突防场景下基于NWHFS的集群射频隐身性能评估

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.05.18

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1109-1115.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.05.18

突防场景下基于NWHFS的集群射频隐身性能评估

杨诚修¹(), 王谦喆¹(), 李淑婧¹(), 裴少婷²()

1. 空军工程大学空管领航学院, 陕西西安 710051
2. 空军工程大学航空工程学院, 陕西西安 710038

收稿日期:2019-10-24 出版日期:2020-04-30 发布日期:2020-04-30
作者简介:杨诚修(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为射频隐身技术、模糊集理论和多属性决策。E-mail:ycx96123@163.com|王谦喆(1978-),男,副教授,硕士研究生导师,硕士,主要研究方向为通信与信号处理、射频隐身技术。E-mail:afeu_wqz@163.com|李淑婧(1985-),女,讲师,硕士,主要研究方向为集群控制和多属性决策。E-mail:lsj_jq@163.com|裴少婷(1986-),女,讲师,硕士,主要研究方向为计算机科学和信号处理。E-mail:251823067@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61773397);陕西省电子信息系统综合集成重点实验室项目(201901A)

Swarm RF stealth performance evaluation method based on NWHFS under penetration scene

Chengxiu YANG¹(), Qianzhe WANG¹(), Shujing LI¹(), Shaoting PEI²()

1. Air Traffic Control and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China
2. Aeronautics Engineering College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710038, China

Received:2019-10-24 Online:2020-04-30 Published:2020-04-30
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金(61773397);陕西省电子信息系统综合集成重点实验室项目(201901A)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对航空集群在突防场景下的射频(radio frequency, RF)隐身性能评估问题,提出基于正态波动犹豫模糊集(normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set, NWHFS)相关系数的评估方法。首先,推导出NWHFS相关系数表达式;然后,通过分析航空集群与单个载机平台RF隐身评估的不同,提取出集群RF隐身性能评价参数,并得到隶属度参考点公式;组织决策者根据隶属度参考点给出NWHFS决策矩阵；最终,通过计算待评估场景与参考点集之间的相关系数,定量地评价不同场景下航空集群的RF隐身性能,并由此确定RF隐身性能排序。以四机集群为研究对象,对突防场景下的3种情景进行了仿真验证,证实该评估方法的有效性。

关键词: 航空集群, 突防场景, 正态波动犹豫模糊集, 射频隐身

Abstract:

Aiming at solving the problem of the swarm radio frequency (RF) stealth performance evaluation of aircraft swarm under penetration scene, an evaluation method based on the correlation coefficient of the normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set (NWHFS) is proposed. Firstly, the NWHFS correlation coefficients expression is derived. By analyzing the differences between the RF stealth evaluation problems of aircraft swarm and single carrier platform, the parameters of the swarm RF stealth performance evaluation are extracted, and the formulas of the membership degree reference point are obtained. Decision-makers give the NWHFS decision matrix according to the membership degree reference points. Finally, the correlation coefficient between the scenes to be evaluated and the reference point set is calculated to quantitatively evaluate the RF stealth performance of the aircraft swarm under different scenes, and to determine the RF stealth performance ranking. Taking the four-aircraft swarm as the research object, the simulation of three scenes under the penetration scene is carried out, which proves the validity of the evaluation method.

Key words: aircraft swarm, penetration scene, normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set (NWHFS), radio frequency (RF) stealth

中图分类号:

V11
TJ85

杨诚修, 王谦喆, 李淑婧, 裴少婷. 突防场景下基于NWHFS的集群射频隐身性能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(5): 1109-1115.

Chengxiu YANG, Qianzhe WANG, Shujing LI, Shaoting PEI. Swarm RF stealth performance evaluation method based on NWHFS under penetration scene[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(5): 1109-1115.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 21

