融合属性关联的DPC-ELECTRE多属性决策方法及应用

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.01.21

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 202-209.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2025.01.21

融合属性关联的DPC-ELECTRE多属性决策方法及应用

徐天琦¹, 江文奇¹^,²^,*, 朱力¹, 杨珊珊¹, 王嘉丽¹

1. 南京理工大学经济管理学院, 江苏南京 210094
2. 江苏产业集群决策咨询研究基地, 江苏南京 210094

收稿日期:2023-11-17 出版日期:2025-01-21 发布日期:2025-01-25
通讯作者: 江文奇
作者简介:徐天琦 (1990—), 女, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为多属性决策、模糊决策
江文奇 (1975—), 男, 教授, 博士研究生导师, 博士, 主要研究方向为复杂决策
朱力 (1986—), 男, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为物流与供应链管理、管理评价与决策技术
杨珊珊 (1993—), 女, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为多属性群决策
王嘉丽 (1994—), 女, 博士研究生, 主要研究方向为多属性决策、模糊数据集
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71971117);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(17YJA630035)

DPC-ELECTRE multi-attribute decision-making methods and applications based on integration attribute correlation

Tianqi XU¹, Wenqi JIANG¹^,²^,*, Li ZHU¹, Shanshan YANG¹, Jiali WANG¹

1. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
2. Jiangsu Industrial Cluster Decision-Making Consulting and Research Base, Nanjing 210094, China

Received:2023-11-17 Online:2025-01-21 Published:2025-01-25
Contact: Wenqi JIANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

多属性决策环境下决策属性之间难以保持绝对独立, 属性关联可能会对决策结果产生影响, 辨识其影响过程和影响结果可为科学决策提供支撑。为此, 首先分析属性关联模糊测度模型, 采用菱形成对比较(diamond pairwise comparison, DPC)法确定新的属性关联系数。其次, 基于ELECTRE (elimination et choice translating reality)方法, 分析属性关联对非一致性指数影响的几种典型情形。再次, 全面分析3对属性两两关联情形下非一致性指数的变化条件, 并给出DPC-ELECTRE多属性决策步骤。最后, 通过算例证明该方法过程及其应用的有效性和优越性。

关键词: 多属性决策, 属性关联, 菱形成对比较方法, ELECTRE方法

Abstract:

In multi-attribute decision-making environment, it is difficult to maintain absolute independence among decision attributes, and attribute correlation may affect the decision-making result. Identifying the influence process and result can provide support for scientific decision-making. Therefore, a fuzzy measurement model of attribute association is analyzed firstly. And uses diamond pairwise comparisons (DPC) is used to determine new attribute association coefficients. Secondly, based on the elimination et choice translating reality (ELECTRE) method, several typical situations of the impact of attribute association on non-consistency index are analyzed. Thirdly, the change condition of the non-consistency index value under the pairwise association of three pairs of attributes is analyzed comprehensively, and the multi-attribute decision steps of DPC-ELECTRE are given. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness and superiority of the method and its application.

Key words: multi-attribute decision-making, attribute associations, diamond pairwise comparison (DPC) method, elimination et choice translating reality (ELECTRE) method

中图分类号:

C934

徐天琦, 江文奇, 朱力, 杨珊珊, 王嘉丽. 融合属性关联的DPC-ELECTRE多属性决策方法及应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(1): 202-209.

Tianqi XU, Wenqi JIANG, Li ZHU, Shanshan YANG, Jiali WANG. DPC-ELECTRE multi-attribute decision-making methods and applications based on integration attribute correlation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 47(1): 202-209.

