基于本体的复杂产品维修工程案例知识表示及重用方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.02.25

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 557-568.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.02.25

基于本体的复杂产品维修工程案例知识表示及重用方法

王姝婷^1,², 刘晓冰^1,^2,*, 周军华³, 白朝阳^1,², 翟翔³

1. 大连理工大学制造管理信息化技术国家地方联合工程实验室, 辽宁大连 116024
2. 大连理工大学经济管理学院, 辽宁大连 116024
3. 北京电子工程总体研究所复杂产品智能制造系统技术国家实验室, 北京 100854

收稿日期:2020-11-26 出版日期:2022-02-18 发布日期:2022-02-24
通讯作者: 刘晓冰
作者简介:王姝婷(1996—), 女, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为项目型复杂装备产品知识建模与重用方法|刘晓冰(1956—), 男, 教授, 博士研究生导师, 博士, 主要研究方向为项目型驱动的复杂装备运营管理|周军华(1984—), 男, 高级工程师, 硕士, 主要研究方向为智能制造、多学科虚拟样机|白朝阳(1978—), 男, 副教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为面向产品全生命周期的知识管理、资源优化管理|翟翔(1989—), 男, 工程师, 硕士, 主要研究方向为知识管理数据工程描述及应用
基金资助:
国防基础科研计划前沿技术项目(JCKY2019205B012);复杂产品智能制造国家重点实验室开放基金

Ontology based knowledge representation and reuse method for complex product maintenance engineering cases

Shuting WANG^1,², Xiaobing LIU^1,^2,*, Junhua ZHOU³, Zhaoyang BAI^1,², Xiang ZHAI³

1. National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Manufacturing Management Information Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2. School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
3. National Laboratory of Intelligent Manufacturing System Technology for Complex Products, Beijing Institute of Electronic Engineering, Beijing 100854, China

Received:2020-11-26 Online:2022-02-18 Published:2022-02-24
Contact: Xiaobing LIU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

复杂产品是国民经济的基础, 针对复杂产品维修阶段知识表示困难、重用效果不佳等问题, 提出了复杂产品维修工程案例知识的表示及重用方法。首先, 基于对复杂产品维修领域知识类型及应用情境的分析, 设计了复杂产品维修工程案例知识体系结构, 构建了复杂产品维修工程案例四层本体模型, 实现了对维修阶段陈述性知识与过程性知识的独立表示。其次, 构建了复杂产品维修工程案例知识重用模型, 基于案例相似度与适应度匹配出适用于解决维修问题的历史案例, 实现维修知识的有效重用。最后, 以动车组的维修过程为例验证了所提方法的有效性, 可为复杂产品全生命周期工程案例的知识重用提供参考和借鉴。

关键词: 复杂产品维修工程案例, 本体, 案例表示, 知识重用

Abstract:

Complex product is the foundation of national economy. Aiming at the problems of difficult knowledge representation and poor reuse effect in the maintenance stage of complex product, the representation and reuse method of complex product maintenance engineering case knowledge is proposed. Firstly, based on the analysis of complex product maintenance domain knowledge types and application scenarios, a complex product maintenance engineering case knowledge architecture is designed, and a four layer ontology model of complex product maintenance engineering case is constructed to realize the independent representation of declarative knowledge and process knowledge in maintenance phase. Then, the knowledge reuse model of complex product maintenance engineering case is constructed. Based on the similarity and fitness, the historical cases suitable for solving maintenance problems are matched to realize the effective reuse of maintenance knowledge. Finally, the maintenance process of the electrical multiple unit is taken as an example to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. The method can provide reference for the knowledge reuse of complex product life cycle engineering cases.

Key words: maintenance engineering case for complex product (MECCP), ontology, case representation, knowledge reuse

中图分类号:

TP182
TP207

王姝婷, 刘晓冰, 周军华, 白朝阳, 翟翔. 基于本体的复杂产品维修工程案例知识表示及重用方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 557-568.

Shuting WANG, Xiaobing LIU, Junhua ZHOU, Zhaoyang BAI, Xiang ZHAI. Ontology based knowledge representation and reuse method for complex product maintenance engineering cases[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 557-568.