1	SHI C , ZHOU J , WANG F . Adaptive resource management algorithm for target tracking in radar network based on low probability of intercept[J]. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 29 (4): 1203- 1226. doi: 10.1007/s11045-017-0494-8
2	SHE J , ZHOU J , WANG F , et al. LPI optimization framework for radar network based on minimum mean-square error estimation[J]. Entropy, 2017, 19 (8): 397. doi: 10.3390/e19080397
3	SHI C , WANG F , SALOUS S , et al. Low probability of intercept-based radar waveform design for spectral coexistence of distributed multiple-radar and wireless communication systems in clutter[J]. Entropy, 2018, 20 (3): 197. doi: 10.3390/e20030197
4	吴华, 史忠亚, 沈文迪, 等. 基于改进G-GIFSS算法的雷达LPI性能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (6): 1256- 1260.
	WU H , SHI Z Y , SHEN W D , et al. Radar LPI performance assessment method based on extended G-GIFSS algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (6): 1256- 1260.
5	何召阳, 王谦喆, 宋博文, 等. 雷达信号波形域射频隐身性能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (10): 2234- 2238.
	HE Z Y , WANG Q Z , SONG B W , et al. RF stealth performance evaluation method for radar signal waveform[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (10): 2234- 2238.
6	王谦喆, 何召阳, 宋博文, 等. 机载航电系统射频隐身性能多域联合评估方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2018, 40 (1): 121- 125.
	WANG Q Z , HE Z Y , SONG B W , et al. Multi-domain joint evaluation method for RF stealth performance of airborne avionics system[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2018, 40 (1): 121- 125.
7	王经商, 吴华, 王文哲, 等. 机载雷达低截获波形射频隐身性能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 40 (1): 121- 125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2018.01.025
	WANG J S , WU H , WANG W Z , et al. An evaluation method of RF stealth performance of airborne radar low interception probability waveforms[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 40 (1): 121- 125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2018.01.025
8	孙强, 梁晓龙, 尹忠海, 等. UAV集群自组织飞行建模与控制策略研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38 (7): 1649- 1653.
	SUN Q , LIANG X L , YIN Z H , et al. UAV swarm self-orga-nized flight modeling and control strategy[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (7): 1649- 1653.
9	WEI Y , BLAKE M B , MADEY G R . An operation-time simulation framework for UAV swarm configuration and mission planning[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2013, 18, 1949- 1958.
10	张佳强, 梁晓龙, 尹忠海, 等. 航空集群协同反隐身构型与机动策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38 (11): 2518- 2522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2016.11.11
	ZHANG J Q , LIANG X L , YIN Z H , et al. Design of aircraft swarm cooperating anti-stealth configuration and maneuver strategy[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (11): 2518- 2522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2016.11.11
11	SHI C , ZHOU J , WANG F , et al. Mutual information-based LPI optimization for radar network[J]. International Journal of Electronics, 2015, 102 (7/9): 1114- 1131.
12	谢桂辉, 田茂, 王正海, 等. 射频隐身数据链的通信波形参数优化建模[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2015, 49 (4): 116- 122.
	XIE G H , TIAN M , WANG Z H , et al. An optimization model for communication waveform parameters of radio frequency stealth datalink[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2015, 49 (4): 116- 122.
13	TORRA V . Hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25 (6): 529- 539.
14	FARHADINIA B . Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2013, 240, 129- 144. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.03.034
15	YE J . Correlation coefficient of dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014, 38 (2): 659- 666.
16	REN Z , XU Z , WANG H . Normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to environmental quality evaluation[J]. Knowledge-based Systems, 2018, 159, 286- 297.
17	XU Z , XIA M . On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2011, 26 (5): 410- 425.
18	CHEN N , XU Z , XIA M . Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37 (4): 2197- 2211.
19	LIAO H , XU Z , ZENG X J . Novel correlation coefficients between hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision making[J]. Knowledge-based Systems, 2015, 82, 115- 127. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.02.020
20	GUAN X , SUN G , YI X , et al. Synthetic correlation coefficient between hesitant fuzzy sets with applications[J]. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20 (6): 1968- 1985. doi: 10.1007/s40815-018-0496-1
21	谭吉玉, 朱传喜, 张小芝, 等. 基于群体一致性的犹豫模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25 (1): 105- 109.
	TAN J Y , ZHU C X , ZHANG X Z , et al. The method of hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on group consistency[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25 (1): 105- 109.

