海况影响下的分布式海战补给路径规划方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

传统的舰船伴随补给方式路径规划较为简单,且没有考虑风浪等海况因素的影响,已无法满足现在分布式杀伤海战概念及其反制措施的要求。为此,建立了多编队海上补给路径规划模型,综合考虑了复杂海况及补给时间窗对舰船补给的影响。为了求解规划模型,提出了基于时长步进的路径评估算法,首先利用海洋气象预报信息计算各时间步长的舰船阻力,随后估算不同候选路径的航行时间、等待时间及作业时间,从而比较得到最优路径。仿真实验证明了所提算法的优越性,能够为分布式海战补给提供决策支持。

关键词: 分布式海战, 路径规划, 海上补给, 海况, 时间窗

Abstract:

Under the traditional ship accompanying replenishment method, the path planning is relatively simple and does not consider the influence of the sea conditions such as wind and waves, which is unable to meet the requirements of the current distributed lethality naval warfare concept and its countermeasures. To this end, a multi-fleet underway replenishment path planning model is established, which comprehensively considered the impact of the complex sea conditions and replenishment time windows on ship replenishment. In order to solve the planning model, a path evaluation algorithm based on time step is proposed. Firstly, the marine resistance is used to calculate the ship resistance at each time step by using the marine meterologal forecast information. Then estimate the sailing time, waiting time and operation time of different candidate routes, so as to compare and get the optimal path. Simulation experiments prove that the superiority of the proposed algorithm and can provide decision support for distributed naval warfare replenishment.

Key words: distributed naval warfare, path planning, underway replenishment, sea condition, time window

中图分类号:

E953

张泉先, 曾斌, 李厚朴. 海况影响下的分布式海战补给路径规划方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(10): 2312-2319.

Quanxian ZHANG, Bin ZENG, Houpu LI. Underway replenishment path planning method for distributed naval warfare under the influence of sea conditions[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(10): 2312-2319.

图/表 13

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

表4

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 17

1	ROWDEN T , GUMATAOTAO P , FANTA P . Distributed lethality[J]. Proceedings Magazine, 2015, 141 (1): 18- 23.
2	黄峻松. 分布式杀伤是海上战争形态的发展趋势[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36 (4): 62- 68.
	HUANG J S . Distributed lethality is an important factor in the development of maritime warfare[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2018, 36 (4): 62- 68.
3	王利伟. 国外海军海上补给现状和发展趋势[J]. 船电技术, 2017, 37 (2): 58- 62.
	WANG L W . Reviews on foreign naval replenishment at sea[J]. Marine Electric & Electronic Engineering, 2017, 37 (2): 58- 62.
4	邓薇.舰船海上液货补给方案优化方法研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2016.
	DENG W. Research on optimization method about liquid cargo replenishment scheme at sea[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2016.
5	李嘉宁, 杨强, 宋杨, 等. 舰船海上补给的航态决策方法研究[J]. 中国造船, 2019, 60 (1): 202- 211.
	LI J N , YANG Q , SONG Y , et al. Research on the decision-making method of ship's maritime replenishment[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2019, 60 (1): 202- 211.
6	JI Z N, TAO L M, LYU W. Modelling and simulation of vessel alongside replenishment motion response based on sea conditions analysis[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Mechanical, Material and Aerospace Engineering, 2017.
7	CHEN X , ZHU R C , YANG Y T . Time-domain analysis of motion responses of side-by-side vessels during offshore installations and underway replenishment[J]. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2018, 28 (1): 19- 30. doi: 10.17736/ijope.2018.jc711
8	DONG P , YU P , QIN F R . Study on optimization algorithm of underway replenishment routine project for naval battle group[J]. International Journal of Simulation-Systems, Science & Technology, 2016, 17 (27): 12.1- 12.6. doi: 10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.27.12
9	DUNN J S. Scheduling underway replenishment as a generalized orienteering problem[D]. California: Naval Postgraduate School, 1992.
10	周晓光, 赵仁厚, 王述运, 等. 航母编队补给船海上补给航路规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36 (9): 1755- 1760. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2014.09.14
	ZHOU X G , ZHAO R H , WANG S Y , et al. Research on underway replenishment path planning for supply ship in carrier battle group[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36 (9): 1755- 1760. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2014.09.14
11	PERERA L P , SOARES C G . Weather routing and safe ship handling in the future of shipping[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 130, 684- 695. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.09.007
12	VETTOR R , SOARES C G . Development of a ship weather routing system[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 123, 1- 14. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.06.035
13	LLEBERG K J J. Weather routing of supply vessels in the north sea-solving the supply vessel weather routing problem[D]. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2015.
14	BOLSTAD H M, BENJAMIN M C A. Optimization and simulation of a maritime transportation system with transshipments at sea[D]. Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2017.
15	BOOM V D H, HOUT V D I, FLIKKEMA M. Speed-power performance of ships during trials and in service[C]//Proc.of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 2008.
16	International Towing Tank Conference. ITTC-recommended procedures and guidelines speed, speed and power trials, part 2 analysis of speed/power trial data[C]//Proc.of the International Towing Tank Conference, 2012.
17	FOSSEN T I . Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control[M]. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