图/表 14

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表2

图10

图11

表3

参考文献 34

1	李伯虎, 柴旭东, 朱文海. 复杂产品集成制造系统技术[J]. 航空制造技术, 2002, (12): 17- 20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-833X.2002.12.012
	LI B H , CHAI X D , ZHU W H . Integrated manufacturing system technology for complex products[J]. Aviation Manufactu-ring Technology, 2002, (12): 17- 20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-833X.2002.12.012
2	史忠植. 知识发现[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2011.
	SHI Z Z . Knowledge discovery[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2011.
3	赵佳宝, 谈晓洁, 焦小澄, 等. 基于本体的工业综合预报警系统设计与实现[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32 (10): 2145- 2150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2010.10.28
	ZHAO J B , TAN X J , JIAO X C , et al. Design and implementation of an ontology based industrial integrated warning system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32 (10): 2145- 2150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2010.10.28
4	LIN H K , HARDING J A . A manufacturing system engineering ontology model on the semantic web for inter-enterprise collaboration[J]. Computers in Industry, 2007, 58 (5): 428- 437. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.015
5	LIN L F , ZHANG W Y , LOU Y C , et al. Developing manufacturing ontologies for knowledge reuse in distributed manufactu-ring environment[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2011, 49 (2): 343- 359. doi: 10.1080/00207540903349021
6	ALALI V, LEAKE D. CBR meets big data: a case study of large-scale adaptation rule generation[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, 2015.
7	PENG G Z , WANG H W , ZHANG H M , et al. A collaborative system for capturing and reusing in-context design knowledge with an integrated representation model[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2017, 33, 314- 329. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2016.12.007
8	COSTA C A , LUCIANO M A , LIMA C P , et al. Assessment of a product range model concept to support design reuse using rule based systems and case based reasoning[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2012, 26 (2): 292- 305. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2011.11.001
9	WU Z Y , LIU H T , GOH M . Knowledge recommender system for complex product development using ontology and vector space model[J]. Concurrent Engineering, 2019, 27 (4): 347- 360. doi: 10.1177/1063293X19888263
10	LI R , ZHANG H Z , QIN S F , et al. Customization design method for complex product systems based on a meta-model[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 11 (10): 1- 16.
11	PENG J , LI W Q , WANG M , et al. Knowledge configuration model for fast derivation design of electronic equipment and its implementation[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 206, 106360. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106360
12	LI Z , ZHOU X , WANG W M , et al. An ontology-based product design framework for manufacturability verification and know-ledge reuse[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 12 (9): 2121- 2135.
13	EL SOURI M , GAO J , SIMMONDS C . Integrating manufacturing knowledge with design process to improve quality in the aerospace industry[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2019, 84, 374- 379. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.179
14	CHHIM P , CHINNAM R B , SADAWI N . Product design and manufacturing process based ontology for manufacturing knowledge reuse[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2019, 30, 905- 916. doi: 10.1007/s10845-016-1290-2
15	DENDANI H N , KHADIR M T . A fault diagnosis application based on a combination case-based reasoning and ontology approach[J]. International Journal of Knowledge Based & Intelligent Engineering Systems, 2013, 17 (4): 305- 317.
16	DENDANI N, KHADIR M, GUESSOUM S, et al. Use a domain ontology to develop knowledge intensive CBR systems for fault diagnosis[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and E-Services, 2012.
17	EBRAHIMIPOUR V , REZAIE K , SHOKRAVI S . Erratum to "an ontology approach to support FMEA studies"[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37 (7): 5532- 5532. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.066
18	EBRAHIMIPOUR V , YACOUT S . Ontology-based schema to support maintenance knowledge representation with a case study of a pneumatic valve[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems Man & Cybernetics Systems, 2015, 45 (4): 702- 712.
19	ZHU J , ONG S K , NEE A Y C . An authorable context-aware augmented reality system to assist the maintenance technicians[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 66 (9-12): 1699- 1714.
20	ONG S K , ZHU J . A novel maintenance system for equipment serviceability improvement[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 62 (1): 39- 42. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.091
21	孙雪, 黄志球, 沈国华, 等. 基于本体和BN的无人车行为决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (2): 452- 465.
	SUN X , HUANG Z Q , SHEN G H , et al. Decision making method of unmanned vehicle behavior based on ontology and BN[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (2): 452- 465.
22	ANJUM N , HARDING J , YOUNG R , et al. Verification of knowledge shared across design and manufacture using a foundation ontology[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51 (21-22): 6534- 6552.
23	LI H , SUN J . Hybridizing principles of the electre method with case-based reasoning for data mining: electre-CBR-Ⅰ and electre-CBR-Ⅱ[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197 (1): 214- 224. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.024
24	万姗, 李东波, 何非, 等. 数控机床维护服务过程中的知识重用[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24 (9): 2254- 2269.
	WAN S , LI D B , HE F , et al. Knowledge reuse in NC machine tool maintenance service[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing System, 2018, 24 (9): 2254- 2269.
25	SHAKER E A , MOGAMMEDE B . A fuzzy-ontology-oriented case-based reasoning framework for semantic diabetes diagnosis science direct[J]. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2015, 65 (3): 179- 208. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.08.003
26	JIANG X Y , WANG S , WANG J , et al. A decision method for construction safety risk management based on ontology and improved CBR: example of a subway project[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17 (11): 2304- 2312.
27	MEHLA S , JAIN S . An ontology supported hybrid approach for recommendation in emergency situations[J]. Annals of Telecommunications, 2020, 75, 421- 435. doi: 10.1007/s12243-020-00786-z
28	AMAILEF K , LU J . Ontology-supported case-based reasoning approach for intelligent m-Government emergency response services[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 55 (1): 79- 97. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.034
29	HE Y , HAO C P , WANG Y L , et al. An ontology-based method of knowledge modelling for remanufacturing process planning[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 258, 120952. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120952
30	GAO J J, DENG G S. The research of applying domain ontology to case-based reasoning system[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005, 2: 1113-1117.
31	张建华, 李方方, 叶建文. 基于领域本体与CBR的案例知识供需匹配研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39 (10): 144- 150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2020.10.022
	ZHANG J H , LI F F , YE J W . Research on case knowledge supply and demand matching based on domain ontology and CBR[J]. Journal of Information, 2020, 39 (10): 144- 150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2020.10.022
32	GILBOA I , SCHMEIDLER D . Case-based decision theory[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110 (3): 605- 639. doi: 10.2307/2946694
33	FERNANDEZ L M , GOMEZ P A , SUAREZ F M C . Methodological guidelines for reusing general ontologies[J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2013, 86 (4): 242- 275.
34	GÓMEZ-PÉREZ A , BENJAMINS V R . Applications of onto-logies and problem-solving methods[J]. AI Magazine, 1999, 20, 119- 122.

