基于近场散射模型的超低空目标雷达回波模拟

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.01.18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近区超低空目标具有更为复杂的电磁散射机理, 需要建立更为精细灵活的回波模型。基于改进的物理光学与等效电磁流方法建立了目标的近场散射模型, 结合面元模型与“四路径”模型提出环境与多径的近区散射计算方法。利用建立的电磁模型, 以雷达导引头探测近区超低空目标为应用背景, 建立了雷达回波信号模型。验证了近场电磁模型的有效性, 仿真分析了信号带宽以及雷达与目标不同相对运动状态对回波信号的影响。仿真结果表明, 回波模型较好地表现了复杂场景的各种散射机理, 对于探索近区超低空目标回波的特征与规律具有理论意义与实用价值。

关键词: 超低空, 近场, 散射模型, 雷达回波

Abstract:

The electromagnetic scattering mechanism of ultra-low altitude target in near zone is more complex, so it is necessary to establish a more accurate and flexible echo model. Based on the improved physical optics and method equivalent current, the target near-field scattering model is established. Combined with the facet model and "four path" model, the evaluated methods of near zone scattering contributions for environment and multipath are proposed. Using the proposed electromagnetic model, the radar echo signal model is established with the radar seeker detecting the ultra-low altitude target in the near zone as the background of the scene. The validity of the near-field electromagnetic model is verified, and the signal bandwidth and the influence of the relative motion state between the radar and the target on the echo signal are simulated and analyzed. Simulation results show that the echo model better represents various scattering mechanisms in complex scenes, and has theoretical significance and practical value for exploring the characteristics and laws of ultra-low altitude targets in the near zone.

Key words: ultra-low altitude, near field, scattering model, radar echo

中图分类号:

TN011

王童, 童创明, 王宜进, 刘杰. 基于近场散射模型的超低空目标雷达回波模拟[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 139-145.

Tong WANG, Chuangming TONG, Yijin WANG, Jie LIU. Radar echo simulation of ultra-low altitude target based on near-field scattering model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 139-145.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 31

1	YANG Y , FENG D J , WANG X S , et al. Effects of K distributed sea clutter and multipath on radar detection of low altitude sea surface targets[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2014, 8 (7): 757- 766.
2	TIAN G L , TONG C M , LIU H , et al. Anti-multipath interference method of semi-active seek[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 21 (8): 7507- 7511.
3	梁子长, 王晓冰, 魏飞鸣, 等. 近场电磁散射特点及其对建模要求[J]. 电波科学学报, 2020, 35 (1): 141- 148.
	LIANG Z C , WANG X B , WEI F M , et al. Characteristics and modeling requirements for the near-field electromagnetic scattering[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2020, 35 (1): 141- 148.
4	GUO G B , GUO L X . SBR method for near-field scattering of an electrically large complex target illuminated by d ipole sources[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6, 78710- 78718. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885148
5	LEGAULT S R . Refining physical optics for near-field computations[J]. Electronics Letters, 2004, 40 (1): 71- 72. doi: 10.1049/el:20040001
6	SUI M , XU X J . A novel procedure for high resolution radar signature prediction of near field targets[J]. IEEE Trans.on Antennas and Propagation, 2010, 58 (9): 2981- 2993. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2010.2052552
7	CORUCC I L , GIUSTI E , MARTORELLA M , et al. Near field physical optics modelling for concealed weapon detection[J]. IEEE Trans.on Antennas and Propagation, 2012, 60 (12): 6052- 6057. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2012.2210017
8	王晓冰, 吴振森, 梁子长, 等. 超低空目标与粗糙面复合散射的波束追踪算法[J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61 (24): 244105. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.244105
	WANG X B , WU Z S , LIANG Z C , et al. Beam-tracking algorithm for composite scattering between low altitude targets and rough surface[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61 (24): 244105. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.244105
9	王晓冰, 吴振森, 张元, 等. 海环境近区电磁散射特性模拟测试及统计分析[J]. 电波科学学报, 2013, 28 (1): 28- 32.
	WANG X B , WU Z S , ZHANG Y , et al. Electromagnetic backward scattering measurements of rough sea surface i n near field[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2013, 28 (1): 28- 32.
10	程志华, 谢拥军, 樊君. 复杂目标的太赫兹波近场RCS快速计算[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2014, 36 (8): 1999- 2004.
	CHENG Z H , XIE Y J , FAN J . Fast computation of near field RCS of complex objects in terahertz band[J]. Journal of Elec tronics and Information Technology, 2014, 36 (8): 1999- 2004.
11	CHEN B , TONG C M . Modified physical optics algorithm for near field scattering[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2018, 27 (11): 114102. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/11/114102
12	CHEN B , TON G C M . Near-field scattering evaluation based on improved PO and EECs[J]. Electronics Letters, 2019, 55 (4): 180- 182. doi: 10.1049/el.2018.7884
13	CHEN B , TONG C M . Near-field scattering prediction based on refined time-domain high-frequency method[J]. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2019, 18 (6): 1194- 1198. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2019.2911951
14	LI X M , LI J J , GAO Q , et al. A hybrid method of solving near-zone composite electromagnetic scattering from targets and underlying rough surface[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29 (2): 024202. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab5ef9
15	经文, 赵宇姣, 江舸, 等. 基于物理光学法的近场多入多出雷达成像模拟[J]. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报, 2019, 17 (6): 981- 987.
	JING W , ZHAO Y J , JIANG G , et al. Near-field MIMO radar imaging simulation based on physical optics method[J]. Journal of Terahertz Science and Electronic Information Technology, 2019, 17 (6): 981- 987.
16	LIU E X, CAO L, YANG L. Study on electromagnetic simulation methodology for sea clutter based on FDTD model[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems, 2017: 2387-2394.
17	DOWD B W , RODOLFO E D . FDTD simulation of very large domains applied to radar propagation over the ocean[J]. IEEE Trans.on Antennas and Propagation, 2018, 66 (10): 5333- 5348. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2018.2852141
18	PENG P , GUO L X , SUN H L . The echo modelling and simulation of the semi-active radar seeker against a sea skimming target[J]. Journal of Computer and Communications, 2018, 6 (12): 74- 79. doi: 10.4236/jcc.2018.612007
19	TANG B , HAO B , HUANG L , et al. Simulation of the Doppler echoes from wind turbine based on scattered electric field calculation[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2019, 13 (11): 2055- 2062.
20	YANG P J , WU R , REN X C , et al. Doppler spectra of electromagnetic wave scattered from an object flying above time-varying nonlinear sea surfaces[J]. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, 2019, 33 (16): 2175- 2198. doi: 10.1080/09205071.2019.1674191
21	LI J X , ZHANG M , ZHAO Y , et al. Efficient numerical full-polarized facet-based model for EM scattering from rough sea surface within a wide frequency range[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11 (1): 75. doi: 10.3390/rs11010075
22	KARAEV V , TITCHENKO Y , PANFILOVA M , et al. The Doppler spectrum of the microwave radar signal backscattered from the sea surface in terms of the modified Bragg scattering model[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 58 (1): 193- 202.
23	TOPORKOV J V, SLETTEN M A. Investigation of Doppler spectra of sea backscatter through large-scale Monte Carlo simulations: direct numerical solution and approxim ate models[C]//Proc. of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2018: 41-44.
24	ZHAO Y , ZHANG M , CHEN H , et al. Radar scattering from the composite ship-ocean scene: Doppler spectrum analysis based on the motion of six degrees of freedom[J]. IEEE Trans.on Antennas and Propagation, 2014, 62 (8): 4341- 4347. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2014.2322893
25	PENG P , GUO L X . A facet-based simulation of the multipath effect on the EM scattering and Doppler spectrum of a low-flying target at maritime scene[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, 52 (11): 7120- 7129.
26	DI M G , IODICE A , POREH D , et al. Pol-SARAS: a fully polari-metric SAR raw signal simulator for extended soil surfaces[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 56 (4): 2233- 2247.
27	DELLAGLIO D A , DI M G , IODICE A , et al. A unified formulation of SAR raw signals from extended scenes for all acquisition modes with application to simulation[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56 (8): 4956- 4967. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2844094
28	WANG T , TONG C M . An analytical model of double scattering for SAR imaging of urban structures[J]. Optik, 2018, 171, 484- 491. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.06.084
29	LEI S L , QIU X L , ZHANG Y T , et al. Analysis of the multipath scattering effects in high-resolution SAR images[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2019, 17 (4): 616- 620.
30	CÔTÉ F. Simulation de section efficace radar sur une trajectoire[D]. Quebec: Laval University, 2007.
31	DE R R D, ULABY F T. A modified physical optics model of the rough surface reflection coefficient[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1996: 1772-1775.

