基于多观测向量块稀疏的MIMO雷达非理想正交波形成像

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.12.10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于稀疏恢复的多输入多输出(multiple input multiple output, MIMO)雷达波形分离方法,能够代替匹配滤波,提高MIMO雷达非理想正交波形分离效果,对目标高分辨成像。但由于目标像稀疏性较弱,多观测向量(multiple measurement vector, MMV)稀疏恢复算法的效果有限。通过调整感知矩阵发掘目标像的块稀疏性,提出了一种基于块稀疏的MMV稀疏重构算法来提高成像质量。首先采用改进的复合三角函数(improved composite trigonometric function, ICTF)作为平滑函数近似l₀范数,然后将其扩展到基于块稀疏的MMV模型,最后通过自适应调整正则化参数提升算法稳健性。通过实验验证了该算法在不同稀疏度、不同信噪比下的重构性能,仿真分析了其应用于MIMO雷达对多散射点目标模型的成像效果。仿真结果表明,所提算法能够更好地提高成像质量。

关键词: 多输入多输出成像, 多观测向量, 块稀疏, 改进复合三角函数, 稳健性

Abstract:

The multiple input multiple output (MIMO) radar waveform separation method based on the sparse recovery can improve the quality of non-ideal orthogonal waveform separation of MIMO radar and obtain high resolution images, which can replace the matched filter. However, due to the weak sparseness of the target image, the effect of the multiple measure ment vector (MMV) sparse recovery algorithm is limited. By adjusting the perceptual matrix to explore the block sparsity of the target image, a block sparse based on MMV sparse reconstruction algorithm is proposed to improve the image quality. Firstly, the improved composite trigonometric function (ICTF) is used as a smoothing function to approximate the l₀ norm. Then, it is extended to the MMV model based on block sparse. Finally, the robustness of the algorithm is improved by the adaptive adjustment of regularization parameters. The reconstruction performance of the algorithm under different sparseness and signal to noise ratio (SNR) is verified by experiments. The imaging effect of the MIMO radar on the multiple-scattering points target model is analyzed. The simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can improve the imaging quality.

Key words: multiple input multiple output (MIMO) imaging, multiple measurement vector (MMV), block sparse, improved composite trigonometric function (ICTF), robustness

中图分类号:

TN957.51

陈桥, 童宁宁, 胡晓伟, 丁姗姗. 基于多观测向量块稀疏的MIMO雷达非理想正交波形成像[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(12): 2747-2754.

Qiao CHEN, Ningning TONG, Xiaowei HU, Shanshan DING. Non-ideal orthogonal waveforms imaging of MIMO radar based on multiple measurement vector block sparse algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(12): 2747-2754.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表1