编号	坐标		补给作业时间O/h	安全补给浪高H/m	补给时限L/h
编号	经度/(°E)	纬度/(°N)	补给作业时间O/h	安全补给浪高H/m	补给时限L/h
0	115.515 1	13.955 6	-	-	-
1	111.728 8	14.874 1	3	4	40
2	112.015 2	13.823 6	3	4	65
3	111.243 7	13.845 2	3	4	30
4	112.887 3	14.165 2	3	4	80
5	111.608 6	12.333 9	3	4	70
6	112.572 6	13.088 7	3	4	50

P_c/%	时间补偿/h
P_c＞90	0.9
80＜P_c≤90	0.8
70＜P_c≤80	0.7
60＜P_c≤70	0.6

V/(m/s)	R_C/(×10³N)	P=VR_C/kw
0.514 4	13.518 0	6.954 3
1.028 9	26.523 0	27.289 2
1.543 3	39.297 0	60.648 4
2.057 8	51.896 0	106.790 4
2.572 2	64.380 0	165.599 6
3.086 7	76.746 0	236.889 3
3.601 1	88.994 0	320.477 3
4.115 6	101.116 0	416.148 5
4.630 0	113.200 0	524.115 9
5.144 4	125.340 0	644.804 6
5.658 9	137.692 0	779.183 7
6.173 3	150.477 0	928.944 6
6.687 8	163.981 0	1 096.668 4
7.202 2	178.425 0	1 285.056 4
7.716 7	193.597 0	1 493.923 4
8.231 1	211.241 0	1 738.748 0
8.745 6	231.852 0	2 027.674 4
9.260 0	252.213 0	2 335.492 2
9.774 4	269.833 0	2 637.467 5

θ	X(θ)
180	-0.559
170	-0.546
160	-0.539
150	-0.491
140	-0.437
130	-0.335
120	-0.24
110	-0.172
100	-0.124
90	-0.083
80	-0.063
70	0.019
60	0.304
50	0.569
40	0.738
30	0.759
20	0.725
10	0.820
0	0.814
-	-

[1]	冯豪博, 胡桥, 赵振轶. 基于精英族系遗传算法的AUV集群路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(7): 2251-2262.
[2]	蔺瑞管, 王华伟, 车畅畅, 倪晓梅, 熊明兰. 基于LSTM分类器的航空发动机预测性维护模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 1052-1059.
[3]	尹洋, 杨全顺, 王征, 刘洋. 通信距离约束下的无人船集群覆盖搜索方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3821-3828.
[4]	杨清清, 高盈盈, 郭玙, 夏博远, 杨克巍. 基于深度强化学习的海战场目标搜寻路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3486-3495.
[5]	马威强, 高永琪, 赵苗. 基于全局最优和差分变异的头脑风暴优化算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 270-278.
[6]	焦志强, 张杰勇, 姚佩阳, 王勋, 何宜超. 基于分层结构的C4ISR服务部署分布式演化方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(6): 1572-1585.
[7]	王文明, 杜佳璐. 基于正六边形栅格JPS算法的智能体路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3635-3642.
[8]	李亚南, 黄海滨, 陈亮名, 庄宇飞, 王晓丽. 变化海流环境下AUV能量最优三维路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3667-3674.
[9]	李文刚, 汪流江, 方德翔, 李玉玮, 黄郡. 联合A^*与动态窗口法的路径规划算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3694-3702.
[10]	陈岱岱, 李玩幽. 带拖线阵的水面无人艇局部路径规划算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(9): 1988-1994.
[11]	刘彦, 陈春良, 陈伟龙, 郭一鸣. 基于Pareto改进VNS-MMAS的定点修理任务多目标动态调度[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(2): 356-364.
[12]	杨秀霞, 曹唯一, 张毅. 时间和角度约束下的双圆弧路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1835-1843.
[13]	胡腾, 刘占军, 刘洋, 夏帅帅, 陈前斌. 多无人机3D侦察路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(7): 1551-1559.
[14]	高春庆, 寇英信, 李战武, 徐安, 李游, 常一哲. 小型无人机协同覆盖侦察路径规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(6): 1294-1299.
[15]	王瑛, 郑煜坤, 姚頔, 李正欣, 李超. 危险天气下改航路径网络规划[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(6): 1309-1315.