[1]	杨兴家, 段克清, 李想, 祁炜. 无人机集群协同探测距离解模糊方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 480-489.
[2]	张玉廷, 肖淼, 张亮, 周怀安, 吕争. 基于近场扫描的移动通信卫星EMC性能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(9): 1897-1902.
[3]	李玮, 邓维波, 杨强, MARCO Donald Migliore. 阵列失效单元非凸压缩感知平面近场快速诊断方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(6): 1173-1179.
[4]	冯德军, 谢前朋, 王俊杰, 刘蕾. 对雷达回波的无源电磁调控技术及其发展[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(6): 1236-1241.
[5]	党娇娇, 罗沅, 宋祖勋, 胡楚锋, 王保平. 基于耦合目标的近场双站散射测试方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(4): 759-764.
[6]	马晓宇, 赵季中, 卢锦, 郭航. 基于小波变换的雷达目标回波信号提取算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(1): 50-57.
[7]	赵宇姣, 成彬彬, 刘杰, 姜济群, 喻洋. 基于毫米波近场成像的二维稀疏面阵结构[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(9): 1926-1930.
[8]	朱荣强, 周剑雄, 付强. 近场单发多收合成孔径雷达成像的频域算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(4): 756-761.
[9]	冯阳, 廖桂生, 许京伟. 机载雷达超低空多径目标稳健STAP方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(7): 1464-1470.
[10]	肖宇, 郑桂妹, 宫健. 基于单脉冲复角测量减小天线指向波动的方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(4): 721-725.
[11]	张武才, 潘明海, 陈诗弘. 基于LFM子脉冲的宽带雷达目标回波模拟方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(4): 768-774.
[12]	于新源, 许波, 熊坤, 杜海. 箔条云团雷达回波建模与仿真[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(1): 79-85.
[13]	刘建成, 赵宏志, 全厚德, 崔佩璋, 唐友喜, 孙慧贤. 结合天线互耦分析的同车电台射频干扰对消[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(11): 2598-2605.
[14]	段崇雯, 胡卫东, 杜小勇. 海面目标雷达回波中多径延迟的概率模型[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(6): 1140-1145.
[15]	马静，金从军，费锦东，陈东. 面向应用的射频仿真系统近场效应误差修正[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(8): 1901-1906.