图11

参考文献 30

1	朱宇涛, 郁文贤, 粟毅. 一种基于MIMO技术的ISAR成像方法[J]. 电子学报, 2009, 37 (9): 1885- 1894.
	ZHU Y T , YU W X , SU Y . An ISAR image method based on MIMO technolodgy[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2009, 37 (9): 1885- 1894.
2	MA C Z , YEO T S , TAN C S , et al. Three-dimensional imaging of targets using colocated MIMO radar[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49 (8): 3009- 3021. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2119321
3	HU X W , GUO Y D , GE Q C , et al. Fast SL0 algorithm for 3D imaging using bistatic MIMO radar[J]. IET Signal Processing, 2018, 12 (8): 1017- 1022. doi: 10.1049/iet-spr.2017.0376
4	CHENG S J , WANG W Q , SO H C . MIMO radar OFDM chirp waveform diversity design with sparse modeling and joint optimization[J]. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 2017, 28, 237- 249. doi: 10.1007/s11045-015-0340-9
5	MENG C Z , XU J , XIA X G , et al. MIMO-SAR waveform separation based on inter-pulse phase modulation and range-Doppler decouple filtering[J]. Electronics Letters, 2013, 49 (6): 420- 422. doi: 10.1049/el.2013.0016
6	JIAO Z K , DING C B , LIANG X D , et al. Sparse Bayesian learning based three-dimensional imaging algorithm for off-grid air targets in MIMO radar array[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10 (3): 369. doi: 10.3390/rs10030369
7	HUANG P , LI X , WANG H . Tensor-based match pursuit algorithm for MIMO radar imaging[J]. Radio Engineering, 2018, 27 (2): 580- 586.
8	MA C Z , YEO T S , NG B P . Multiple input multiple output radar imaging based on multidimensional linear equations and sparse signal recovery[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2017, 12 (1): 3- 10.
9	HU X W , TONG N N , GUO Y D , et al. MIMO radar 3-D imaging based on multi-dimensional sparse recovery and signal support prior information[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018, 18 (8): 3152- 3162. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2810705
10	邹博, 董臻, 梁甸农. 多发多收SAR编码正交信号设计及性能分析[J]. 中国科学:信息科学, 2011, 41 (6): 761- 776.
	ZOU B , DONG Z , LIANG D N . Design and performance analysis of orthogonal coding signal in MIMO-SAR[J]. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2011, 41 (6): 761- 776.
11	KRIEGER G . MIMO-SAR: opportunities and pitfalls[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 52 (5): 2628- 2645.
12	KIM J H , YOUNIS M , MOREIRA A , et al. A novel OFDM chirp waveform scheme for use of multiple transmitters in SAR[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2012, 10 (3): 568- 572.
13	WANG W Q . MIMO SAR OFDM chirp waveform diversity design with random matrix modulation[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 53 (3): 1615- 1625.
14	胡晓伟.基于稀疏理论的MIMO雷达运动目标三维成像方法研究[D].西安:空军工程大学, 2016.
	HU X W. Research on MIMO radar moving target 3D imaging method based on compression sensing[D]. Xi'an: Air Force Engineering University, 2016.
15	WANG Y C, GUO Y D, HU X W, et al.MIMO radar nonideal orthogonal waveforms separation via compressive sensing[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 2018.
16	HE X Y , TONG N N , HU X W , et al. High-resolution ISAR imaging of fast rotating targets based on pattern-coupled Bayesian strategy for multiple measurement vectors[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2019, 93, 151- 159. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2019.07.001
17	XIANG L , LI S D , YANG J , et al. A fast decoupled ISAR high-resolution imaging method using structural sparse information under low SNR[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (3): 492- 503. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.03.07
18	HE X Y , TONG N N , HU X W , et al. High-resolution ISAR imaging based on two-dimensional group sparse recovery[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2017, 12 (1): 82- 86.
19	HE X Y , TONG N N , HU X . Superresolution radar imaging based on fast inverse-free sparse Bayesian learning for multiple measurement vectors[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2018, 12 (1): 015013.
20	FENG J J , ZHANG G . ISAR imaging based on iterative reweighted L_p block sparse reconstruction algorithm[J]. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 2016, 48, 155- 162. doi: 10.2528/PIERM16041501
21	冯俊杰, 张弓. 多测量向量块稀疏信号重构ISAR成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (9): 1959- 1964.
	FENG J J , ZHANG G . Multiple measurement vectors block sparse signal recovery ISAR imaging algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (9): 1959- 1964.
22	童宁宁, 赵小茹, 丁姗姗, 等. 采用复合三角函数实现MIMO雷达单快拍成像的平滑l₀范数改进算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2017, 39 (12): 2803- 2810.
	TONG N N , ZHAO X R , DING S S , et al. Improved smoothed l₀ norm algorithm for MIMO radar signal snapshot imaging via composite trigonometric function[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2017, 39 (12): 2803- 2810.
23	王峰, 向新, 易克初, 等. L0范数平滑逼近的稳健求解算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37 (10): 2377- 2382.
	WANG F , XIANG X , YI K C , et al. Robust computational methods for smoothed L0 approximation[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2015, 37 (10): 2377- 2382.
24	HANSEN P C , O'LEARY D P . The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1993, 14 (6): 1487- 1503. doi: 10.1137/0914086
25	HE X Y , TONG N N , HU X W . Two-dimension gradient projection method for sparse matrix reconstruction[J]. Electronic Letters, 2016, 52 (17): 1493- 1495. doi: 10.1049/el.2016.0912
26	MA C Z , YEO T S , ZHAO Y B , et al. MIMO radar 3D imaging based on combined amplitude and total variation cost function with sequential order one negative exponential form[J]. IEEE Trans.on Image Processing, 2014, 23 (5): 2168- 2183.
27	HE X Y , TONG N N , HU X W . High-resolution ISAR imaging via MMV-bsaed block-sparse signal recovery[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2018, 13 (2): 208- 212.
28	CHEN Z F , MOLINA R , KATSAGGELOS A K . Robust recovery of temporally smooth signals from under-determined multiple measurements[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2015, 63 (7): 1779- 1791. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2403277
29	胡晓伟, 童宁宁, 何兴宇, 等. 基于Kronecder压缩感知的宽带MIMO雷达高分辨三维成像[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38 (6): 1475- 1481.
	HU X W , TONG N N , HE X Y , et al. High-resolution 3D imaging via wideband MIMO radar based on Kronecker compressive sensing[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2016, 38 (6): 1475- 1481.
30	HU X W , TONG N N , ZHANG Y S , et al. Multiple-input-multiple-output radar super-resolution 3D imaging based on a dimension-reduction Compressive Sensing[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2016, 10 (4): 757- 764.

