材. 基于超启发式算法的备件供应网络结构优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(3): 620-629.
[8]	周亮, 孟进, 李毅, 刘伟. 考虑关键性的多约束下辐射干扰对消装备随舰备件配置优化方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(2): 365-373.
[9]	王强, 贾希胜, 程中华, 王双川, 马云飞. 基于改进的局部保持投影的战时备件分类[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(1): 133-140.
[10]	杨建华, 韩梦莹. 视情维修条件下 k/N (G) 系统备件供需联合优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(9): 2148-2156.
[11]	逯程, 徐廷学, 王虹. 装备视情维修与备件库存联合优化决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(7): 1560-1567.
[12]	翟亚利, 张志华, 李广宇. 基于有限备件的战备完好性模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(5): 1043-1048.
[13]	冯蕴雯, 刘奎剑, 薛小锋, 刘雨昌. 基于Markov过程的冗余系统备件与冗余度联合优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(4): 919-928.
[14]	邵松世, 刘海涛, 张志华. 融合多源先验信息的舰船备件可靠性评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(12): 2905-2910.
[15]	王亚东, 石全, 张芳, 尤志锋, 夏伟. 基于动态进化算法的多阶段备件供应优化决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(11): 2514-2523.