图/表 2

参考文献 34

1	LIJ J,CHENM H,PEIS B.Generalized q-rung orthopair fuzzy interactive Hamacher power average and Heronian means for MADM[J].Artificial Intelligence Review,2023,56(8):8955-9008. doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10376-1
2	DAIX C,LIH,ZHOUL G.A new approach to MADM pro-blems with belief distributions based on weighted similarity measure and regret theory[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2024,243,122831. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122831
3	MOKARRARIK R,TORABIS A.Ranking cities based on their smartness level using MADM methods[J].Sustainable Ci-ties and Society,2021,72,103030. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103030
4	YADAV A K, SINGH K. The influence of different weighting methods on MADM ranking techniques and its impact on network selection for handover in HetNet[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Communication, 2023: 959-963.
5	PENAJ,NAPOLESG,SALGUEIROY.Implicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study[J].Artificial Intelligence Review,2021,54,3817-3847. doi: 10.1007/s10462-020-09941-3
6	TORRAV,NARUKAWAY.The interpretation of fuzzy integrals and their application to fuzzy systems[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2006,41(1):43-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2005.08.001
7	GRABISCHM.K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1997,92(2):167-189. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00168-1
8	SCHMEIDLERD.Integral representation without additivity[J].Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society,1986,97(2):255-261. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1986-0835875-8
9	LIANGY Y,QINJ D,MARTINEZL,et al.A heterogeneous QUALIFLEX method with criteria interaction for multi-criteria group decision making[J].Information Sciences,2020,512(28):1481-1502.
10	MALEKIN,GHOLAMIANM R,YAGHOUBIS.An integrated model of BWM and Choquet integral for determining fuzzy measures in interacting criteria[J].International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making,2022,21(3):1061-1086.
11	李从东,钟方源,张帆顺.基于优劣势排序法和Zhenyuan积分的混合型多属性决策方法[J].统计与决策,2021,37(17):178-181.
	LIC D,ZHONGF Y,ZHANGF S.Hybrid multi-attribute decision making method based on superior and inferior ranking method and Zhenyuan integral[J].Statistics and Decision,2021,37(17):178-181.
12	MUZ M,ZENGS Z.Some novel intuitionistic fuzzy information fusion methods in decision making with interaction among attributes[J].Soft Computing,2019,23,10439-10448. doi: 10.1007/s00500-018-3600-4
13	常志朋,程龙生,刘家树.基于马田系统的2可加Choquet积分多属性决策方法[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(1):133-139.
	CHANGZ P,CHENGL S,LIUJ S.A 2-additive Choquet integral multi-attribute decision making method based on Mattian system[J].Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management,2016,30(1):133-139.
14	LIUP D,YOUX L.Bidirectional projection measure of linguistic neutrosophic numbers and their application to multi-criteria group decision making[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2018,128(2):447-457.
15	ALAHMADIR A,GANIEA H,AL-QUDAHY,et al.Multi-attribute decision-making based on novel Fermatean fuzzy similarity measure and entropy measure[J].Granular Computing,2023,8(6):1385-1405. doi: 10.1007/s41066-023-00378-x
16	JABEENK,KHANQ,ULLAHK,et al.An approach to MADM based on Aczel-Alsina power Bonferroni aggregation operators for q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets[J].IEEE Access,2023,11,105248-105261. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3270267
17	BRANSJ P,VINCKEP,MARESCHALB.How to select and how to rank projects: the promethee method[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1986,24(2):228-238. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
18	YAMAGISHIK D,ABELLANAD P M,TANAIDR A B,et al.Destination planning of small islands with integrated multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) method[J].Tourism Planning & Development,2023,20(6):1019-1053.
19	江文奇,降晓璐.面向属性关联的区间犹豫模糊型PROMETHEE决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2021,43(11):3250-3258.
	JIANGW Q,JIANGX L.Interval hesitant fuzzy PROMETHEE decision method for attribute association[J].Systems Engineering and Electronics,2021,43(11):3250-3258.
20	LIZ F,PANQ,WANGD Y,et al.An extended PROMETHEE Ⅱ method for multi-attribute group decision-making under q-rung orthopair 2-tuple linguistic environment[J].International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,2022,24(7):3039-3056. doi: 10.1007/s40815-022-01321-z
21	江文奇,袁亚纯.融合关联性准则模糊测度的改进型VIKOR方法研究[J].运筹与管理,2021,30(1):94-98.
	JIANGW Q,YUANY C.Research on improved VIKOR method based on fuzzy measure of association criterion[J].Operations Research and Management Science,2021,30(1):94-98.
22	AKRAMM,MUHIUDDING,SANTOS-GARCIAG.An enhanced VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision-making with complex Fermatean fuzzy sets[J].Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering,2022,19(7):7201-7231. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022340
23	ZULQARNAINR M,GARGH,MAW X,et al.Optimal cloud service provider selection: an MADM framework on correlation-based TOPSIS with interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft set[J].Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2024,129,107578.
24	GARGH,KEIKHAA,MISHMASTN H.Multiple-attribute decision-making problem using TOPSIS and choquet integral with hesitant fuzzy number information[J].Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2020,2020(1):9874951.
25	ARORAH D,NAITHANIA.Significance of TOPSIS approach to MADM in computing exponential divergence measures for pythagorean fuzzy sets[J].Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering,2022,5(1):246-263.
26	AZALIAV H N,YAMASARIY.Penerapan MADM-ELECTRE untuk penerimaan beasiswa Pemerintah Kabupaten Bojonegoro[J].Journal of Informatics and Computer Science,2024,5(4):515-523.
27	LIUZ M,WANGD,ZHAOY J,et al.An improved ELECTRE Ⅱ-based outranking method for MADM with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and its application to emergency logistics provider selection[J].International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,2023,25(4):1495-1517.
28	TABASAMR.ELECTRE-based outranking method for multi-criteria decision making using hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic term sets[J].International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,2018,20,79-92.
29	DIVSALARM,AHMADIM,EBRAHIMIE,et al.A probabilistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral-based TODIM method for multi-attribute group decision-making[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2022,191,116266.
30	ONISAWAT,SUGENOM,NISHIWAKIY,et al.Fuzzy measure analysis of public attitude towards the use of nuclear energy[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986,20(3):259-289.
31	GRABISCHM.The representation of importance and interaction of features by fuzzy measures[J].Pattern Recognition Letters,1996,17(6):567-575.
32	GRABISCHM.K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1997,92(2):167-189.
33	TAKAHAGIE.A fuzzy measure identification method by diamond pairwise comparisons and transformation[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2008,7(3):219-232.
34	WUJ Z,ZHANGQ.2-order additive fuzzy measure identification method based on diamond pairwise comparison and maximum entropy principle[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2010,9,435-453.