算法	姿态1		姿态2
算法	IC	IE	IC	IE
MF	2.280 7	8.978 9	2.186 2	9.072 1
MSL0	10.354 5	7.222 7	8.934 7	7.491 2
MBSSL0	10.594 2	7.120 2	9.142 4	7.392 4
MBICTF	10.654 8	7.045 4	9.293 9	7.300 6

[1]	李浩洋, 向建军, 彭芳, 王帅, 李志军. 基于粒子群优化的波束空间广义旁瓣相消算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3037-3045.
[2]	付蓉, 黄天耀, 刘一民. 基于深度学习的捷变相参雷达1-Bit块稀疏重构[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 70-75.
[3]	李冬霞, 陈秋雨, 王磊, 刘海涛. 基于BSBL-BO算法的DME脉冲干扰抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2649-2656.
[4]	蒲涛, 童宁宁, 冯为可, 房亮, 高晓阳. 基于块稀疏矩阵恢复的MIMO雷达扩展目标高分辨成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(3): 647-655.
[5]	张永顺, 朱卫纲, 贾鑫, 王满喜. 基于块稀疏贝叶斯学习的直扩通信窄带干扰检测与参数估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(4): 889-897.
[6]	纪元法, 朱亮亮, 孙希延, 严素清. 差分进化算法结合正则化解算病态方程[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(7): 1573-1577.
[7]	何兴宇, 童宁宁, 胡晓伟, 冯为可. 基于多观测向量序列降采样恢复的稀疏矩阵重构[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(2): 250-254.
[8]	冯俊杰, 张弓. 多测量向量块稀疏信号重构ISAR成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(9): 1959-1964.
[9]	张素玲, 陈胜垚, 席峰, 刘中. 多带正交压缩采样雷达回波信号的快速重构[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(9): 1971-1978.
[10]	陈鹏, 孟晨, 王成, 杨森. 基于空间投影的高冗余Gabor框架采样系统信号重构方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(2): 244-252.
[11]	司菁菁, 候肖兰, 程银波. 基于块剪枝多路径匹配追踪的多信号联合重构[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(9): 1993-1999.
[12]	陈鹏, 王成, 孟晨. 基于约束等距的块稀疏压缩采样匹配追踪算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(2): 239-245.
[13]	刘也, 余安喜, 张增辉, 朱炬波, 梁甸农. 空间目标跟踪的融合系统设计[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(9): 1941-1947.
[14]	周彦，李建勋. 无线传感器网络中分布式量化航迹稳健融合[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(3): 643-649.
[15]	周争光，廖桂生，朱圣棋. 稳健的多通道SAR特征投影杂波抑制算法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(5): 941-945.