关系	Relations
整体与局部	is-part-of
子集	is-a
属性	is-attribute-of
地点	in-place
时间	at-time
有影响	has-effect
伴随	follows
使用	uses
实施	implements
⋮	⋮

符号	含义
MECCP_t	目标案例
MECCP_n	源案例
Sim_k(B_t, B_n)	目标案例与源案例第k个分支的相似度
M_g	某一分支的第g层
C_{B_{(t, n)}}^M_g	目标分支与源分支中第g层共享的概念数
C_{B_t}^M_g	目标案例中需计算相似度的某一分支第g层中包含的概念数
C_{B_n}^M_g	源案例中需进行相似度计算的某一分支第g层中包含的概念数
ω_g	某一分支的第g层在进行相似度计算时的权重
N_{B_t}^M	目标案例中需进行相似度计算的某一分支中包含的层数
N_{B_n}^M	源案例中需进行相似度计算的某一分支中包含的层数
φ_k	第k个分支计算相似度时的权重
DoSim(D_t, D_n)	目标案例与源案例领域本体相似度

属性	转速	温度	电压	异常振动	发生时间	方案
MECCP_t	4 250	69	18.6	是	[5, 8]	-
MECCP₁	5 100	69	12.7	是	[4, 8]	方案1
MECCP₂	5 800	42	15.7	是	[5, 7]	方案2
MECCP₃	4 500	72	10.1	是	[4, 6]	方案3
MECCP₄	4 700	63	16.1	是	[4, 9]	方案4
权重	0.15	0.20	0.35	0.10	0.20	-

[1]	罗弋洋, 赵青松, 李华超, 李勇, 孙建彬. 武器装备运用知识框架及建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 841-849.
[2]	庞维建, 李辉, 黄谦, 李朋, 马贤明. 基于本体的无人系统任务规划研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 908-920.
[3]	孙雪, 黄志球, 沈国华, 王金永, 徐恒. 基于本体和BN的无人车行为决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(2): 452-465.
[4]	何红悦, 王智学, 梁豪默, 王庆龙. 基于本体的体系使命建模及分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(9): 1973-1978.
[5]	程恺, 陈刚, 尹成祥, 康睿智, 康兴挡. 作战行动序列核心本体建模及其推理方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(4): 805-814.
[6]	孙煜飞, 马良荔, 吕闽晖, 覃基伟. 基于改进协同训练的本体映射方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(2): 459-464.
[7]	麦强, 王宁, 安实, 王钊. 基于本体语义建模的航天工程风险管理知识库[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(10): 2331-2337.
[8]	苏正炼, 严骏, 陈海松, 曾拥华. 基于本体的装备故障知识库构建[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(9): 2067-2072.
[9]	李亢, 李新明, 刘东. 基于语义元模型的装备体系结构建模方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(11): 2503-2512.
[10]	谭贤四, 朱刚, 王红, 毕红葵, 高婷. 基于IDEAS的联合论证元模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(1): 85-92.
[11]	胡博, 王智学, 董庆超. 基于OWL的上下文感知建模与推理方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(10): 2163-2168.
[12]	刘娟,唐苏妍,李群,王维平. 航迹规划领域本体的构建与应用[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(6): 1258-1262.
[13]	刘忠，钱猛，黄金才，张维明. 基于语义推理的作战计划验证方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(5): 988-993.
[14]	钱猛，刘忠，姚莉，张维明. 作战计划的本体建模研究[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(5): 994-1000.
[15]	冯磊,全军,胡记文,查亚兵. 任务型CGF组织本体建模[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(11): 2389-2393.

基于本体的复杂产品维修工程案例知识表示及重用方法

Ontology based knowledge representation and reuse method for complex product maintenance engineering cases

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价