场景	集群内个体完成探测任务所需要的最大时间	集群内个体与群内其他节点通信所需的最大时间	集群受激励后平均反应时间
场景1	34	8	800
场景2	40	4	450
场景3	70	5	300

参数	场景1	场景2	场景3
R₁	0.994	0.993	0.989
R₂	0.009	0.008	0.011
R₃	0.946	0.934	0.976
R₄	0.886	0.936	0.958

场景	C₁	C₂	C₃	C₄
Z₁	{0.993, 0.996}	{0.008 9, 0.009 2}	{0.944, 0.948}	{0.884, 0.892}
Z₂	{0.992 8, 0.993 3}	{0.007 5, 0.008 4}	{0.926, 0.938}	{0.932, 0.938}
Z₃	{0.989 2, 0.989 9}	{0.010 9, 0.012 1}	{0.975, 0.977}	{0.955, 0.961}

	C₁	C₂
Z₁	({0.993, 0.996}, {(0.992 1, 0.993, 0.993 9), (0.995 1, 0.996, 0.996 9)})	({0.008 9, 0.009 2}, {(0.008 8, 0.008 9, 0.009), (0.009 1, 0.009 2, 0.009 3)})
Z₂	({0.992 8, 0.993 3}, {(0.992 6, 0.992 8, 0.993), (0.993 1, 0.993 3, 0.993 5)})	({0.007 5, 0.008 4}, {0.007 2, 0.007 5, 0.007 8}, (0.008 1, 0.008 4, 0.008 7)})
Z₃	({0.989 2, 0.989 9}, {(0.989, 0.989 2, 0.989 4), (0.989 7, 0.989 9, 0.990 1)})	({0.010 9, 0.012 1}, {(0.010 5, 0.010 9, 0.011 3), (0.011 7, 0.012 1, 0.012 5)})

	C₃	C₄
Z₁	({0.944, 0.948}, {(0.9428, 0.944, 0.945 2), (0.946 8, 0.948, 0.949 2)})	({0.884, 0.892}, {(0.881 6, 0.884, 0.886 4), (0.889 6, 0.892, 0.894 4)})
Z₂	({0.926, 0.938}, {(0.922 4, 0.926, 0.929 6), (0.934 4, 0.938, 0.941 6)})	({0.932, 0.938}, {(0.930 2, 0.932, 0.933 8), (0.936 2, 0.938, 0.939 8)})
Z₃	({0.975, 0.977}, {(0.974 4, 0.975, 0.975 6), (0.976 4, 0.977, 0.977 6)})	({0.955, 0.961}, {(0.953 2, 0.955, 0.956 8), (0.959 2, 0.961, 0.962 8)})

[1]	赵筱彤, 周建江. 低截获MIMO雷达改进MUSIC算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 490-497.
[2]	窦山岳, 汪飞, 于伟强, 周建江, 陈军. 基于频控阵的多普勒波束锐化高度表设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2383-2391.
[3]	陈坤, 吕娜, 朱海峰, 方宇. 基于定时的航空集群机载网络更新方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2642-2648.
[4]	时晨光, 董璟, 周建江, 汪飞. 飞行器射频隐身技术研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(6): 1452-1467.
[5]	于伟强, 汪飞, 孙萍, 周建江, 陈军. 杂波背景下机载雷达信号参数的射频隐身优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(11): 3194-3201.
[6]	孙萍, 汪飞, 窦山岳, 周建江, 陈军. 基于辐射能量缩减约束的双机雷达协同目标跟踪方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(10): 2851-2859.
[7]	杨诚修, 王谦喆, 祝捷, 李昂. 空战模式下航空集群射频隐身性能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(12): 2811-2818.
[8]	吕娜, 邹鑫清, 陈柯帆, 朱海峰. 面向软件定义航空集群机载网络的更新策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(1): 206-216.
[9]	赖作镁, 乔文昇, 古博, 王师逸. 任务性能约束下传感器协同辐射控制策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1749-1754.
[10]	吕娜, 曹芳波, 陈柯帆, 刘创, 高维廷. 软件定义航空集群机载网络自适应邻居探测方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(10): 2260-2270.
[11]	何召阳, 王谦喆, 宋博文, 彭卫东, 王锦江. 雷达信号波形域射频隐身性能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(10): 2234-2238.
[12]	付银娟, 李勇, 黄琼丹, 张昆辉. OFD-NLFM雷达信号的优化设计及射频隐身性能分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(10): 2209-2214.
[13]	吕娜, 陈柯帆. 面向航空集群云网络的航空数据链MAC协议[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(5): 1164-.
[14]	张佳强, 梁晓龙, 尹忠海, 孙强. 航空集群协同反隐身构型与机动策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(11): 2518-2522.
[15]	冯博宇，王瑛，安航，李超. 机载雷达射频隐身性能风险的计算模型[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(1): 73-77.

突防场景下基于NWHFS的集群射频隐身性能评估

Swarm RF stealth performance evaluation method based on NWHFS under penetration scene

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价