kl取值	J_M⁺	J_M^-
12	2	1, 2, 3, 5
13	1, 2, 3, 5	4
14	1, 3, 4, 5	4
21	1, 3, 4, 5	2
23	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	-
24	1, 3, 4, 5	2
31	4	1, 2, 3, 5
32	-	1, 2, 3, 4, 5
34	1, 5	2, 3, 4
41	4	1, 2, 3, 5
42	2	1, 3, 4, 5
43	2, 3, 4	1, 5

[1]	彭莉莎, 孙宇祥, 薛宇凡, 周献中. 融合三支多属性决策与SAC的兵棋推演智能决策技术[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(7): 2310-2322.
[2]	关欣, 刘赢. 毕达哥拉斯犹豫模糊集多属性决策研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(3): 982-991.
[3]	余晓洁, 魏嵩, 盛佳恋, 张磊. 基于HMM的低空目标航迹威胁识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(5): 1399-1408.
[4]	王坚浩, 王龙, 张亮, 崔利杰. 灰色群组聚类和改进CRITIC赋权的供应商选择VIKOR多属性决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(1): 155-164.
[5]	郑诺希, 李武, 周小强, 刘钢. 多属性相似度一致性投影决策法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2869-2877.
[6]	尹东亮, 崔国恒, 黄晓颖, 张欢. 基于改进得分函数和前景理论的区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊多属性决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(11): 3463-3469.
[7]	任耀军, 袁修久, 黄林. q阶三角犹豫模糊BM算子及其多属性决策应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 181-191.
[8]	白静, 陈业华, 石蕊, 张亚明. 基于概率语言赋权交叉熵信度分配的应急决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(2): 476-486.
[9]	江文奇, 降晓璐. 面向属性关联的区间犹豫模糊型PROMETHEE决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(11): 3250-3258.
[10]	李岩, 陈云翔, 罗承昆, 蔡忠义. 基于概率犹豫-直觉模糊熵和证据推理的多属性决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(5): 1116-1123.
[11]	陈波, 郭圆圆, 高秀娥, 王运明, 杜秀丽. 区间直觉模糊幂加权算子的动态多属性决策[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(4): 850-855.
[12]	李贺, 江登英. 基于改进符号距离的犹豫模糊前景理论决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(12): 2820-2826.
[13]	汪汝根, 李为民, 罗骁, 吕诚中. 基于新距离测度的直觉模糊VIKOR多属性决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(11): 2524-2532.
[14]	孙贵东, 关欣, 衣晓, 赵静. 基于Normative算子的HFS数值延拓方法及多属性决策应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(7): 1530-1538.
[15]	弓晓敏, 于长锐. 基于云模型的改进TODIM方案评价方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(7): 1539-1547.

融合属性关联的DPC-ELECTRE多属性决策方法及应用

DPC-ELECTRE multi-attribute decision-making methods and applications based on integration attribute correlation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价